IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v133y2020icp159-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain

Author

Listed:
  • Steiner, Ulrich K.
  • Tuljapurkar, Shripad

Abstract

Individuals differ in their life courses, but how this diversity is generated, how it has evolved and how it is maintained is less understood. However, this understanding is crucial to comprehend evolutionary and ecological population dynamics. In structured populations, individual life courses represent sequences of stages that end in death. These life course trajectories or sequences can be described by a Markov chain and individuals diversify over the course of their lives by transitioning through diverse discrete stages. The rate at which stage sequences diversify with age can be quantified by the population entropy of a Markov chain. Here, we derive sensitivities of the population entropy of a Markov chain to identify which stage transitions generate – or contribute – most to diversification in stage sequences, i.e. life courses. We then use these sensitivities to reveal potential selective forces on the dynamics of life courses. To do so we correlated the sensitivity of each matrix element (stage transition) with respect to the population entropy, to its sensitivity with respect to fitness λ, the population growth rate. Positive correlation between the two sensitivities would suggest that the stage transitions that selection has acted most strongly on (high sensitivities with respect to λ) are also those that contributed most to the diversification of life courses. Using an illustrative example on a seabird population, the Thick-billed Murres on Coats Island, that is structured by reproductive stages, we show that the most influential stage transitions for diversification of life courses are not correlated with the most influential transitions for population growth. Our finding suggests that observed diversification in life courses is neutral rather than adaptive, note this does not imply that the life histories themselves are not adaptive. We are at an early stage of understanding how individual level dynamics shape ecological and evolutionary dynamics, and many discoveries await.

Suggested Citation

  • Steiner, Ulrich K. & Tuljapurkar, Shripad, 2020. "Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 159-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:133:y:2020:i:c:p:159-167
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580920300034
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2020.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vuilleumier, S. & Goudet, J. & Perrin, N., 2010. "Evolution in heterogeneous populations: From migration models to fixation probabilities," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(4), pages 250-258.
    2. Barton, N.H. & Etheridge, A.M. & Véber, A., 2017. "The infinitesimal model: Definition, derivation, and implications," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 50-73.
    3. Roze, Denis & Rousset, François, 2008. "Multilocus models in the infinite island model of population structure," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(4), pages 529-542.
    4. Ulrich K. Steiner & Anthony J. Gaston, 2005. "Reproductive consequences of natal dispersal in a highly philopatric seabird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 634-639, May.
    5. Der, Ricky & Epstein, Charles L. & Plotkin, Joshua B., 2011. "Generalized population models and the nature of genetic drift," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 80-99.
    6. Brett A. Melbourne & Alan Hastings, 2008. "Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7200), pages 100-103, July.
    7. Geoghegan, Jemma L. & Spencer, Hamish G., 2012. "Population-epigenetic models of selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 232-242.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Méndez, Vicenç & Llopis, Isaac & Campos, Daniel & Horsthemke, Werner, 2010. "Extinction conditions for isolated populations affected by environmental stochasticity," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(4), pages 250-256.
    2. Vilenkin, Boris & Chikatunov, Vladimir I. & Pavlíček, Tomáš, 2009. "The pattern of species turnover resulting from stochastic population dynamics: The model and field data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 657-661.
    3. Barton, N.H. & Etheridge, A.M., 2018. "Establishment in a new habitat by polygenic adaptation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 110-127.
    4. Zhao, Yu & Yuan, Sanling, 2016. "Stability in distribution of a stochastic hybrid competitive Lotka–Volterra model with Lévy jumps," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 98-109.
    5. Anna Kuparinen & Robert B O'Hara & Juha Merilä, 2008. "Probabilistic Models for Continuous Ontogenetic Transition Processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(11), pages 1-7, November.
    6. Eriksson, A. & Elías-Wolff, F. & Mehlig, B., 2013. "Metapopulation dynamics on the brink of extinction," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 101-122.
    7. Gledhill, Michelle & Van Kirk, Robert W., 2011. "Modeling effects of toxin exposure in fish on long-term population size, with an application to selenium toxicity in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(19), pages 3587-3597.
    8. Eldon, Bjarki & Stephan, Wolfgang, 2018. "Evolution of highly fecund haploid populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 48-56.
    9. Eleanor S Devenish-Nelson & Philip A Stephens & Stephen Harris & Carl Soulsbury & Shane A Richards, 2013. "Does Litter Size Variation Affect Models of Terrestrial Carnivore Extinction Risk and Management?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Izquierdo, Salvador & Dopazo, César & Fueyo, Norberto, 2010. "Supply-cost curves for geographically distributed renewable-energy resources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 667-672, January.
    11. Arianna Passarotto & Chiara Morosinotto & Jon E Brommer & Esa Aaltonen & Kari Ahola & Teuvo Karstinen & Patrik Karell, 2022. "Cold winters have morph-specific effects on natal dispersal distance in a wild raptor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(2), pages 419-427.
    12. Manuel Plate & Richard Bernstein & Andreas Hoppe & Kaspar Bienefeld, 2019. "Comparison of infinitesimal and finite locus models for long-term breeding simulations with direct and maternal effects at the example of honeybees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Vuilleumier, Séverine & Possingham, Hugh P., 2012. "Interacting populations in heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 96-105.
    14. Thomas W. Scott & Alan Grafen & Stuart A. West, 2022. "Multiple social encounters can eliminate Crozier’s paradox and stabilise genetic kin recognition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Geoghegan, Jemma L. & Spencer, Hamish G., 2013. "The adaptive invasion of epialleles in a heterogeneous environment," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Jacob LaRiviere & David Kling & James N Sanchirico & Charles Sims & Michael Springborn, 2018. "The Treatment of Uncertainty and Learning in the Economics of Natural Resource and Environmental Management," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 92-112.
    17. Dekens, L. & Otto, S.P. & Calvez, V., 2022. "The best of both worlds: Combining population genetic and quantitative genetic models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-75.
    18. Rousset, François & Kirkpatrick, Mark & Guerrero, Rafael F., 2014. "Matrix inversions for chromosomal inversions: A method to construct summary statistics in complex coalescent models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Duncan Ingram & Guy-Bart Stan, 2023. "Modelling genetic stability in engineered cell populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Van Cleve, Jeremy, 2015. "Social evolution and genetic interactions in the short and long term," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 2-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:133:y:2020:i:c:p:159-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.