IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eko/ekoeko/39_61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suggested changes of system of financing the EU budget: conclusions for Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Elżbieta Kawecka-Wyrzykowska

Abstract

Against the background of the present system of financing the EU budget, proposals of two new taxes presented by the European Commission in the framework of the Multiannual financial framework 2014-2020 were discussed: the modified resource based on VAT (the so called new VAT) and a new proposal of the financial transactions tax (FTT). Both tax proposals were assessed from the point of view of theoretical criteria of an optimal financing of the budget. Next, Poland’s position on those two proposals was presented. Concluding remarks stress that both, from the point of view of the EU budget and of Polish interests, FTT would be a better budgetary resource.

Suggested Citation

  • Elżbieta Kawecka-Wyrzykowska, 2014. "Suggested changes of system of financing the EU budget: conclusions for Poland," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 39.
    • Handle: RePEc:eko:ekoeko:39_61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ekonomia.wne.uw.edu.pl/ekonomia/getFile/749
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maciej Cieslukowski & Rui Henrique Alves, 2006. "Financial Autonomy of the European Union after Enlargement," FEP Working Papers 217, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    2. Jacques Le Cacheux, 2010. "Funding the EU Budget with a Genuine Own Resource : The Case for a European Tax," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01880264, HAL.
    3. Philippe Cattoir, 2004. "Tax-based EU own resources: an assessment," Taxation Papers 1, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission, revised Apr 2004.
    4. Haug, Jutta & Lamassoure, Alain & Verhofstadt, Guy & Gros, Daniel & De Grauwe, Paul & Ricard-Nihoul, Ga�tane & Rubio, Eulalia, 2011. "Europe for Growth: For a Radical Change in Financing the EU," CEPS Papers 4374, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    5. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2013. "The EU own resources system — Reform needs and options," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 48(5), pages 303-313, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Krenek & Mark Sommer & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2019. "Sustainability-oriented Future EU Funding. A European Border Carbon Adjustment," WIFO Working Papers 587, WIFO.
    2. Veronika Solilová & Danuše Nerudová, 2018. "Výnosový potenciál společného konsolidovaného korporátního základu daně v Evropské unii [Revenue Potential of the CCCTB in the European Union]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(1), pages 78-98.
    3. Friedrich Heinemann & Philipp Mohl & Steffen Osterloh, 2009. "Who’s afraid of an EU tax and why?—revenue system preferences in the European Parliament," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 73-99, March.
    4. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2017. "The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), its Structure and the Own Resources," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60722, April.
    5. Margit Schratzenstaller & Alexander Krenek, 2016. "Sustainability-oriented EU Taxes:The Example of a European Carbon-based Flight Ticket Tax," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58888, April.
    6. Alexander Krenek & Mark Sommer & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2021. "A WTO-compatible Border Tax Adjustment for the ETS to Finance the EU Budget," WIFO Working Papers 596, WIFO.
    7. Alexander Hudetz & Ann Mumford & Danuse Nerudová & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2017. "Reform needs and options in the EU system of own resources," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 609-613, November.
    8. Andrea Gebauer & Chang Woon Nam & Rüdiger Parsche, 2006. "VAT Evasion and Its Consequences for Macroeconomic Clearing in the EU," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 61(4), pages 462-487, February.
    9. Indhira Santos & Susanne Neheider, 2009. "Reframing the EU budget- decision-making process," Working Papers 306, Bruegel.
    10. Jorge Núñez Ferrer & Jacques Le Cacheux & Giacomo Benedetto & Mathieu Saunier & Fabien Candau & Claude Emonnot & Florence Lachet-Touya & Jorgen Mortensen & Aymeric Potteau & Igor Taranic, 2016. "Study on the potential and limitations of reforming the financing of the EU budget [Perspectives et limites pour réformer le financement du budget de l’UE]," Working Papers hal-01848029, HAL.
    11. Iain Begg, 2007. "The 2008/2009 review of the EU budget: Real or cosmetic?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(01), pages 45-50, April.
    12. Tim Goedemé & Wim Van Lancker, 2009. "A Guaranteed Minimum Income for EuropeÂ’’s Elderly. Options and Pitfalls in the Design of a Harmonised Basic Pension Scheme in the European Union," Working Papers 0901, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    13. Éloi Laurent & Jacques Le Cacheux, 2008. "Présidence française de l'Union européenne : priorité à la lutte contre le changement climatique," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(3), pages 5-28.
    14. Maciej Cieslukowski & Rui Henrique Alves, 2006. "Financial Autonomy of the European Union after Enlargement," FEP Working Papers 217, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    15. Spengel, Christoph & Heckemeyer, Jost Henrich & Bräutigam, Rainer & Nicolay, Katharina & Klar, Oliver & Stutzenberger, Kathrin, 2016. "The effects of tax reforms to address the debt-equity bias on the cost of capital and on effective tax rates," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, volume 65, number 148156.
    16. Lannoo, Karel, 2011. "EU Federalism in Crisis," CEPS Papers 6498, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    17. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2020. "Reformbedarf und Reformoptionen für das EU-Budget aus österreichischer Perspektive," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 93(3), pages 177-191, March.
    18. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6147 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Kengyel, Ákos, 2019. "Az Európai Unió költségvetésének jövője a 2021-2027-es többéves pénzügyi keret tükrében [The future of the EU budget in the light of the 2021-2027 multi-annual financial framework]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 521-550.
    20. Jacques Le Cacheux, 2007. "Le nerf de la guerre (économique) : Les faiblesses du budget européen," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 89(3), pages 71-87.
    21. Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta, 2020. "Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–2027," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(3), pages 193-208, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eko:ekoeko:39_61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.