IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekz/ekonoz/2007106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Agenda 21 in Europe. The second phase of ecological modernisation in local government (English version)

Author

Listed:
  • Marko Joas

    (Abo Akademi University)

  • Bob Evans

    (Northumbria University)

  • Kate Theobald

    (Northumbria University)

Abstract

Ecological modernisation as a theoretical construction has mainly dealt with changes on a national level and in connection with industrial and economic development. However, the role of local government has also increasingly become one feature of interest within the modernisation process. Local level governance plays a crucial role especially concerning the second phase of modernisation — that of involving inhabitants, stakeholder groups and smaller production units towards a common goal of sustainable development. Many of these activities in Europe are conducted under the organisational headline of Local Agenda 21. European local governments have been in the forefront of taking up the new challenge. In this paper we will show how local governments in different parts of Europe have responded to this task. The empirical material will be based on our large dataset collected within DISCUS research project.

Suggested Citation

  • Marko Joas & Bob Evans & Kate Theobald, 2007. "Local Agenda 21 in Europe. The second phase of ecological modernisation in local government (English version)," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 64(01), pages 92-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekz:ekonoz:2007106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ogasun.ejgv.euskadi.eus/r51-k86aekon/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/downloadPDF?R01HNoPortal=true&idpubl=59®istro=835
    File Function: complete text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bob Evans & Marko Joas & Susan Sundback & Kate Theobald, 2006. "Governing local sustainability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 849-867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmen Echebarria & Jose M Barrutia & Itziar Aguado, 2009. "The ISC Framework: Modelling Drivers for the Degree of Local Agenda 21 Implantation in Western Europe," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(4), pages 980-995, April.
    2. Jose M Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria, 2011. "Explaining and Measuring the Embrace of Local Agenda 21s by Local Governments," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(2), pages 451-469, February.
    3. José M. Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria, 2010. "Developing a New Framework to Explain Transverse Evolution of Knowledge‐Driven Regional Policy Networks," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 906-924, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Carmen Echebarria & Jose M. Barrutia, 2013. "Factors Affecting the Attitude of Local Authorities towards Local Agenda 21," ERSA conference papers ersa13p1082, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Karla Guzmán Fernández & Ana I. Moreno-Calles & Alejandro Casas & José Blancas, 2020. "Contributions of Urban Collective Gardens to Local Sustainability in Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Alma Elisabeth Peirson & Gina Ziervogel, 2021. "Sanitation Upgrading as Climate Action: Lessons for Local Government from a Community Informal Settlement Project in Cape Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Beau Warbroek & Thomas Hoppe, 2017. "Modes of Governing and Policy of Local and Regional Governments Supporting Local Low-Carbon Energy Initiatives; Exploring the Cases of the Dutch Regions of Overijssel and Fryslân," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, January.
    6. Paul, Bénédique, 2009. "Reclaiming Institutions as a Form of Capital," MPRA Paper 39017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Isabel M. Garcia-Sanchez & Jose-Manuel Prado-Lorenzo, 2008. "Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 17-34.
    8. Jenny Palm & Karolina Södergren & Nancy Bocken, 2019. "The Role of Cities in the Sharing Economy: Exploring Modes of Governance in Urban Sharing Practices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    9. William Blomquist & Elinor Ostrom, 2008. "Deliberation, learning, and institutional change: the evolution of institutions in judicial settings," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 180-202, September.
    10. Muyeba, Singumbe, 2019. "Institutional capital, urban poverty and household wealth in Cape Town," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    11. Natalia Krasnoshtanova, 2023. "Sustainability of Local Communities in a New Oil and Gas Region: The Case of Eastern Siberia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Thomas Hoppe & Arjen Van der Vegt & Peter Stegmaier, 2016. "Presenting a Framework to Analyze Local Climate Policy and Action in Small and Medium-Sized Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-41, August.
    13. Inge Panneels, 2023. "The Quintuple Bottom Line: A Framework for Place-Based Sustainable Enterprise in the Craft Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Shona Johnstone & Rosalyn A. V. Robison & Rachel Manning, 2013. "Delivering Social Sustainability Outcomes in New Communities: The Role of the Elected Councillor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-29, November.
    15. Muhammad Hasnan Habib & Hayati Sari Hasibuan & Kemas Ridwan Kurniawan, 2023. "Cultural Space as Sustainability Indicator for Development Planning (Case Study in Jakarta Coastal Area)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Soyoung Han & Yoonku Kwon, 2019. "Awareness and Attitude of College Students Majoring in Landscape Architecture towards the Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Paul, Bénédique, 2009. "Institutional capital: A new analytical framework on theory and actions for economic development," MPRA Paper 39018, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Adriano Ferreira Souza & Alan Cavalcanti Cunha & Helenilza Ferreira Albuquerque Cunha, 2021. "The environmental attitude of the urban population living in Macapá City, Brazilian Amazon region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15100-15117, October.
    19. Mihaela Alexandra Tudor & Anamaria Filimon Benea & Stefan Bratosin, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown and Religious Mediatization of Social Sustainability. A Case Study of Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Jose M. Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria & Patrick Hartmann & Vanessa Apaolaza & Ainhize Eletxigerra & Alexander Velez, 2015. "Towards Territorial Sustainability Systems: A step forward," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1238, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ecological modernisation; environmental governance; local agenda 21; local/government authorities; sustainable development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekz:ekonoz:2007106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iñaki Treviño (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debages.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.