IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v181y2022ics0040162522002888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To trust or not to trust? An assessment of trust in AI-based systems: Concerns, ethics and contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Omrani, Nessrine
  • Rivieccio, Giorgia
  • Fiore, Ugo
  • Schiavone, Francesco
  • Agreda, Sergio Garcia

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) characterizes a new generation of technologies capable of interacting with the environment and aiming to simulate human intelligence. The success of integrating AI into organizations critically depends on workers' trust in AI technology. Trust is a central component of the interaction between people and AI, as incorrect levels of trust may cause misuse, abuse or disuse of the technology. The European Commission's High-level Expert Group on AI (HLEG) have adopted the position that we should establish a relationship of trust with AI and should cultivate trustworthy AI. This article investigates the links between trust in AI, concerns related to AI use, and the ethics related to such use. We used data collected in 2019 from more than 30,000 individuals across the EU28. The data focuses on living conditions, trust, and AI uses and concerns. An econometric model is used. The endogenous variable is an ordered measure of trust in AI. We use an ordered logit model to highlight the factors associated with an increased level of trust in AI in Europe. The results show that many concerns related to AI use are linked to AI trust, and the ability to try out AI applications will also have an impact on initial trust. To enhance trust, practitioners can try to maximize the technological features in AI systems. The representation of the AI as a humanoid or a loyal pet (e.g., a dog) will facilitate initial trust formation. Moreover, findings reveal an unequal degree of trust in AI across countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Omrani, Nessrine & Rivieccio, Giorgia & Fiore, Ugo & Schiavone, Francesco & Agreda, Sergio Garcia, 2022. "To trust or not to trust? An assessment of trust in AI-based systems: Concerns, ethics and contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:181:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522002888
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522002888
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Milad Mirbabaie & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Lennart Hofeditz, 2021. "Ethical Management of Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Yulia Sullivan & Marc Bourmont & Mary Dunaway, 2022. "Appraisals of harms and injustice trigger an eerie feeling that decreases trust in artificial intelligence systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 525-548, January.
    3. Patricia Baudier & Galina Kondrateva & Chantal Ammi & Victor Chang & Francesco Schiavone, 2021. "Patients’ perceptions of teleconsultation during COVID-19: a cross-national study," Post-Print hal-03052149, HAL.
    4. Ugo Fiore & Adrian Florea & Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Paolo Zanetti, 2021. "Digitization, Epistemic Proximity, and the Education System: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Leone, Daniele & Schiavone, Francesco & Appio, Francesco Paolo & Chiao, Benjamin, 2021. "How does artificial intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 849-859.
    6. Wenjuan Fan & Jingnan Liu & Shuwan Zhu & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Investigating the impacting factors for the healthcare professionals to adopt artificial intelligence-based medical diagnosis support system (AIMDSS)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 567-592, November.
    7. A. Atabekov & O. Yastrebov, 2018. "Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence Across Countries: Legislation on the Move," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 773-782.
    8. Carbonneau, Real & Laframboise, Kevin & Vahidov, Rustam, 2008. "Application of machine learning techniques for supply chain demand forecasting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1140-1154, February.
    9. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksandr Vyshnevskyi & Henryk Dzwigol, 2020. "Digitalization of the EU Economies and People at Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Baudier, Patricia & Kondrateva, Galina & Ammi, Chantal & Chang, Victor & Schiavone, Francesco, 2021. "Patients’ perceptions of teleconsultation during COVID-19: A cross-national study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Hooks, D. & Davis, Z. & Agrawal, V. & Li, Z., 2022. "Exploring factors influencing technology adoption rate at the macro level: A predictive model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Soheyl Khalilpourazari & Shima Soltanzadeh & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Sankar Kumar Roy, 2020. "Designing an efficient blood supply chain network in crisis: neural learning, optimization and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(1), pages 123-152, June.
