IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v57y2019icp46-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Persistent peers and the rhetoric of state economic competition

Author

Listed:
  • Schwarzkopf, David L.

Abstract

State economic development agencies and politicians often express concern about their state's technology-based economic development (TBED) by framing it in terms of a competition with other states. States can focus their competitive efforts if they know who their peers are. Knowing a state's peers also allows development agencies to identify likely targets for borrowing or adapting development practices. This study examines the relative progress of the 50 states on a series of 53 TBED measures published by the National Science Foundation. All states report improvement in over more than half of the variables used in the study, with over 60% of the states moving in the same direction on 80% of the measures. Clusters based on self-organizing maps show 37 states change cluster membership over the measurement period of approximately 12 years, yet all states have at least one “persistent peer”—a state that they are similar with at both the beginning and the end of the period. The combination of large-scale similar movement and the presence of persistent peers sets limits on talk of TBED progress framed by a zero-sum or “leapfrog” rhetoric. Indeed, looking at TBED as a zero-sum game deflects attention from the state's particular strengths and masks the true progress the state has made on its citizens' behalf.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwarzkopf, David L., 2019. "Persistent peers and the rhetoric of state economic competition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 46-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:46-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X18302094
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peppard, P.E. & Kindig, D.A. & Dranger, E. & Jovaag, A. & Remington, P.L., 2008. "Ranking community health status to stimulate discussion of local public health issues: The Wisconsin County health rankings," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 209-212.
    2. Jeremy L. Hall, 2009. "Adding Meaning to Measurement," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-12, February.
    3. Schwarzkopf, David L., 2014. "Identifying peer states to assess technology-based economic development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 68-76.
    4. Robert M. O'Brien, 2017. "Dropping Highly Collinear Variables from a Model: Why it Typically is Not a Good Idea," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(1), pages 360-375, March.
    5. Lars Carlsen & Rainer Bruggemann, 2014. "The ‘Failed State Index’ Offers More than Just a Simple Ranking," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 525-530, January.
    6. Jeremy L. Hall, 2007. "Developing Historical 50-State Indices of Innovation Capacity and Commercialization Capacity," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 21(2), pages 107-123, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimo Buscema & Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli, 2016. "Multidimensional Similarities at a Global Scale: An Approach to Mapping Open Society Orientations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1239-1258, September.
    2. Jeremy L. Hall, 2010. "The Distribution of Federal Economic Development Grant Funds: A Consideration of Need and the Urban/Rural Divide," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 24(4), pages 311-324, November.
    3. Courtemanche, Charles & Soneji, Samir & Tchernis, Rusty, 2013. "Modeling Area-Level Health Rankings," IZA Discussion Papers 7631, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Jeffrey M. Keisler & Christy M. Foran & Maija M. Kuklja & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Undue concentration of research and education: multi-criteria decision approach to assess jurisdiction eligibility for NSF funding," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 367-378, September.
    5. Lars Carlsen & Rainer Bruggemann, 2017. "Fragile State Index: Trends and Developments. A Partial Order Data Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Jeremy L. Hall, 2009. "Adding Meaning to Measurement," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-12, February.
    7. Nesson, Erik T. & Robinson, Joshua J., 2015. "An information theory based framework for the measurement of population health," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 86-103.
    8. Lars Carlsen, 2017. "An Alternative View on Distribution Keys for the Possible Relocation of Refugees in the European Union," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 1147-1163, February.
    9. Fenton Villar, Paul, 2020. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and trust in politicians," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Jincheng Jiang & Jinsong Chen & Wei Tu & Chisheng Wang, 2019. "A Novel Effective Indicator of Weighted Inter-City Human Mobility Networks to Estimate Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    11. McCarthy, Ian M., 2016. "Eliminating composite bias in treatment effects estimates: Applications to quality of life assessment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-58.
    12. Annamaria Bianchi & Silvia Biffignandi, 2022. "Workplace Social Environment Indicator: A Comparative Analysis of European Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 669-688, June.
    13. Anna I. Efimova, 2018. "Illicit Transnational Enterprises and the State," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 11(1).
    14. repec:rre:publsh:v:38:y:2008:i:2:p:121-43 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Charles D. Taylor, 2012. "Governors as Economic Problem Solvers," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 26(3), pages 267-276, August.
    16. Jeremy L. Hall & Christopher E. Bartels, 2014. "Management Practice Variation in Tax Increment Financing Districts," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(3), pages 270-282, August.
    17. Marta Kuc-Czarnecka & Samuele Lo Piano & Andrea Saltelli, 2020. "Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 775-802, June.
    18. Geiguen Shin & Jeremy L. Hall, 2018. "Exploring the Influence of Federal Welfare Expenditures on State-Level New Economy Development Performance: Drawing From the Diffusion of Innovation Theory," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(3), pages 242-256, August.
    19. David L. Barkley & Rebekka M. Dudensing, 2011. "Industrial Legacy Matters: Implications for the Development and Use of Indices of Regional Competitiveness," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(2), pages 130-142, May.
    20. Maria Kaneva & Galina Untura, 2017. "Innovation indicators and regional growth in Russia," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 133-159, May.
    21. Lars Carlsen & Rainer Bruggemann, 2021. "Gender Equality in Europe: The Development of the Sustainable Development Goal No. 5 Illustrated by Exemplary Cases," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 1127-1151, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:46-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.