IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v69y2009i8p1228-1235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Someone's rooting for you": Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Finlay, Susanna
  • Sandall, Jane

Abstract

Continuity and advocacy are widely held to be important elements in maternal healthcare, yet they are often lacking from the care women receive. In order to understand this disparity, we draw upon interviews and ethnographic observational findings from The One-to-One Caseload Project, a study exploring the impacts of a caseload model of maternity care within an urban National Health Service provider in Britain. Drawing on Lipsky's (1980) and Prottas's (1979) theories of street-level bureaucracy, this paper attempts to understand how midwives, working on the frontline within caseload and standard care models, manage the competing demands of delivering a personalised service within a bureaucratic organisation. The caseload care model serves as a case study for how a client-centred model of working can assist street-level bureaucrats to manage the administrative pressures of public service organisations and provide their clients with a personalised, responsive service. Nevertheless, despite such benefits, client-centred models of working may have unintended consequences for both health carers and healthcare systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Finlay, Susanna & Sandall, Jane, 2009. ""Someone's rooting for you": Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1228-1235, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:8:p:1228-1235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00489-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walsh, Denis, 2006. "Subverting the assembly-line: Childbirth in a free-standing birth centre," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1330-1340, March.
    2. Walker, Liz & Gilson, Lucy, 2004. "'We are bitter but we are satisfied': nurses as street-level bureaucrats in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 1251-1261, September.
    3. Goold, Susan Dorr & Klipp, Glenn, 2002. "Managed care members talk about trust," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 879-888, March.
    4. Foley, Ronan & Platzer, Hazel, 2007. "Place and provision: Mapping mental health advocacy services in London," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 617-632, February.
    5. Armstrong, David, 1985. "Space and time in British general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(7), pages 659-666, January.
    6. McCourt, Christine, 2006. "Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1307-1318, March.
    7. Bramesfeld, Anke & Klippel, Ulrike & Seidel, Gabriele & Schwartz, Friedrich W. & Dierks, Marie-Luise, 2007. "How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 880-889, September.
    8. McLean, Athena, 1995. "Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the United States: Contradictions, crisis and change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 1053-1071, April.
    9. Woodward, Christel A. & Abelson, Julia & Tedford, Sara & Hutchison, Brian, 2004. "What is important to continuity in home care?: Perspectives of key stakeholders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 177-192, January.
    10. Mechanic, David & Meyer, Sharon, 2000. "Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 657-668, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changkun Cai & Qiyao Shen & Na Tang, 2022. "Do visiting monks give better sermons? “Street‐level bureaucrats from higher‐up” in targeted poverty alleviation in China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 55-71, February.
    2. Vestering, Asra & de Kok, Bregje C. & Browne, Joyce L. & Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame, 2021. "Navigating with logics: Care for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in Ghana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilson, Lucy & Palmer, Natasha & Schneider, Helen, 2005. "Trust and health worker performance: exploring a conceptual framework using South African evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1418-1429, October.
    2. Röttger, Julia & Blümel, Miriam & Fuchs, Sabine & Busse, Reinhard, 2014. "Assessing the responsiveness of chronic disease care - Is the World Health Organization's concept of health system responsiveness applicable?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 87-94.
    3. Li, Mingqiang & Li, Zhihui & Yip, Chi-Man (Winnie), 2022. "Informal payments and patients’ perceptions of the physician agency problem: Evidence from rural China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    4. Madeleine Aannestad & Marit Herstad & Elisabeth Severinsson, 2020. "A meta‐ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research on women's experience of midwifery care," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 171-183, June.
    5. Melberg, Andrea & Diallo, Abdoulaye Hama & Storeng, Katerini T. & Tylleskär, Thorkild & Moland, Karen Marie, 2018. "Policy, paperwork and ‘postographs’: Global indicators and maternity care documentation in rural Burkina Faso," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 28-35.
    6. Valéry Ridde & Seni Kouanda & Aristide Bado & Nicole Bado & Slim Haddad, 2012. "Reducing the Medical Cost of Deliveries in Burkina Faso Is Good for Everyone, Including the Poor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, March.
    7. Ross, Heather M. & Pine, Kathleen H. & Curran, Sarah & Augusta, Dawn, 2022. "Pathway mapping as a tool to address police use of force in behavioral health crisis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    8. Sara Zabeen & Sharon Lawn & Anthony Venning & Kate Fairweather, 2021. "Why Do People with Severe Mental Illness Have Poor Cardiovascular Health?—The Need for Implementing a Recovery-Based Self-Management Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Smirnova, Michelle & Owens, Jennifer Gatewood, 2017. "Medicalized addiction, self-medication, or nonmedical prescription drug use? How trust figures into incarcerated women's conceptualization of illicit prescription drug use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 106-115.
    10. Nong, Paige & Raj, Minakshi & Trinidad, Marie Grace & Rowe, Zachary & Platt, Jodyn, 2021. "Understanding racial differences in attitudes about public health efforts during COVID-19 using an explanatory mixed methods design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    11. Stasiulis, Elaine & Gibson, Barbara E. & Webster, Fiona & Boydell, Katherine M., 2020. "Resisting governance and the production of trust in early psychosis intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    12. Attila A. Kovacs & Bruce L. Golden & Richard F. Hartl & Sophie N. Parragh, 2015. "The Generalized Consistent Vehicle Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 796-816, November.
    13. Gabriela Lotta & Roberto Pires & Michael Hill & Marie Ostergaard Møller, 2022. "Recontextualizing street‐level bureaucracy in the developing world," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 3-10, February.
    14. Tritter, Jonathan Quetzal & McCallum, Alison, 2006. "The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 156-168, April.
    15. Arakelyan, Stella & Jailobaeva, Kanykey & Dakessian, Arek & Diaconu, Karin & Caperon, Lizzie & Strang, Alison & Bou-Orm, Ibrahim R. & Witter, Sophie & Ager, Alastair, 2021. "The role of trust in health-seeking for non-communicable disease services in fragile contexts: A cross-country comparative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    16. Koyuncu, Işıl & Yavuz, Mesut, 2019. "Duplicating nodes or arcs in green vehicle routing: A computational comparison of two formulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 605-623.
    17. Zeytinoglu, Isik U. & Denton, Margaret & Brookman, Catherine & Plenderleith, Jennifer, 2014. "Task shifting policy in Ontario, Canada: Does it help personal support workers’ intention to stay?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 179-186.
    18. Adams, Wallis E., 2020. "Unintended consequences of institutionalizing peer support work in mental healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    19. Ngwira, Chikosa & Mayhew, Susannah H. & Hutchinson, Eleanor, 2021. "Community-level integration of health services and community health workers’ agency in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    20. David, Guy & Kim, Kunhee Lucy, 2018. "The effect of workforce assignment on performance: Evidence from home health care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 26-45.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:8:p:1228-1235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.