IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v73y2011i6p904-911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing hope, denial or temporal anomie? Informal cancer carers' accounts of spouses' cancer diagnoses

Author

Listed:
  • Olson, Rebecca Eileen

Abstract

Carers of cancer patients' emotional responses to cancer diagnoses have been a central focus within psycho-oncology. Some of this literature asserts that the maladaptive coping strategy denial is prevalent amongst carers. Using semi-structured, longitudinal interviews with 32 Australian Capital Territory carers of a spouse with cancer and an interactionist sociology of emotions framework to understanding their emotions, this study aimed to both contribute to the literature on cancer carers' coping strategies and provide a richer sociological depiction of carers' emotional reactions to a cancer diagnosis. The results raise questions about the value of singularly examining denial in cancer carers. Instead, these data suggest that carers use a range of coping strategies in the short-term and do emotion work to adapt to a challenged temporal orientation. The term temporal anomie is offered to describe carers' disrupted orientations in time and facilitate further discussion on the link between time and emotion work. Findings also show the importance of medical professionals' casting of the prognosis, from imminent death to certain future, to this temporal re-orientation and emotion work process. Instead of 'managing hope,' as much of the cancer communication literature describes it, findings suggest that physicians address cancer carers' and patients' temporal anomie. Future research might benefit from moving beyond individualistic conceptualisations of carers' emotions to include the cultural, temporal and interactionist influences.

Suggested Citation

  • Olson, Rebecca Eileen, 2011. "Managing hope, denial or temporal anomie? Informal cancer carers' accounts of spouses' cancer diagnoses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 904-911, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:73:y:2011:i:6:p:904-911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611000426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toseland, Ronald W. & Blanchard, Christina G. & McCallion, Philip, 1995. "A problem solving intervention for caregivers of cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 517-528, February.
    2. Kellehear, Allan, 1984. "Are we a 'death-denying' society? A sociological review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 713-721, January.
    3. Norberg, Annika Lindahl & Lindblad, Frank & Boman, Krister K., 2005. "Coping strategies in parents of children with cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 965-975, March.
    4. Emslie, Carol & Browne, Susan & MacLeod, Una & Rozmovits, Linda & Mitchell, Elizabeth & Ziebland, Sue, 2009. "'Getting through' not 'going under': A qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1169-1175, March.
    5. Wilkinson, Sue & Kitzinger, Celia, 2000. "Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients' talk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 797-811, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schrank, Beate & Bird, Victoria & Rudnick, Abraham & Slade, Mike, 2012. "Determinants, self-management strategies and interventions for hope in people with mental disorders: Systematic search and narrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(4), pages 554-564.
    2. Olson, Rebecca E. & Smith, Alexandra & Good, Phillip & Neate, Emily & Hughes, Cody & Hardy, Janet, 2021. "Emotionally reflexive labour in end-of-life communication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Flore, Jacinthe & Kokanović, Renata & Broom, Alex & Heynemann, Sarah & Lai-Kwon, Julia & Jefford, Michael, 2023. "Entanglements and imagined futures: The subject(s) of precision in oncology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    4. Hughes, Nic & Locock, Louise & Ziebland, Sue, 2013. "Personal identity and the role of ‘carer’ among relatives and friends of people with multiple sclerosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 78-85.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ya-Mei Chen, 2014. "Differences in Outcomes of Caregiver Support Services for Male and Female Caregivers," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, August.
    2. Wang, Saerom & Kirillova, Ksenia & Lehto, Xinran, 2017. "Reconciling unsatisfying tourism experiences: Message type effectiveness and the role of counterfactual thinking," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 233-243.
    3. Sanders, Caroline & Rogers, Anne & Gately, Claire & Kennedy, Anne, 2008. "Planning for end of life care within lay-led chronic illness self-management training: The significance of 'death awareness' and biographical context in participant accounts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 982-993, February.
    4. Dumas, Jean-Malik, 2016. "Essays in behavioral strategy," Other publications TiSEM a04c1b1b-eeed-48ad-894b-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Moore, Helen & Gillespie, Alex, 2014. "The caregiving bind: Concealing the demands of informal care can undermine the caregiving identity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 102-109.
    6. Borgstrom, Erica & Walter, Tony, 2015. "Choice and compassion at the end of life: A critical analysis of recent English policy discourse," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 99-105.
    7. Mona I. A. Almuhtaseb & Francesca Alby & Cristina Zucchermaglio & Marilena Fatigante, 2020. "Religiosity as a Cultural Resource for Arab-Palestinian Women’s Coping with Cancer," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    8. Zimmermann, Camilla, 2012. "Acceptance of dying: A discourse analysis of palliative care literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 217-224.
    9. Broom, Alex & Cavenagh, John, 2010. "Masculinity, moralities and being cared for: An exploration of experiences of living and dying in a hospice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 869-876, September.
    10. Macdonald, Sara & Conway, Elaine & Bikker, Annemieke & Browne, Susan & Robb, Kathryn & Campbell, Christine & Steele, Robert JC. & Weller, David & Macleod, Una, 2019. "Making sense of bodily sensations: Do shared cancer narratives influence symptom appraisal?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 31-39.
    11. Donna Goodridge, 2013. "Planning for Serious Illness amongst Community-Dwelling Older Adults," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-7, April.
    12. Drew, Patricia, 2011. "“But Then I Learned…”: Weight loss surgery patients negotiate surgery discourses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1230-1237.
    13. Chen, Ya-Mei & Hedrick, Susan C. & Young, Heather M., 2010. "A pilot evaluation of the Family Caregiver Support Program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 113-119, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:73:y:2011:i:6:p:904-911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.