IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial2p127-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the Process of Evaluation of the Academic Teachers with the Use of Data Mart and Business Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Muryjas
  • Monika Wawer
  • Magdalena Rzemieniak

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to present the original model of management of academic teachers' remote work evaluation that implements an analytical approach. Design/Methodology/Approach: Desk research and interview method have been applied in this paper. The literature review concerned two areas, i.e., the analytical approach to management and the management of university educational processes. Unstructured interviews conducted with university authorities located in Poland were the second research method applied. Findings: Based on literature studies, conducted interviews and authors' personal experience, the original model of academic teachers' remote work evaluation that implements an analytical approach and utilises data mart concept and business intelligence tools has been created. This model contains the following elements, the conceptual model of data mart allowing the evaluation of courses realisation and teachers job, KPIs utilised in this evaluation, and the dashboard presenting KPI's values. Two main areas representing courses evaluation and teachers’ evaluation have been considered. Practical Implications: The authors propose the solution that utilises an analytical approach to improve the management of the evaluation process of educational processes at the university. Created model may be a valuable source of inspiration for university authorities responsible for ensuring the high efficiency of these processes, and for people responsible for developing teachers’ competencies. According to the authors, the implementation of this model can contribute to the improvement of the academic education. Originality/Value: An analytical approach in evaluation of educational processes proposed by authors is innovative in nature and is particularly important in the context of increasingly widespread remote education. Its adoption to management states a big challenge for university authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Muryjas & Monika Wawer & Magdalena Rzemieniak, 2021. "Managing the Process of Evaluation of the Academic Teachers with the Use of Data Mart and Business Intelligence," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 127-140.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2:p:127-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2196/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiorenzo Franceschini & Maurizio Galetto & Domenico Maisano, 2019. "Designing Performance Measurement Systems," Management for Professionals, Springer, number 978-3-030-01192-5, December.
    2. Matthew J. Liberatore & Wenhong Luo, 2010. "The Analytics Movement: Implications for Operations Research," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 313-324, August.
    3. William Villegas-Ch & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2020. "A Business Intelligence Framework for Analyzing Educational Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mortenson, Michael J. & Doherty, Neil F. & Robinson, Stewart, 2015. "Operational research from Taylorism to Terabytes: A research agenda for the analytics age," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 583-595.
    2. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Joseph Nzongang, 2021. "Business analytics for managing performance of microfinance Institutions: A flexible management of the implementation process," Post-Print hal-03209188, HAL.
    3. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Joseph Nzongang, 2021. "Business Analytics for Managing Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Flexible Management of the Implementation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Benjamin T. Hazen & Joseph B. Skipper & Christopher A. Boone & Raymond R. Hill, 2018. "Back in business: operations research in support of big data analytics for operations and supply chain management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 201-211, November.
    5. Marco Nunes & António Abreu & Célia Saraiva, 2021. "A Model to Manage Cooperative Project Risks to Create Knowledge and Drive Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Bechler, Georg & Steinhardt, Claudius & Mackert, Jochen & Klein, Robert, 2021. "Product line optimization in the presence of preferences for compromise alternatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 902-917.
    7. Kirsten Hoffmann & Udo Buscher & Janis Sebastian Neufeld & Felix Tamke, 2017. "Solving Practical Railway Crew Scheduling Problems with Attendance Rates," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(3), pages 147-159, June.
    8. Tom Pape, 2020. "Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources," Papers 2012.13813, arXiv.org.
    9. Durrel Ramrathan & Mabutho Sibanda, 2014. "Impact of Analytics in Financial Decision Making: Evidence from a Case Study Approach," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 10(5), pages 124-135, October.
    10. Elitzur, Ramy, 2020. "Data analytics effects in major league baseball," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Duan, Yanqing & Cao, Guangming & Edwards, John S., 2020. "Understanding the impact of business analytics on innovation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 673-686.
    12. Michael F. Gorman, 2017. "Interfaces Editor’s Statement," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-3, February.
    13. Alexander Geyda & Igor Lysenko, 2019. "Modeling of Information Operations Effects: Technological Systems Example," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Johnson, Michael P. & Midgley, Gerald & Chichirau, George, 2018. "Emerging trends and new frontiers in community operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1178-1191.
    15. F. Franceschini & D. Maisano, 2020. "Adapting Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment to fuse preference orderings in manufacturing applications," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 387-402, February.
    16. Ramayya Krishnan & Alfred Blumstein & Jon Nehlsen, 2018. "Designing and Sustaining an Award-Winning Analytics Educational Program: The Heinz College of Information Systems and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 372-383, August.
    17. Mihaela Muntean & Doina Dănăiaţă & Luminiţa Hurbean & Cornelia Jude, 2021. "A Business Intelligence & Analytics Framework for Clean and Affordable Energy Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit, 2018. "Sustaining performance in turbulent times: Identifying, developing, and expanding core activities," Post-Print hal-01935634, HAL.
    19. Susan W. Palocsay & Scott P. Stevens & Luis J. Novoa, 2020. "STRATA: A Spreadsheet Tool for Multidimensional Analysis of Operations Research/Management Science Assessment Test Data," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 41-56, September.
    20. Tino T. Herden, 2020. "Explaining the competitive advantage generated from Analytics with the knowledge-based view: the example of Logistics and Supply Chain Management," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 163-214, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Management; job evaluation; KPI; data mart; business intelligence; academic teacher.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2:p:127-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.