IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3bp372-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Concentration of the Audit Services Market in the Context of Mandatory Auditor Rotation in Poland and the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Justyna Godawska
  • Małgorzata Kutera

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the paper is to identify and analyse changes in the concentration of the audit services market after the introduction of the mandatory rotation of audit firms in Poland and in the UK. Design/Methodology/Approach: The Polish sample consists of 352 companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange Main Market and the UK sample covers 341 companies listed in the FTSE 350 Index on the London Stock Exchange. We calculated the market share of each audit firm based on the number of statutory audits of financial statement performed for analysed companies for 2018-2020 years. The data was hand collected from the auditor reports posted on companies’ websites. The audit market concentration was measured by means of the ‘Big 4’, indicator, the ‘10KAP’ indicator, the 4-firm concentration ratio CR4, the 8-firm concentration ratio CR8, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index. Findings: The research findings reveal that the UK market is much more concentrated than the Polish one. In both countries, the market share of Big 4 firms is decreasing (although in Poland at a much faster rate). The introduction of the mandatory rotation of the audit firm had little impact on the improvement of competitiveness on the audit services market, especially in the United Kingdom. Practical Implications: The research results may be helpful for the relevant regulatory institutions in assessing the effectiveness of introducing the obligation to rotate an audit firm in the context of reducing the concentration of the audit services markets. In addition, the results may serve as a basis for future research. Originality/Value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, the paper is the first attempt to assess the changes in the concentration of the Polish and British markets after the introduction of the mandatory rotation of audit firms. In the analysis of changes in audit firms, the direction of these changes was assessed, taking into account the division into Big 4 firms, 10 key audit players and other audit firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Justyna Godawska & Małgorzata Kutera, 2021. "Changes in the Concentration of the Audit Services Market in the Context of Mandatory Auditor Rotation in Poland and the United Kingdom," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 372-385.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:372-385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2471/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jere R. Francis & Paul N. Michas & Scott E. Seavey, 2013. "Does Audit Market Concentration Harm the Quality of Audited Earnings? Evidence from Audit Markets in 42 Countries," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 325-355, March.
    2. Mara Cameran & Annalisa Prencipe & Marco Trombetta, 2016. "Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 35-58, May.
    3. de Vany, Arthur & Kim, Cassey Lee Hong, 2003. "Stochastic Market Structure: Concentration Measures and Motion Picture Antitrust," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30701, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    4. Jeff Boone & Inder K. Khurana & K. K. Raman, 2012. "Audit Market Concentration and Auditor Tolerance for Earnings Management," Working Papers 0014, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    5. Tim Pearson & Greg Trompeter, 1994. "Competition in the Market for Audit Services: The Effect of Supplier Concentration on Audit Fees," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 115-135, June.
    6. Jeff P. Boone & Inder K. Khurana & K.K. Raman, 2012. "Audit Market Concentration and Auditor Tolerance for Earnings Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 1171-1203, December.
    7. Emilie Feldman, 2006. "A Basic Quantification of the Competitive Implications of the Demise of Arthur Andersen," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 29(3), pages 193-212, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Yue & Shroff, Nemit & Zhang, Pengdong, 2023. "The dark side of audit market competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    2. Gad Jacek, 2023. "Concentration on the market of audit services provided to publicly listed companies: Evidence from Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(1), pages 32-45, March.
    3. Hallman, Nicholas J. & Kartapanis, Antonis & Schmidt, Jaime J., 2022. "How do auditors respond to competition? Evidence from the bidding process," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    4. Jeroen van Raak & Erik Peek & Roger Meuwissen & Caren Schelleman, 2020. "The effect of audit market structure on audit quality and audit pricing in the private‐client market," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3-4), pages 456-488, March.
    5. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    6. Luippold, Benjamin L. & Kida, Thomas & Piercey, M. David & Smith, James F., 2015. "Managing audits to manage earnings: The impact of diversions on an auditor’s detection of earnings management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 39-54.
    7. Hye‐Jeong Nam, 2018. "The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Transition on Audit Effort and Audit Fees: Evidence from Korea," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 512-524, December.
    8. Lennox, Clive & Wang, Zi-Tian & Wu, Xi, 2018. "Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions: Evidence from China," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 21-40.
    9. Evans, Lawrance & Schwartz, Jeremy, 2014. "The effect of concentration and regulation on audit fees: An application of panel data techniques," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 130-144.
    10. Christopher Bleibtreu & Stephan Ulrike Stefani, 2013. "The Effects of Mandatory Auditor Rotation on Low Balling Behavior and Auditor Independence," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2013-14, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    11. Hongkang Xu & Mai Dao & Jia Wu, 2019. "The effect of local political corruption on earnings quality," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 551-574, August.
    12. Bum†Jin Park, 2017. "Auditors’ Economic Incentives and the Sensitivity of Managerial Pay to Accounting Performance," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 382-399, December.
    13. Numan, Wieteke & Willekens, Marleen, 2012. "An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 450-465.
    14. Boahen, Eric & Mamatzakis, Emmanuel, 2016. "Do Religion, Corporate Governance and BIG 4 Audit Interactions Affect Misclassification?," MPRA Paper 76804, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Mahdi Salehi & Grzegorz Zimon & Hayder Adnan Hashim & Ryszard Jędrzejczak & Adam Sadowski, 2022. "Accounting Quality and Audit Attributes on the Stock Price Crashes in an Emerging Market," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    16. Dan Dacian Cuzdriorean, 2013. "Most Recent Findings In Earnings Management Area: Interesting Insights From Traditionally Top 5 Leading Accounting Journals," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(15), pages 1-5.
    17. Chu, Ling & Simunic, Dan A. & Ye, Minlei & Zhang, Ping, 2018. "Transaction costs and competition among audit firms in local markets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 129-147.
    18. Seyed Sajad Ebrahimi Rad & Zaini Embong & Norman Mohd-Saleh & Romlah Jaffar, 2016. "Financial Information Quality and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Malaysia," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 12(1), pages 129-151.
    19. López, Dennis M. & Rich, Kevin T., 2017. "Geographic distance and municipal internal control reporting," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 40-49.
    20. Mihai Carp & Costel Istrate, 2021. "Audit Quality under Influences of Audit Firm and Auditee Characteristics: Evidence from the Romanian Regulated Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Audit market concentration; auditor rotation; Big 4; financial auditing.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:372-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.