IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i1p41-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of German and Czech Public Procurement System and Economic Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Kunz
  • Richard Pospisil

Abstract

Purpose: The paper determines the similarities and divergences in the public procurement system in Germany and the Czech Republic. The authors assessed the contribution of the public procurement system in each country’s GDP, identified similarities in the procurement process and how they affect the overall outcome. Divergences in the two countries procurement process and how they affect the outcome were also identified. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was designed by using secondary research method as it has a wide scope that would be a challenge to achieve using primary research method. Secondary research methods were utilized to generate data which is analyzed by quantitative techniques. Findings: The most notable similarities include the use of e-procurement and the different types of public procurement contracts to enhance transparency and efficiency. Apart from that, there are some divergences where Germany seems to be a little bit more efficient compared to the Czech procurement system. Some of the divergences include higher corruption levels in the Czech Republic system than in Germany and also higher efficiency in terms of processing tender in German system than in the Czech Republic. Practical Implications: The study compares the public procurement systems in Germany and the Czech Republic and underlines potentials and disadvantages of both systems. Originality/Value: The research delivers a legal-economic comparison of German and Czech public procurement systems, including influence and effects made by European Law.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Kunz & Richard Pospisil, 2020. "Comparison of German and Czech Public Procurement System and Economic Impacts," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 41-54.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:1:p:41-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1534/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Randrianarisoa, Laingo Manitra & Bolduc, Denis & Choo, Yap Yin & Oum, Tae Hoon & Yan, Jia, 2015. "Effects of corruption on efficiency of the European airports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 65-83.
    2. Greet Peersman, 2014. "Overview: Data Collection and Analysis Methods in Impact Evaluation: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No. 10," Papers innpub755, Methodological Briefs.
    3. Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh, 2014. "The Public Procurement System: A Business Sector Perspective," Working Papers 1401, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas P. Kyriacou & Leonel Muinelo-Gallo & Oriol Roca-Sagalés, 2018. "The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of institutions: an empirical analysis," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 1802, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    2. Kyriacou, Andreas P. & Muinelo-Gallo, Leonel & Roca-Sagalés, Oriol, 2019. "The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 93-102.
    3. Kimiko Terai & Amihai Glazer, 2021. "How an ineffective agent can increase his budget," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 133-147, March.
    4. Brzić, Barbara & Dabić, Marina & Kukura, Frane & Podobnik, Boris, 2021. "The effects of corruption and the fraction of private ownership on the productivity of telecommunication companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Suncana Slijepcevic & Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh, 2015. "Challenging Competition at Public Procurement Markets: Are SMEs Too Big to Fail? The Case of BiH and Croatia," Working Papers 1504, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    6. Chang, Chong-Chuo, 2023. "The impact of quality of institutions on firm performance: A global analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 694-716.
    7. OMISORE, Segun & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2019. "Corporate Entrepreneurship, Strategy Formulation, and the Performance of the Nigerian Manufacturing Sector," Thesis Commons u39nc, Center for Open Science.
    8. Fernández, Xose Luis & Gundelfinger, Javier & Coto-Millán, Pablo, 2022. "The impact of logistics and intermodality on airport efficiency," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 233-239.
    9. VikniswariVija Kumaran* & Yew Yao Xi & Fan Sui Feng & Ho Xiao Jin & MakKah Weng & Teh Chun Pin & Shelena Soosay Nathan, 2018. "Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Oceania Continent Airports: Does Workload Unit Matters?," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1120-1124:6.
    10. Liu, Shuli & Wan, Yulai & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Does high-speed rail development affect airport productivity? Evidence from China and Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Liu, Shuli & Wan, Yulai & Ha, Hun-Koo & Yoshida, Yuichiro & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Impact of high-speed rail network development on airport traffic and traffic distribution: Evidence from China and Japan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 115-135.
    12. Hugo Teixeira & Alexandre Magalhães & André Ramalho & Maria de Fátima Pina & Hernâni Gonçalves, 2021. "Indoor Environments and Geographical Information Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    13. Randrianarisoa, Laingo M. & Oum, Tae Hoon & Yu, Chunyan, 2023. "Corruption and airport efficiency: A study on Asian airports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 46-54.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Procurement system; legal-economic comparison; efficiency; e-procurement.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E63 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:1:p:41-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.