IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijfirm/v2y2012i2p148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are American and European Companies Returning Back from China?

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Antonio Filipe

Abstract

China has been the destination country for many international companies investments. Economy keeps very competitive and many investments are coming yet to China, where production costs are low. Chinese economic power and its capability to penetrate in international markets made China a very consistent and influent economic country. However, many companies are coming back from China because they consider that the reduced costs (principally wages) are not anymore as attractive as before. An analysis of this new international scenario is made in this paper as much as a perspective for the future and the implications for companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Antonio Filipe, 2012. "Are American and European Companies Returning Back from China?," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 2(2), pages 148-148.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalfirm.com/journal/41/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leamer, Edward E, 1980. "The Leontief Paradox, Reconsidered," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(3), pages 495-503, June.
    2. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    3. Jose António Filipe, 2011. "Socio-Economics in Transition Times: A Reflection on Cooperation as a Strategy to Promote Wealth," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 1(3), pages 149-149.
    4. Donald R. Davis & David E. Weinstein, 1996. "Empirical Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory: What Do They Tell Us?," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 22(4), pages 433-440, Fall.
    5. James R. Williams, 1970. "The Resource Content in International Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 111-122, February.
    6. Leamer, Edward E, 1987. "Paths of Development in the Three-Factor, n-Good General Equilibrium Model," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(5), pages 961-999, October.
    7. Thomas Vollrath, 1991. "A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 127(2), pages 265-280, June.
    8. David S, Jr Clifton & William B. Marxsen, 1984. "An Empirical Investigation of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 32-38, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José António Filipe & Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira & Manuel Pacheco Coelho & Diogo Moura, 2012. "FDI Political Risks: The New International Context," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 2(2), pages 117-117.
    2. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2008. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content of Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2008_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    3. Ciaian, Pavel & Kancs, d'Artis & Pokrivcak, Jan, 2011. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content in Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE - Vantaggi comparati, costi di transazione e contenuto dei fattori nel commercio agr," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 64(1), pages 67-101.
    4. Donald R. Davis & David E. Weinstein, 2002. "What Role for Empirics in International Trade?," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 57(04), pages 441-468, December.
    5. Brakman, Steven & van Marrewijk, Charles, 2013. "Lumpy countries, urbanization, and trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 252-261.
    6. P. Commendatore & I. Kubin & P. Mossay, 2018. "On the new economic geography of a multicone world," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 539-554, August.
    7. Daniel Bernhofen, 2010. "The Empirics of General Equilibrium Tade Theory: What Have we Learned?," CESifo Working Paper Series 3242, CESifo.
    8. Batista, Catia & Potin, Jacques, 2014. "Stages of diversification in a neoclassical world," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 276-284.
    9. Algieri, Bernadina, 2004. "Trade specialisation patterns: the case of Russia," BOFIT Discussion Papers 19/2004, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    10. Allan Webster, 1993. "Comparative Advantage and Long‐Run Dutch Disease Effects: the International Trade of Trinidad and Tobago," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 153-166, June.
    11. García, Pablo Marcelo, 2005. "Measuring Willingness-to-Pay in Discrete Chice Models with Semi-Parametric Techniques," Revista Latinoamericana de Desarrollo Economico, Carrera de Economía de la Universidad Católica Boliviana (UCB) "San Pablo", issue 5, pages 83-100, Octubre.
    12. Cörvers F. & Reininga T., 1998. "The Dutch Factor Content of Human and Physical Capital: A Test of the HOV Model," ROA Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    13. Gilroy, Bernard Michael, 1991. "Faktorgehalt und internationaler Handel [Factor content and international trade]," MPRA Paper 21037, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Ramanovich, Mikhail, 2010. "Zur Bestimmung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit des weißrussischen Milchsektors: Aussagefähigkeit von Wettbewerbsindikatoren und Entwicklung eines kohärenten Messungskonzepts," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 53, number 94739.
    15. M A Cole & R J R Elliott & K Shimamoto, 2003. "US Specialization in Pollution-Intensive Industries: Factor Intensities versus Environmental Regulations," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0321, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    16. Lars Lundberg & Par Wiker, 1997. "Skilled Labour and International Specialisation in OECD Countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 369-385.
    17. Cörvers, Frank & Reininga, T., 1998. "The Dutch factor content of human and physical capital: a test of the HOV model," ROA Research Memorandum 1E, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    18. Roberto Álvarez & J. Fuentes, 2012. "Specialization dynamics and natural resources abundance," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 148(4), pages 733-750, December.
    19. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    20. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalfirm.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.