IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial5p412-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shainin’s Experiment Design Methodology in Occupational Safety Assessment: Application Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Gorny

Abstract

Purpose: The article refers to the role of safety management measures and their significance for reducing the cost of accidents, injuries and diseases and costs resulting from disruptions of manufacturing processes, that are borne by employers. It is shown that for any improvement measures to be effective, it is vital to ascertain the nature of defects, the circumstances in which they occur and to eliminate their root causes. Design/Methodology/Approach: The article outlines the potential for assessing occupational safety by means of Shainin’s experiment design methods. It shows that the experiment techniques can be used to identify and assess problems with sufficient accuracy helping organizations to identify adequate process improvement measures. It enumerates the key prerequisites for the use of Shainin’s experiment design method and describes a relevant procedure that ensures the achievement of desired outcomes. Findings: A review of relevant literature shows that Shainin’s experiment design methods, which were originally developed to improve manufacturing processes, can be used to address issues in the production working environment. Practical implications: A procedure is developed for identifying key disruptions which, if eliminated, will improve working conditions and worker well-being. Examples are provided of the factors to be targeted to achieve the desired improvements in the working environment. In this manner, the study can help organizations choose and roll out adequate solutions that will suit their methodologies and lead to desired outcomes. The proposed procedure supports the identification of the working environment factors that significantly affect safety, and helps define their impacts and, consequently, improve the effectiveness of improvement measures. Originality/Value: While the article stops short of offering an example of the procedure, it points to the implications of experiments that are helpful in reducing occupational hazards. In the field of occupational safety, the article shows the potential of employing Shainin’s experiment design method to examine any well-defined issue and any issue having to do with the manufacturing environment and the conditions required for the safe operation of workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Gorny, 2021. "Shainin’s Experiment Design Methodology in Occupational Safety Assessment: Application Guidelines," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 412-425.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:412-425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2741/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Shainin's experiment design methodology; occupational safety; workplace; working environment improvements; selection of improvement measures and actions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:412-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.