IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i2bp692-699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disputes over the Definition of the Concept of An Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Jerzy Boehlke
  • Mateusz Tomanek

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to indicate the methodological possibility of reconciling empiricist and phenomenalist views in the consideration of the concept of ‘an enterprise’ carried out within the framework of economic, management and organizational theory. Design/Methodology/Approach: The proposal is an attempt to use and generalise the hitherto achievements of these disciplines in the field of enterprise studies and takes into account the state of methodological reflection resulting from discussions on the grounds of contemporary empiricism and hermeneutics. Findings: The article is a presentation of various views in the discussion on the essence of the enterprise in the light of contemporary empiricism and hermeneutics. The ‘indefiniteness’ and ‘imprecision’ of the concept of ‘an enterprise’ or ‘a firm’, as it has been stated for example in the framework of the European Union law, confirms the validity of the statements of Gödel, Church, Lövenheim-Skolem as well as of the Duhem-Quine thesis, which are well known in the contemporary methodological thought. The practice of functioning of enterprises as entities of the market economy, the history of business as reflected in the ‘path of dependence’ and the analysis of the existing system of institutions mean that the disputes waged in the theory of economics and management about the essence of the enterprise as an empirically knowable entity may be effectively overcome on the grounds of the interpretative approach relevant to the phenomenalist methodology. The relaxation in the contemporary methodology of sciences of the rigours of traditional empiricism, especially in its restrictive form offered by neopositivism, and the introduction of phenomenological aspects in attempts to define the concept of ‘an enterprise’ as a multidimensional vector, whose components are certain sets of types of characteristics of different types of enterprises creates an opportunity on the ground of economic theory of enterprise to formulate empirically verifiable or falsifiable sentences. Practical Implications: The definition of the enterprise concept proposed in the article may be useful in legislative practice concerning the enterprise, its organisation and operation. Originality/Value: The article proposes a new way of defining the concept of ‘an enterprise’ using the achievements of empirical and phenomenalist theory of scientific cognition. This definition makes it possible to increase the precision of research within the economic theory of enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerzy Boehlke & Mateusz Tomanek, 2021. "Disputes over the Definition of the Concept of An Enterprise," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 692-699.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:692-699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2314/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spulber,Daniel F., 2009. "The Theory of the Firm," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521736602.
    2. David Knights & Hugh Willmott, 1992. "Conceptualizing Leadership Processes: A Study Of Senior Managers In A Financial Services Company," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 761-782, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frannie A. Léautier, 2014. "Capacity Development for the Transformation of Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-058, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Timothy W Guinnane & Susana Mart�nez-Rodr�guez, 2018. "Choice of Enterprise Form: Spain, 1886–1936," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 1-26.
    3. Timothy Guinnane & Jakob Schneebacher, 2018. "Capital Structure and the Choice of Enterprise Form: theory and history," Working Papers 1061, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    4. Gershkov, Alex & Li, Jianpei & Schweinzer, Paul, 2016. "How to share it out: The value of information in teams," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 261-304.
    5. Ip Eric C., 2012. "Judicial Review in China: A Positive Political Economy Analysis," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 331-366, October.
    6. Jacques‐François Thisse, 2010. "Toward A Unified Theory Of Economic Geography And Urban Economics," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 281-296, February.
    7. Takao Ohkawa & Tetsuya Shinkai & Makoto Okamura & Kozo Harimaya, 2012. "Endogenous Determination of the Liability Rule in Oligopolistic Markets," Discussion Paper Series 91, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Jul 2012.
    8. Xianwen Shi & Aloysius Siow, 2014. "Information externalities and intermediaries in frictional search markets," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1131-1152, November.
    9. Joel Isabirye, 2021. "The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Foundations, Tenets and Relevance," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 19(1), pages 324-335, May.
    10. Schlottmann, Frank & Seese, Detlef, 2004. "A hybrid heuristic approach to discrete multi-objective optimization of credit portfolios," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 373-399, September.
    11. Raelin, Joseph A., 2017. "Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application—An editor’s reflection," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 215-221.
    12. Tetsuya Shinkai & Takao Ohkawa & Makoto Okamura & Kozo Harimaya, 2012. "Delegation and Limited Liability in a Modern Capitalistic Economy," Discussion Paper Series 87, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Apr 2012.
    13. Dimitri O. Ledenyov & Viktor O. Ledenyov, 2013. "On the theory of firm in nonlinear dynamic financial and economic systems," Papers 1302.6721, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2013.
    14. Dimitra Petropoulou, 2007. "Information Costs, Networks and Intermediation in International Trade," Economics Series Working Papers 370, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    15. Raelin, Joseph A., 2011. "From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 195-211.
    16. Christian Helmers & Mark Rogers, 2010. "Innovation and the Survival of New Firms in the UK," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 36(3), pages 227-248, May.
    17. Xianwen Shi & Aloysius Siow, 2011. "Search Intermediaries," Working Papers tecipa-426, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    18. Matthias Kräkel, 2017. "Authority and Incentives in Organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(2), pages 295-311, April.
    19. Jolanda Hessels & Udo Brixy & Wim Naudé & Thomas Gries, 2014. "Skill Variety, Innovation and New Business Formation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-011/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Pierre Garner & Loris Guery, 2021. "Humour adaptatif, estime de soi, impuissance acquise et position managériale : étude d’un modèle de médiation modérée," Post-Print hal-03447764, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Methodology; enterprise; definition.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • D20 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - General
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • P12 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Enterprises

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:692-699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.