IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v144y2020ics1366554520307973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New uncertainty modelling for cargo stowage plans of general cargo ships

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Daihui
  • Qu, Zhuohau
  • Wang, Wenxin
  • Yu, Jiagen
  • Yang, Zaili

Abstract

The current approach to the cargo stowage plans (CSP) of general cargo ships (GCS) is safety-driven, which means that any CSP satisfying minimum safety requirements can be used in practice. Such an approach taking into account no economic and environmental concerns cannot help sustain GCS growth in today’s competitive freight transportation market. This paper introduces a revised evidential reasoning (ER) approach to cope with the complex decision-making problem associated with the CSP of GCS. The complexity mainly results from the dynamic interdependency between the decision criteria and alternatives. The revised ER can determine the functions of the safety-related criteria in the decision making process by considering the extent to which each decision alternative meets the minimum safety requirements. The model is tested in multiple forms by an empirical study using a national GSC loading laboratory, and a real-life application by a shipping company in practice. The results reveals that the new model can aid general ship owners to make sustainable CSPs from a multiple-dimensional perspective and select an optimal CSP based on specific voyage scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Daihui & Qu, Zhuohau & Wang, Wenxin & Yu, Jiagen & Yang, Zaili, 2020. "New uncertainty modelling for cargo stowage plans of general cargo ships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s1366554520307973
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554520307973
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhichao Chen & Tao Chen & Zhuohua Qu & Zaili Yang & Xuewei Ji & Yi Zhou & Hui Zhang, 2018. "Use of evidential reasoning and AHP to assess regional industrial safety," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Christensen, Jonas & Pacino, Dario, 2017. "A matheuristic for the Cargo Mix Problem with Block Stowage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 151-171.
    3. Sadeghi, Aliasghar & Farhad, Hamid & Mohammadzadeh Moghaddam, Abolfazl & Jalili Qazizadeh, Morteza, 2018. "Identification of accident-prone sections in roadways with incomplete and uncertain inspection-based information: A distributed hazard index based on evidential reasoning approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 278-289.
    4. Ding, Ding & Chou, Mabel C., 2015. "Stowage planning for container ships: A heuristic algorithm to reduce the number of shifts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 242-249.
    5. Alexandridis, George & Kavussanos, Manolis G. & Kim, Chi Y. & Tsouknidis, Dimitris A. & Visvikis, Ilias D., 2018. "A survey of shipping finance research: Setting the future research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 164-212.
    6. Parreño, Francisco & Pacino, Dario & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon, 2016. "A GRASP algorithm for the container stowage slot planning problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 141-157.
    7. Z. L. Yang & J. Wang & S. Bonsall & Q. G. Fang, 2009. "Use of Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning in Maritime Security Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 95-120, January.
    8. Zhang, Mei-Jing & Wang, Ying-Ming & Li, Ling-Hui & Chen, Sheng-Qun, 2017. "A general evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 1005-1015.
    9. Gi-Tae Yeo & Adolf K.Y. Ng & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Zaili Yang, 2014. "Modelling port choice in an uncertain environment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 251-267, May.
    10. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili, 2017. "Comparative analysis of port performance indicators: Independency and interdependency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 264-278.
    11. Xu, Dong-Ling & Yang, Jian-Bo & Wang, Ying-Ming, 2006. "The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1914-1943, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byung Kwon Lee & Joyce M. W. Low, 2022. "A constraint programming approach to capacity planning in container vessels," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 415-438, June.
    2. Christensen, Jonas & Erera, Alan & Pacino, Dario, 2019. "A rolling horizon heuristic for the stochastic cargo mix problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 200-220.
    3. Turkay Yildiz, 2019. "Design and Analysis of a Lightweight Composite Shipping Container Made of Carbon Fiber Laminates," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2021. "Joint optimization of container slot planning and truck scheduling for tandem quay cranes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 149-166.
    5. Rune Larsen & Dario Pacino, 2021. "A heuristic and a benchmark for the stowage planning problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 94-122, March.
    6. Shih-Liang Chao & Pi-Hung Lin, 0. "Minimizing overstowage in master bay plans of large container ships," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Shih-Liang Chao & Pi-Hung Lin, 2021. "Minimizing overstowage in master bay plans of large container ships," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 71-93, March.
    8. Fazi, Stefano, 2019. "A decision-support framework for the stowage of maritime containers in inland shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-23.
    9. Zhichao Chen & Tao Chen & Zhuohua Qu & Zaili Yang & Xuewei Ji & Yi Zhou & Hui Zhang, 2018. "Use of evidential reasoning and AHP to assess regional industrial safety," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Karaaslan, Abdulkerim & Gezen, Mesliha, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy resources in Turkey by integer multi-objective selection problem with interval coefficient," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 842-854.
    11. Peng, Peng & Yang, Yu & Lu, Feng & Cheng, Shifen & Mou, Naixia & Yang, Ren, 2018. "Modelling the competitiveness of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road with big data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 852-867.
    12. Dalia Rashed & Amr Eltawil & Mohamed Gheith, 2021. "A Fuzzy Logic-Based Algorithm to Solve the Slot Planning Problem in Container Vessels," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Dong-Ling Xu, 2012. "An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 163-187, May.
    14. Gao, Bin & Ni, Ming-Fang, 2009. "A note on article "The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees"," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 809-812, September.
    15. Sun, Xiaolei & Liu, Chang & Wang, Jun & Li, Jianping, 2020. "Assessing the extreme risk spillovers of international commodities on maritime markets: A GARCH-Copula-CoVaR approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan, 2022. "An extended HEART Dempster–Shafer evidence theory approach to assess human reliability for the gas freeing process on chemical tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    17. Jiang, Meizhi & Lu, Jing, 2020. "The analysis of maritime piracy occurred in Southeast Asia by using Bayesian network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Ni, Lei & Chen, Yu-wang & de Brujin, Oscar, 2021. "Towards understanding socially influenced vaccination decision making: An integrated model of multiple criteria belief modelling and social network analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 276-289.
    19. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    20. Khan, Ashraf & Goodell, John W. & Hassan, M. Kabir & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2022. "A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s1366554520307973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.