IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v42y1999i1p47-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trimmed, Bayesian and admissible estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Jurecková, Jana
  • Klebanov, Lev B.

Abstract

The authors proved in [5] that the robust M- and L-estimators of location, which are independent of the extreme order statistics of the sample, cannot be admissible with respect to L1 risk in the class of translation equivariant estimators. This result is now extended in two respects: (i) We show that these estimators cannot be even Bayesian, under some regularity conditions, with respect to a strictly convex and continuously differentiable loss function; (ii) moreover, we extend the result to the linear regression model and show the inadmissibility of regression equivariant estimators, trimming-off the observations with nonpositive [nonnegative] residuals with respect to [alpha]1- [[alpha]2]-regression quantiles, respectively, for some 0

Suggested Citation

  • Jurecková, Jana & Klebanov, Lev B., 1999. "Trimmed, Bayesian and admissible estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 47-51, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:42:y:1999:i:1:p:47-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(98)00187-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger W. Koenker & Vasco D'Orey, 1987. "Computing Regression Quantiles," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 36(3), pages 383-393, November.
    2. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guili Liao & Qimeng Liu & Rongmao Zhang & Shifang Zhang, 2022. "Rank test of unit‐root hypothesis with AR‐GARCH errors," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 695-719, September.
    2. Andrew Chesher, 2003. "Nonparametric identification with discrete endogenous variables," CeMMAP working papers 06/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Nader Naifar & Shawkat Hammoudeh & Aviral Kumar Tiwari, 2019. "Do Energy and Banking CDS Sector Spreads Reflect Financial Risks and Economic Policy Uncertainty? A Time-Scale Decomposition Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 507-534, August.
    4. Koenker, Roger & Park, Beum J., 1996. "An interior point algorithm for nonlinear quantile regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-2), pages 265-283.
    5. Qadan, Mahmoud & Jacob, Maram, 2022. "The value premium and investors' appetite for risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 194-219.
    6. Al-Nasseri, Alya & Menla Ali, Faek & Tucker, Allan, 2021. "Investor sentiment and the dispersion of stock returns: Evidence based on the social network of investors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Andrew Chesher, 2005. "Nonparametric Identification under Discrete Variation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(5), pages 1525-1550, September.
    8. Jawadi, Fredj & Sousa, Ricardo M., 2013. "Money demand in the euro area, the US and the UK: Assessing the role of nonlinearity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 507-515.
    9. Mensi, Walid & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Reboredo, Juan Carlos & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2014. "Do global factors impact BRICS stock markets? A quantile regression approach," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-17.
    10. Heiler, Siegfried, 1999. "A Survey on Nonparametric Time Series Analysis," CoFE Discussion Papers 99/05, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    11. Pitselis, Georgios, 2020. "Multi-stage nested classification credibility quantile regression model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 162-176.
    12. Georges Bresson & Guy Lacroix & Mohammad Arshad Rahman, 2021. "Bayesian panel quantile regression for binary outcomes with correlated random effects: an application on crime recidivism in Canada," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 227-259, January.
    13. Daniel Miles, 2002. "Small sample behaviour of quantile estimators," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(14), pages 911-913.
    14. Naifar, Nader & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2016. "Do global financial distress and uncertainties impact GCC and global sukuk return dynamics?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 57-69.
    15. Rodríguez García, Martha del Pilar & Cortez Alejandro, Klender Aimer & Méndez Sáenz, Alma Berenice & Garza Sánchez, Héctor Horacio, 2017. "Does an IFRS adoption increase value relevance and earnings timeliness in Latin America?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 155-168.
    16. Bantli, Faouzi El & Hallin, Marc, 1999. "L1-estimation in linear models with heterogeneous white noise," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 305-315, December.
    17. Zhu, Min, 2013. "Return distribution predictability and its implications for portfolio selection," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 209-223.
    18. He, Xuming & Pan, Xiaoou & Tan, Kean Ming & Zhou, Wen-Xin, 2023. "Smoothed quantile regression with large-scale inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 367-388.
    19. I-Chun Tsai, 2015. "Monetary policy and bubbles in the national and regional UK housing markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1471-1488, June.
    20. Chevapatrakul, Thanaset, 2015. "Monetary environments and stock returns: International evidence based on the quantile regression technique," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 83-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:42:y:1999:i:1:p:47-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.