IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v20y1986i5p415-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analytical method for aircraft collision risk estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Hockaday, Stephen L. M.
  • Chatziioanou, Alypios

Abstract

Transportation system safety is difficult to assess, particularly when examining future systems that are unlike existing systems. The absence of consensus concerning safety metrics and associated mathematical techniques inhibits implementation of improvements. One method for assessing safety was recently applied to assess new air traffic control procedures. The method contains several steps, including use of a collision risk model. The model uses probability theory to assess collision risk between aircraft due to random deviations from course. Techniques that recognize human monitoring and intervention to avoid collisions must be combined with the model to obtain absolute values of risk. Examples of model application are presented, together with a discussion of model limitations and use.

Suggested Citation

  • Hockaday, Stephen L. M. & Chatziioanou, Alypios, 1986. "An analytical method for aircraft collision risk estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 415-428, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:20:y:1986:i:5:p:415-428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(86)90013-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas R. Willemain, 2003. "Factors Influencing Blind Conflict Risk in En Route Sectors Under Free-Flight Conditions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 457-470, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:20:y:1986:i:5:p:415-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.