IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial1p1034-1048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Self-Supply of Food and Services in Rural Households in Poland Using Canonical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Trebska
  • Agnieszka Biernat-Jarka

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the size and structure of self-supply of food and services in rural households and to indicate the hierarchy of factors determining the choice of this form of consumption in the discussed households in Poland. Design/Methodology/Approach: The level and structure of self-supply of food and services in rural households depend on the simultaneous action of many factors. The impact of these determinants on consumption behavior in the researched rural households was examined using the canonical correlation analysis. The study period concerned 2017. Findings: Significant determinants in the conducted study turned out to be the variables describing the number of children in a household and the number of people permanently working on a farm. Household income, the assessment of economic living conditions in Poland, or the type of commune in which the respondents lived also turned out to be an important factor influencing the level of self-supply of food and services in the surveyed rural households. Practical Implications: The article allows to assess the scale of the phenomenon and the determinants of self-supply with food and services, which gained a new meaning during the lockdown period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Originality/Value: There are no analyses in the literature describing prosumer behavior related to the production of food and the provision of services by all households in rural areas, both those related to agriculture and non-agricultural ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Trebska & Agnieszka Biernat-Jarka, 2021. "Determinants of Self-Supply of Food and Services in Rural Households in Poland Using Canonical Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 1034-1048.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:1034-1048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2086/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, Stephen, 2014. "Third Wave Do-It-Yourself (DIY): Potential for prosumption, innovation, and entrepreneurship by local populations in regions without industrial manufacturing infrastructure," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 18-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paulina Trębska & Agnieszka Biernat-Jarka & Marcin Wysokiński & Arkadiusz Gromada & Magdalena Golonko, 2021. "Prosumer Behavior Related to Running a Household in Rural Areas of the Masovian Voivodeship in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corsini, Lucia & Aranda-Jan, Clara B. & Moultrie, James, 2019. "Using digital fabrication tools to provide humanitarian and development aid in low-resource settings," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Ben-Menahem, Shiko M. & Franke, Nikolaus & Füller, Johann & von Krogh, Georg, 2021. "Treading new ground in household sector innovation research: Scope, emergence, business implications, and diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    3. Berns, John P. & Jia, Yankun & Gondo, Maria, 2022. "Crowdfunding success in sustainability-oriented projects: An exploratory examination of the crowdfunding of 3D printers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Laurent Dupont & Alex Gabriel & Mauricio Camargo & Claudine Guidat, 2017. "Collaborative Innovation Projects Engaging open communities: a Case Study on Emerging Challenges," Post-Print hal-01582548, HAL.
    5. Harm-Jan Steenhuis & Xin Fang & Tolga Ulusemre, 2020. "Global Diffusion of Innovation during the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of Additive Manufacturing or 3D Printing," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-34, February.
    6. Laurent Dupont & Fedoua Kasmi & Joshua M. Pearce & Roland Ortt, 2020. "“Do-It-Together” and innovation, towards the Factories of the Future (FoF)," Post-Print hal-03024062, HAL.
    7. Pedro Manuel Hernández-Castellano & María Dolores Martínez-Rivero & María Dolores Marrero-Alemán & Luis Suárez-García & Alejandro Gutiérrez-Barcenilla, 2020. "Open Education through Interactive Training Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Muhammad Ilyas & Arif ud din & Muhammad Haleem & Irshad Ahmad, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurial acceptance: an examination of technology acceptance model and do-it-yourself behavior," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Rezaee Vessal, Saeedeh & Partouche-Sebban, Judith & Scuotto, Veronica & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2021. "Overcoming stressful life events at do-it-yourself (DIY) laboratories. A new trailblazing career for disadvantaged entrepreneurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Esquivel-Sada, Daphne, 2022. "Responsible intellectual property rights? Untangling open-source biotech adherence to intellectual property rights through DIYbio," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Galvin, Peter & Burton, Nicholas & Nyuur, Richard, 2020. "Leveraging inter-industry spillovers through DIY laboratories: Entrepreneurship and innovation in the global bicycle industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Tabarés, Raúl & Kuittinen, Hanna, 2020. "A tale of two innovation cultures: Bridging the gap between makers and manufacturers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    13. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp, 2018. "Care and Production of Clothing in Norwegian Homes: Environmental Implications of Mending and Making Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Li, Zhenhua & Gao, Xuan, 2021. "Makers’ relationship network, knowledge acquisition and innovation performance: An empirical analysis from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    15. Stefano Colombo & Paolo G. Garella, 2022. "Customer‐Based Customization and Price Competition," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(4), pages 939-961, December.
    16. Stephen Fox, 2019. "Moveable Production Systems for Sustainable Development and Trade: Limitations, Opportunities and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Paulina Trębska & Agnieszka Biernat-Jarka & Marcin Wysokiński & Arkadiusz Gromada & Magdalena Golonko, 2021. "Prosumer Behavior Related to Running a Household in Rural Areas of the Masovian Voivodeship in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Qiu, Yixin & Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Arndt, Félix & Ng, Wilson, 2023. "Microfoundations and dynamics of do-it-yourself ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Ng, Wilson & Arndt, Félix & Huang, Tori Y., 2020. "Do-It-yourself laboratories as integration-based ecosystems✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Rickard, Amelia & Wagner, Jeffrey & Schull, Jonathan, 2017. "Observations on the technology and economics of digital emissions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 28-32.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rural households; food self-supply; services; income; canonical correlation analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:1034-1048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.