IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v176y2022ics004016252100901x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The manipulation of Euribor: An analysis with machine learning classification techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Herrera, Rubén
  • Climent, Francisco
  • Carmona, Pedro
  • Momparler, Alexandre

Abstract

The manipulation of the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor) was an affair which had a great impact on international financial markets. This study tests whether advanced data processing techniques are capable of classifying Euribor panel banks as either manipulating or non-manipulating on the basis of patterns found in quotes submissions. For this purpose, panel banks’ daily contributions have been studied and monthly variables obtained that denote different contribution patterns for Euribor panel banks. Thus, in accordance with the court verdict, banks are categorized as manipulating and non-manipulating and Machine Learning classification techniques such as Supervised Learning, Anomaly Detection and Cluster Analysis are applied in order to discriminate between convicted and acquitted banks. The results show that out of seven manipulative banks, five are detected by Machine Learning using Deep Learning algorithms, all five presenting very similar contribution patterns. This is consistent with Anomaly Detection which confirms that several manipulating banks present similar levels of abnormality in their contributions. In addition, the Cluster Analysis facilitates gathering the five most active banks in illicit actions. In conclusion, administrators and supervisors might find these techniques useful to detect potentially illicit actions by banks involved in the Euribor rate-setting process.

Suggested Citation

  • Herrera, Rubén & Climent, Francisco & Carmona, Pedro & Momparler, Alexandre, 2022. "The manipulation of Euribor: An analysis with machine learning classification techniques," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:176:y:2022:i:c:s004016252100901x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252100901X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krauss, Christopher & Do, Xuan Anh & Huck, Nicolas, 2017. "Deep neural networks, gradient-boosted trees, random forests: Statistical arbitrage on the S&P 500," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 689-702.
    2. Alexander Eisl & Rainer Jankowitsch & Marti G. Subrahmanyam, 2017. "The Manipulation Potential of Libor and Euribor," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(4), pages 604-647, September.
    3. Christopher Krauss & Anh Do & Nicolas Huck, 2017. "Deep neural networks, gradient-boosted trees, random forests: Statistical arbitrage on the S&P 500," Post-Print hal-01768895, HAL.
    4. Gan, Lirong & Wang, Huamao & Yang, Zhaojun, 2020. "Machine learning solutions to challenges in finance: An application to the pricing of financial products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Priyank Gandhi & Benjamin Golez & Jens Carsten Jackwerth & Alberto Plazzi, 2019. "Financial Market Misconduct and Public Enforcement: The Case of Libor Manipulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(11), pages 5268-5289, November.
    6. Rodríguez-López, Araceli & Fernández-Abascal, Hermenegildo & Maté-García, Jorge-Julio & Rodríguez-Fernández, José-Miguel & Rojo-García, José-Luis & Sanz-Gómez, José-Antonio, 2021. "Evaluating Euribor Manipulation: Effects on Mortgage Borrowers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    7. Nuria Boot & Timo Klein & Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2017. "Collusive Benchmark Rates Fixing," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-122/VII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 17 Apr 2019.
    8. Darrell Duffie & Jeremy C. Stein, 2015. "Reforming LIBOR and Other Financial Market Benchmarks," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 191-212, Spring.
    9. Jabeur, Sami Ben & Gharib, Cheima & Mefteh-Wali, Salma & Arfi, Wissal Ben, 2021. "CatBoost model and artificial intelligence techniques for corporate failure prediction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. David Hou Author-Name: David Skeie, 2013. "LIBOR: origins, economics, crisis, scandal and reform," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,, Palgrave Macmillan.
    11. Carmona, Pedro & Climent, Francisco & Momparler, Alexandre, 2019. "Predicting failure in the U.S. banking sector: An extreme gradient boosting approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 304-323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuria Boot & Timo Klein & Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2017. "Collusive Benchmark Rates Fixing," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-122/VII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 17 Apr 2019.
    2. Thomas B. King & Kurt F. Lewis, 2020. "Credit Risk, Liquidity, and Lies," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 16(5), pages 219-267, October.
    3. Kirti, Divya, 2022. "What are reference rates for?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Nuria Boot & Timo Klein & Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2017. "Collusive Benchmark Rates Fixing," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1715, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Li, Ming & Sun, Hang & Zong, Jichuan, 2021. "Intertemporal imitation behavior of interbank offered rate submissions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Ben Jabeur, Sami & Serret, Vanessa, 2023. "Bankruptcy prediction using fuzzy convolutional neural networks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Pontines, Victor & Rummel, Ole, 2023. "LIBOR meets machine learning: A Lasso regression approach to detecting data irregularities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    8. Robert Jarrow & Siguang Li, 2023. "Interest rate swaps: a comparison of compounded daily versus discrete reference rates," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Matthew Harding & Gabriel F. R. Vasconcelos, 2022. "Managers versus Machines: Do Algorithms Replicate Human Intuition in Credit Ratings?," Papers 2202.04218, arXiv.org.
    10. Jabeur, Sami Ben & Gharib, Cheima & Mefteh-Wali, Salma & Arfi, Wissal Ben, 2021. "CatBoost model and artificial intelligence techniques for corporate failure prediction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Weiguang Han & Boyi Zhang & Qianqian Xie & Min Peng & Yanzhao Lai & Jimin Huang, 2023. "Select and Trade: Towards Unified Pair Trading with Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2301.10724, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    12. Baoqiang Zhan & Shu Zhang & Helen S. Du & Xiaoguang Yang, 2022. "Exploring Statistical Arbitrage Opportunities Using Machine Learning Strategy," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 861-882, October.
    13. Kamaladdin Fataliyev & Aneesh Chivukula & Mukesh Prasad & Wei Liu, 2021. "Stock Market Analysis with Text Data: A Review," Papers 2106.12985, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    14. Kentaro Imajo & Kentaro Minami & Katsuya Ito & Kei Nakagawa, 2020. "Deep Portfolio Optimization via Distributional Prediction of Residual Factors," Papers 2012.07245, arXiv.org.
    15. Fischer, Thomas G., 2018. "Reinforcement learning in financial markets - a survey," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 12/2018, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    16. Duffie, Darrell & Dworczak, Piotr, 2021. "Robust benchmark design," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 775-802.
    17. Knoll, Julian & Stübinger, Johannes & Grottke, Michael, 2017. "Exploiting social media with higher-order Factorization Machines: Statistical arbitrage on high-frequency data of the S&P 500," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 13/2017, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    18. Moews, Ben & Ibikunle, Gbenga, 2020. "Predictive intraday correlations in stable and volatile market environments: Evidence from deep learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    19. Guillaume Coqueret & Tony Guida, 2020. "Training trees on tails with applications to portfolio choice," Post-Print hal-04144665, HAL.
    20. Zhou, Hao & Kalev, Petko S., 2019. "Algorithmic and high frequency trading in Asia-Pacific, now and the future," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 186-207.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:176:y:2022:i:c:s004016252100901x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.