    13. Shareef, Mahmud Akhter & Kumar, Vinod & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Kumar, Uma & Akram, Muhammad Shakaib & Raman, Ramakrishnan, 2021. "A new health care system enabled by machine intelligence: Elderly people's trust or losing self control," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Jefferson Duarte & Stephan Siegel & Lance Young, 2012. "Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(8), pages 2455-2484.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chaturvedi, Rijul & Verma, Sanjeev & Das, Ronnie & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Social companionship with artificial intelligence: Recent trends and future avenues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frishammar, Johan & Essén, Anna & Bergström, Frida & Ekman, Tilda, 2023. "Digital health platforms for the elderly? Key adoption and usage barriers and ways to address them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Han, Chunjia & Yang, Mu & Piterou, Athena, 2021. "Do news media and citizens have the same agenda on COVID-19? an empirical comparison of twitter posts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Ruhul Amin & Abdullah Al Masud & Md. Imran Hossain & Mohammad Awal Hossen & Mohammad Kamal Hossain, 2023. "What Drives People’s Behavioral Intention Toward Telemedicine? An Emerging Economy Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    4. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Donvito, Raffaele, 2023. "Pharmacists' attitudes and intention to adopt telemedicine: Integrating the market-orientation paradigm and the UTAUT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Ido Morag & Efrat Kedmi-Shahar & Dana Arad, 2023. "Remote Communications between Patients and General Practitioners: Do Patients Choose the Most Effective Communication Routes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Chauhan, Ankur & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta, 2022. "Implications for sustainable healthcare operations in embracing telemedicine services during a pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Prabh Deep Singh & Rajbir Kaur & Kiran Deep Singh & Gaurav Dhiman, 2021. "A Novel Ensemble-based Classifier for Detecting the COVID-19 Disease for Infected Patients," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1385-1401, December.
    8. Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zamani, Mehdi & Daim, Tugrul U. & Sharma, Mahak & Yalcin, Haydar, 2022. "Conceptual structure and perspectives on “innovation management”: A bibliometric review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Eka Pramudita & Hendra Achmadi & Hansa Nurhaida, 2023. "Determinants of behavioral intention toward telemedicine services among Indonesian Gen-Z and Millenials: a PLS–SEM study on Alodokter application," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Capponi, Giovanna & Corrocher, Nicoletta, 2022. "Patterns of collaboration in mHealth: A network analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Jörg Prokop & Dandan Wang, 2022. "Is there a gender gap in equity-based crowdfunding?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1219-1244, October.
    12. Costello, Anna M. & Down, Andrea K. & Mehta, Mihir N., 2020. "Machine + man: A field experiment on the role of discretion in augmenting AI-based lending models," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    13. Jens Hagendorff & Sonya Lim & Duc Duy Nguyen, 2023. "Lender Trust and Bank Loan Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1758-1779, March.
    14. Bertrand, Jérémie & Burietz, Aurore, 2023. "(Loan) price and (loan officer) prejudice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 26-42.
    15. Manconi, Alberto & Braggion, Fabio & Zhu, Haikun, 2018. "Can Technology Undermine Macroprudential Regulation? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Credit in China," CEPR Discussion Papers 12668, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Sangho Lee & Youngdoo Son, 2021. "Motor Load Balancing with Roll Force Prediction for a Cold-Rolling Setup with Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Xuan Zhang, 2023. "The impact of digital finance on corporate labor productivity: evidence from Chinese-listed companies," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(3), pages 527-550, September.
    18. Lyudmyla Starostyuk & Kay-Yut Chen & Edmund L. Prater, 2023. "Do looks matter in supply chain contracting? An experimental study," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 58(1), pages 9-23, January.
    19. Ines Gharbi & Mounira Hamed‐Sidhom & Khaled Hussainey & Janet Ganouati, 2021. "Religiosity and financial distress in U.S. firms," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3902-3915, July.
    20. Croux, Christophe & Jagtiani, Julapa & Korivi, Tarunsai & Vulanovic, Milos, 2020. "Important factors determining Fintech loan default: Evidence from a lendingclub consumer platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 270-296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:181:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522002888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.