IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ege/journl/v16y2016i4p675-686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yesil Bilisim: Bir Kamu Kurumu Ornegi ve Politika Onerileri

Author

Listed:
  • Yilmaz GOKSEN

    (Dokuz Eylul Universitesi)

  • Muhammet DAMAR

    (Dokuz Eylul Universitesi)

  • Onur DOGAN

    (Dokuz Eylul Universitesi)

Abstract

Iklim degisikligi ve kuresel isinma gunumuzde insanoglunun yuzlestigi en onemli cevre sorunlarindan biridir. Dunyamiz, kuresel isinma ve iklim degisikliginin olumsuz etkileri ile her gecen gun daha siddetli yuzlesmektedir. Dogal kaynaklarimiz bu sekilde tuketilirse, gezegenimizin orta ve uzun vadede ihtiyaca cevap veremeyecegi tahmin edilmektedir. Bu nedenle, tedbir almak, is yapis sekillerimizi degistirmek, dogaya olumsuz etkimizi minimize etmek, onemli bir unsur haline gelmektedir. Bilisim teknolojileri, bu zorlu sorunun cozumundeki anahtar unsur olarak karsimiza cikmaktadir. Bilgi ve iletisim teknolojileri, kuresel isinma, iklim degisikligi, sanayi atiklari gibi cevresel tehditler icin en onemli mucadele araci olarak karsimiza cikmaktadir. Turkiye’de kamu kurumlari, enerji tuketimi, teknolojik urunlerin satin alinmasi, kullanimi, sureclerin iyilestirilmesi adina onemli bir potansiyele sahiptir. Calisma, kamu bilgi islem birimlerinin bilgi islem sureclerini, yesil bilisim yaklasimiyla ele alarak, politika onerileri ortaya koymayi amaclamistir. Calismada, ornek bir kamu bilgi islem biriminin sahip oldugu bilgi sistemleri ve teknoloji ile altyapisinin bir envanteri cikarilacaktir. Bu envanterin hakim elemanlarinin muhtemel cevresel etkileri, sistematik bir sekilde degerlendirilecektir. Kamu calisanlarinin yesil bilgi islem algisi, kurum ici yesil bilisim politikasi, iletisim teknoloji araclarinin satin alinmasi, geri donusumu, laboratuvarlarinin tasarimi, enerji tuketimi, projelerin sanallastirilmasi, sunucu odalarinin durumu, yesil universite ve kurumlar konusunda yapilabilecekler, literatur cercevesinde Turkiye’den ve Dunya’dan ornekler ile ortaya konulacaktir. Calismanin yesil bilisim konusunda bireysel ve orgutsel farkindaligin artirmasi, yesil bilisim gibi onemli bir konunun yukarida vurgulanan konular temelinde ele almasi acisindan onemli oldugu dunusulmektedir.

Suggested Citation

  • Yilmaz GOKSEN & Muhammet DAMAR & Onur DOGAN, 2016. "Yesil Bilisim: Bir Kamu Kurumu Ornegi ve Politika Onerileri," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 16(4), pages 673-686.
    • Handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:16:y:2016:i:4:p:675-686
    DOI: 10.21121/eab.2016.478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/MakaleDosyalari/51/PDF2016_4_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/eab/arsiv/arsivDetay.aspx?yil=2016&peryot=4
    File Function: Website of the journal issue
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21121/eab.2016.478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuart L. Hart & Gautam Ahuja, 1996. "Does It Pay To Be Green? An Empirical Examination Of The Relationship Between Emission Reduction And Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 30-37, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denise M. Keele & Susan DeHart, 2011. "Partners of USEPA Climate Leaders: an Event Study on Stock Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(8), pages 485-497, December.
    2. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    3. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Zahid Yousaf & Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility commitment and participation predict environmental and social performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2578-2587, November.
    4. Evangeline O. Elijido-Ten & Peter Clarkson, 2019. "Going Beyond Climate Change Risk Management: Insights from the World’s Largest Most Sustainable Corporations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1067-1089, July.
    5. Wang, Moran & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Discovering research trends and opportunities of green finance and energy policy: A data-driven scientometric analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Marcello Risitano & Rosaria Romano & Vincenzo Rusciano & Gennaro Civero & Debora Scarpato, 2022. "The impact of sustainability on marketing strategy and business performance: The case of Italian fisheries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1538-1551, May.
    7. Julie Dekker & Tim Hasso, 2016. "Environmental Performance Focus in Private Family Firms: The Role of Social Embeddedness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 293-309, June.
    8. Eng, Li Li & Fikru, Mahelet G. & Vichitsarawong, Thanyaluk, 2021. "The impact of toxic chemical releases and their management on financial performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Myoungjin Oh & Jungwoo Shin & Pil‐Ju Park & Sunmee Kim, 2020. "Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3174-3186, December.
    10. Marcus Wagner, 2004. "The Porter Hypothesis Revisited: A Literature Review of Theoretical Models and Empirical Tests," Public Economics 0407014, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir & Muhammad Yasir & Asad Javed, 2020. "Nexus of institutional pressures, environmentally friendly business strategies, and environmental performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 706-716, March.
    12. Stefan Ambec & Paul Lanoie, 2007. "When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?," CIRANO Working Papers 2007s-20, CIRANO.
    13. Hannu Schadewitz & Mikael Niskala, 2010. "Communication via responsibility reporting and its effect on firm value in Finland," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 96-106, March.
    14. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2021. "Assessing the impact of socially responsible human resources management on company environmental performance and cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1511-1527, September.
    15. Berrone, Pascual & Gelabert, Liliana & Fosfuri, Andrea & Gomez-Mejia, Luis R., 2007. "Can institutional forces create competitive advantage? An empirical examination of environmental innovation," IESE Research Papers D/723, IESE Business School.
    16. Hidemichi Fujii & Kazuyuki Iwata & Shinji Kaneko & Shunsuke Managi, 2013. "Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 187-201, March.
    17. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2021. "Family ownership and stockholder reactions to environmental performance disclosure: A test of secondary agency relationships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2091-2107, May.
    18. Qian, Wei & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2017. "Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 365-379.
    19. Hayam Wahba, 2010. "How do institutional shareholders manipulate corporate environmental strategy to protect their equity value? A study of the adoption of ISO 14001 by Egyptian firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(8), pages 495-511, December.
    20. Petra Andries & Ute Stephan, 2019. "Environmental Innovation and Firm Performance: How Firm Size and Motives Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:16:y:2016:i:4:p:675-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Baris Gök (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiegetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.