IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v130y2020i10p6157-6183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance sampling correction versus standard averages of reversible MCMCs in terms of the asymptotic variance

Author

Listed:
  • Franks, Jordan
  • Vihola, Matti

Abstract

We establish an ordering criterion for the asymptotic variances of two consistent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimators: an importance sampling (IS) estimator, based on an approximate reversible chain and subsequent IS weighting, and a standard MCMC estimator, based on an exact reversible chain. Essentially, we relax the criterion of the Peskun type covariance ordering by considering two different invariant probabilities, and obtain, in place of a strict ordering of asymptotic variances, a bound of the asymptotic variance of IS by that of the direct MCMC. Simple examples show that IS can have arbitrarily better or worse asymptotic variance than Metropolis–Hastings and delayed-acceptance (DA) MCMC. Our ordering implies that IS is guaranteed to be competitive up to a factor depending on the supremum of the (marginal) IS weight. We elaborate upon the criterion in case of unbiased estimators as part of an auxiliary variable framework. We show how the criterion implies asymptotic variance guarantees for IS in terms of pseudo-marginal (PM) and DA corrections, essentially if the ratio of exact and approximate likelihoods is bounded. We also show that convergence of the IS chain can be less affected by unbounded high-variance unbiased estimators than PM and DA chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Franks, Jordan & Vihola, Matti, 2020. "Importance sampling correction versus standard averages of reversible MCMCs in terms of the asymptotic variance," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(10), pages 6157-6183.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:130:y:2020:i:10:p:6157-6183
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2020.05.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414919304053
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2020.05.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarner, Søren Fiig & Hansen, Ernst, 2000. "Geometric ergodicity of Metropolis algorithms," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 341-361, February.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3578 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. A. Doucet & M. K. Pitt & G. Deligiannidis & R. Kohn, 2015. "Efficient implementation of Markov chain Monte Carlo when using an unbiased likelihood estimator," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(2), pages 295-313.
    4. Panos Parpas & Berk Ustun & Mort Webster & Quang Kha Tran, 2015. "Importance Sampling in Stochastic Programming: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 358-377, May.
    5. Christophe Andrieu & Arnaud Doucet & Roman Holenstein, 2010. "Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 269-342, June.
    6. Peter W. Glynn & Donald L. Iglehart, 1989. "Importance Sampling for Stochastic Simulations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(11), pages 1367-1392, November.
    7. Chris Sherlock & Alexandre H. Thiery & Anthony Lee, 2017. "Pseudo-marginal Metropolis–Hastings sampling using averages of unbiased estimators," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(3), pages 727-734.
    8. C. Andrieu, 2016. "On random- and systematic-scan samplers," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(3), pages 719-726.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chris Sherlock & Anthony Lee, 2022. "Variance Bounding of Delayed-Acceptance Kernels," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2237-2260, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matti Vihola & Jouni Helske & Jordan Franks, 2020. "Importance sampling type estimators based on approximate marginal Markov chain Monte Carlo," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1339-1376, December.
    2. Lux, Thomas, 2020. "Bayesian estimation of agent-based models via adaptive particle Markov chain Monte Carlo," Economics Working Papers 2020-01, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    3. Matias Quiroz & Robert Kohn & Mattias Villani & Minh-Ngoc Tran, 2019. "Speeding Up MCMC by Efficient Data Subsampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 831-843, April.
    4. James M. Nason & Gregor W. Smith, 2021. "Measuring the slowly evolving trend in US inflation with professional forecasts," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Fulop, Andras & Heng, Jeremy & Li, Junye & Liu, Hening, 2022. "Bayesian estimation of long-run risk models using sequential Monte Carlo," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 62-84.
    6. Chris Sherlock, 2016. "Optimal Scaling for the Pseudo-Marginal Random Walk Metropolis: Insensitivity to the Noise Generating Mechanism," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 869-884, September.
    7. Andras Fulop & Jeremy Heng & Junye Li, 2022. "Efficient Likelihood-based Estimation via Annealing for Dynamic Structural Macrofinance Models," Papers 2201.01094, arXiv.org.
    8. Golightly, Andrew & Bradley, Emma & Lowe, Tom & Gillespie, Colin S., 2019. "Correlated pseudo-marginal schemes for time-discretised stochastic kinetic models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 92-107.
    9. Thomas Lux, 2022. "Bayesian Estimation of Agent-Based Models via Adaptive Particle Markov Chain Monte Carlo," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 451-477, August.
    10. Wiqvist, Samuel & Golightly, Andrew & McLean, Ashleigh T. & Picchini, Umberto, 2021. "Efficient inference for stochastic differential equation mixed-effects models using correlated particle pseudo-marginal algorithms," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Fulop, Andras & Li, Junye, 2019. "Bayesian estimation of dynamic asset pricing models with informative observations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 114-138.
    12. Rub'en Loaiza-Maya & Didier Nibbering, 2022. "Efficient variational approximations for state space models," Papers 2210.11010, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    13. Hubin, Aliaksandr & Storvik, Geir, 2018. "Mode jumping MCMC for Bayesian variable selection in GLMM," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 281-297.
    14. Johan Dahlin & Thomas B. Schon, 2015. "Getting Started with Particle Metropolis-Hastings for Inference in Nonlinear Dynamical Models," Papers 1511.01707, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    15. Farmer, J. Doyne & Dyer, Joel & Cannon, Patrick & Schmon, Sebastian, 2022. "Black-box Bayesian inference for economic agent-based models," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-05, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    16. Sergei Seleznev, 2016. "Solving DSGE models with stochastic trends," Bank of Russia Working Paper Series wps15, Bank of Russia.
    17. Chris Sherlock, 2021. "Direct statistical inference for finite Markov jump processes via the matrix exponential," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2863-2887, December.
    18. Ajay Jasra & Kody Law & Carina Suciu, 2020. "Advanced Multilevel Monte Carlo Methods," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 548-579, December.
    19. Sanha Noh, 2020. "Posterior Inference on Parameters in a Nonlinear DSGE Model via Gaussian-Based Filters," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 795-841, December.
    20. Bournakis, Ioannis & Tsionas, Mike G., 2023. "A Non-Parametric Estimation of Productivity with Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Shocks: The Role of Research and Development (R&D) and Corporate Tax," MPRA Paper 118100, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:130:y:2020:i:10:p:6157-6183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.