IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ene/journl/y2015p173-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial mechanisms supporting social and economic development of rural territories in EU

Author

Listed:
  • Mariia Ilina

    (Public Institution "Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine", Kyiv)

Abstract

Milestones of establishment and transformations of EU Common agrarian policy are described. Principles of European policy of rural development are presented, and the experience of its modification is outlined. Institutional framework and mechanisms to finance measures on rural development in EU member states are studied. Advantages and gaps of the European agrarian policy and rural development are objected, and opportunities to apply the experience are analyzed. Approaches to reform agrarian policy in EU candidate countries are defined. European experience on supporting development of agrarian industry and rural territories is considered to evaluate potential of Ukraine's rural development policy to reformation. Measures having considerable impact upon social and ecological situation on rural territories are defined among the list of CAP measures. Taking into consideration current status of CAP and the accession intentions of Ukraine, urgent social and ecological measures to be realized to support development of agrarian industry and rural territories are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariia Ilina, 2015. "Financial mechanisms supporting social and economic development of rural territories in EU," Economics of Nature and the Environment, Mykhaylo Khvesyk, pages 173-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:ene:journl:y:2015:p:173-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics-of-nature.net/uploads/arhiv/2015/Ilina.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Hubbard & Matthew Gorton, 2011. "Placing Agriculture within Rural Development: Evidence from EU Case Studies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(1), pages 80-95, February.
    2. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2014. "The EU Cohesion policy in context: regional growth and the influence of agricultural and rural development policies," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 85, European Institute, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaman, Gheorghe & Georgescu, George, 2015. "Financing the endogenous development at regional and county levels. Particularities, trends and challenges," MPRA Paper 62270, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Adelar Fochezatto & Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet & Patricia Batistela & Rodrigo Valdes, 2023. "Income Leakage Regional Effects: Supply and Demand Shocks during the Pandemic in Brazil and Chile," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Apostolos G. Papadopoulos, 2015. "The Impact of the CAP on Agriculture and Rural Areas of EU Member States," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 4(1), pages 22-53, April.
    4. Ionut Florin BRATILOVEANU & Adrian IRIMIA & Cristian Virgil MARINAS & Ramona Stefania IGRET, 2016. "Eu Funds To Support Human Capital Development In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 428-434, November.
    5. Jana Kolaøíková & Ondøej Dvouletý & Petr Kolaøík, 2018. "Economic performance of the NUTS III Regions in the Czech Republic in the context of entrepreneurship subsidies from the EU Structural Funds," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 129-153.
    6. Barbara Wieliczko & Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Zbigniew Floriańczyk, 2021. "EU Rural Policy’s Capacity to Facilitate a Just Sustainability Transition of the Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Neil Lyee & Marc Cowling, 2015. "Do Rural Firms Perceive Different Problems? Geography, Sorting, and Barriers to Growth in UK SMEs," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(1), pages 25-42, February.
    8. Gabriela Tigu & Laura Marinas & Ileana Valimareanu Mircioi, 2015. "Contribution of EU funds to the development of human capital in rural areas," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 4, pages 356-367.
    9. Laura Elena MARINAS, 2015. "Returns on EU Funding for Human Capital Development in Rural Areas," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(4), pages 491-505, October.
    10. Gouveia, M.C. & Henriques, C.O. & Costa, P., 2021. "Evaluating the efficiency of structural funds: An application in the competitiveness of SMEs across different EU beneficiary regions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Stefan Hartman & Gert De Roo, 2013. "Towards Managing Nonlinear Regional Development Trajectories," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 556-570, June.
    12. Mindaugas Butkus & Alma Maciulyte-Sniukiene & Renata Macaitiene & Kristina Matuzeviciute, 2021. "A New Approach to Examine Non-Linear and Mediated Growth and Convergence Outcomes of Cohesion Policy," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Sophia Davidova & Lena Fredriksson & Matthew Gorton & Plamen Mishev & Dan Petrovici, 2012. "Subsistence Farming, Incomes, and Agricultural Livelihoods in the New Member States of the European Union," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(2), pages 209-227, April.
    14. Jingxiao Zhang & Qiaoling Liu & Chao Wang & Hui Li, 2017. "Spatial–Temporal Modeling for Regional Economic Development: A Quantitative Analysis with Panel Data from Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-25, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ene:journl:y:2015:p:173-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ludmila Shashula (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economics-of-nature.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.