IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v181y2022ics0167715221002273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Riemann–Liouville field and its GMC as H→0, and skew flattening for the rough Bergomi model

Author

Listed:
  • Forde, Martin
  • Fukasawa, Masaaki
  • Gerhold, Stefan
  • Smith, Benjamin

Abstract

We consider a re-scaled Riemann–Liouville (RL) process ZtH=∫0t(t−s)H−12dWs, and using Lévy’s continuity theorem for random fields we show that ZH tends weakly to an almost log-correlated Gaussian field Z as H→0. Away from zero, this field differs from a standard Bacry–Muzy field by an a.s.Hölder continuous Gaussian process, and we show that ξγH(dt)=eγZtH−12γ2V ar(ZtH)dt tends to a Gaussian multiplicative chaos (GMC) random measure ξγ for γ∈(0,1) as H→0. We also show convergence in law for ξγH as H→0 for γ∈[0,2) using tightness arguments, and ξγ is non-atomic and locally multifractal away from zero. In the final section, we discuss applications to the Rough Bergomi model; specifically, using Jacod’s stable convergence theorem, we prove the surprising result that (with an appropriate re-scaling) the martingale component Xt of the log stock price tends weakly to Bξγ([0,t]) as H→0, where B is a Brownian motion independent of everything else. This implies that the implied volatility smile for the full rough Bergomi model with ρ≤0 is symmetric in the H→0 limit, and without re-scaling the model tends weakly to the Black–Scholes model as H→0. We also derive a closed-form expression for the conditional third moment E((Xt+h−Xt)3|Ft) (for H>0) given a finite history, and E(XT3) tends to zero (or blows up) exponentially fast as H→0 depending on whether γ is less than or greater than a critical γ≈1.61711 which is the root of 14+12logγ−316γ2. We also briefly discuss the pros and cons of a H=0 model with non-zero skew for which Xt/t tends weakly to a non-Gaussian random variable X1 with non-zero skewness as t→0.

Suggested Citation

  • Forde, Martin & Fukasawa, Masaaki & Gerhold, Stefan & Smith, Benjamin, 2022. "The Riemann–Liouville field and its GMC as H→0, and skew flattening for the rough Bergomi model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:181:y:2022:i:c:s0167715221002273
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2021.109265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715221002273
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2021.109265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eyal Neuman & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2017. "Fractional Brownian motion with zero Hurst parameter: a rough volatility viewpoint," Papers 1711.00427, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    2. J. F. Muzy & R. Baile & E. Bacry, 2013. "Random cascade model in the limit of infinite integral scale as the exponential of a non-stationary $1/f$ noise. Application to volatility fluctuations in stock markets," Papers 1301.4160, arXiv.org.
    3. Forde, Martin & Smith, Benjamin, 2020. "The conditional law of the Bacry–Muzy and Riemann–Liouville log correlated Gaussian fields and their GMC, via Gaussian Hilbert and fractional Sobolev spaces," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Masaaki Fukasawa & Tetsuya Takabatake & Rebecca Westphal, 2019. "Is Volatility Rough ?," Papers 1905.04852, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    5. Eric Renault & Nizar Touzi, 1996. "Option Hedging And Implied Volatilities In A Stochastic Volatility Model1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 279-302, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brandi, Giuseppe & Di Matteo, T., 2022. "Multiscaling and rough volatility: An empirical investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Peng & Muzy, Jean-François & Bacry, Emmanuel, 2022. "From rough to multifractal volatility: The log S-fBM model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    2. Paul Hager & Eyal Neuman, 2020. "The Multiplicative Chaos of $H=0$ Fractional Brownian Fields," Papers 2008.01385, arXiv.org.
    3. Christian Bayer & Fabian Andsem Harang & Paolo Pigato, 2020. "Log-modulated rough stochastic volatility models," Papers 2008.03204, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    4. Elisa Alòs & Maria Elvira Mancino & Tai-Ho Wang, 2019. "Volatility and volatility-linked derivatives: estimation, modeling, and pricing," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(2), pages 321-349, December.
    5. René Garcia & Richard Luger & Eric Renault, 2000. "Asymmetric Smiles, Leverage Effects and Structural Parameters," Working Papers 2000-57, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    6. Francesco Caravenna & Jacopo Corbetta, 2015. "The asymptotic smile of a multiscaling stochastic volatility model," Papers 1501.03387, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
    7. Henri Bertholon & Alain Monfort & Fulvio Pegoraro, 2006. "Pricing and Inference with Mixtures of Conditionally Normal Processes," Working Papers 2006-28, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    8. Tsekrekos, Andrianos E. & Yannacopoulos, Athanasios N., 2016. "Optimal switching decisions under stochastic volatility with fast mean reversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 148-157.
    9. Caravenna, Francesco & Corbetta, Jacopo, 2018. "The asymptotic smile of a multiscaling stochastic volatility model," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 1034-1071.
    10. Matthias R. Fengler & Helmut Herwartz & Christian Werner, 2012. "A Dynamic Copula Approach to Recovering the Index Implied Volatility Skew," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 457-493, June.
    11. Frazier, David T. & Renault, Eric, 2017. "Efficient two-step estimation via targeting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 212-227.
    12. Luciano Campi & Ismail Laachir & Claude Martini, 2014. "Change of numeraire in the two-marginals martingale transport problem," Papers 1406.6951, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    13. G Sandmann & Siem Jan Koopman, 1996. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Stochastic Volatility Models," FMG Discussion Papers dp248, Financial Markets Group.
    14. Peter K. Friz & Paul Gassiat & Paolo Pigato, 2022. "Short-dated smile under rough volatility: asymptotics and numerics," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 463-480, March.
    15. René Garcia & Richard Luger & Éric Renault, 2005. "Viewpoint: Option prices, preferences, and state variables," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Fabio Antonelli & Sergio Scarlatti, 2009. "Pricing options under stochastic volatility: a power series approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 269-303, April.
    17. Blanka Horvath & Antoine Jacquier & Aitor Muguruza & Andreas Sojmark, 2017. "Functional central limit theorems for rough volatility," Papers 1711.03078, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    18. Capelle-Blancard, G. & Jurczenko, E., 1999. "Une application de la formule de Jarrow et Rudd aux options sur indice CAC 40," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 2000.05, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    19. Stefano De Marco & Caroline Hillairet & Antoine Jacquier, 2013. "Shapes of implied volatility with positive mass at zero," Papers 1310.1020, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    20. Purba Banerjee & Srikanth Iyer & Shashi Jain, 2023. "Multi-period static hedging of European options," Papers 2310.01104, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:181:y:2022:i:c:s0167715221002273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.