IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v68y2009i7p1229-1237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: An analysis of interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Pappas, Yannis
  • Seale, Clive

Abstract

This paper describes communication in the opening phases of real-time, video-mediated telemedicine consultations, using the method of conversation analysis, in three NHS settings in the UK. The literature on interaction analysis in face-to-face medical consultations indicates that physicians' capacity to determine topics in consultations is established in the opening phases of the encounter. This is because patients concede the communicative floor to physicians who claim it for themselves by using well-established patterns of interaction. Drawing on 10 teleconsultations, the analysis shows that, for health care professionals and patients, video-mediated telemedicine is unfamiliar terrain, where communication requires constant negotiation of skills and roles, this complexity being added to by the fact that more than one professional participates in the encounter. Analysis of the opening phases of teleconsultations shows them to involve 'floor negotiation' between professionals and between professionals and patients in which they experience discrepancies between suggested 'frames', a term coined by Goffman [Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.] to indicate interpretive schemas that allow people to understand the meaning of events in interactions in which they participate. Frame attunement is achieved during floor negotiation through various interruptions, interjections and attachments that professionals produce to defend their agenda. The novelty of the setting also made participants negotiate the physical space in which the encounter took place. We make tentative suggestions for the training of participants, based on the limited evidence of this study, which requires extending by further studies based on direct observation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pappas, Yannis & Seale, Clive, 2009. "The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: An analysis of interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1229-1237, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:7:p:1229-1237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00012-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreassen, Hege K. & Dyb, Kari & May, Carl R. & Pope, Catherine J. & Warth, Line L., 2018. "Digitized patient–provider interaction: How does it matter? A qualitative meta-synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 36-44.
    2. Sebastian Sołomacha & Paweł Sowa & Łukasz Kiszkiel & Piotr Paweł Laskowski & Maciej Alimowski & Łukasz Szczerbiński & Andrzej Szpak & Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska & Karol Kamiński, 2022. "Patient’s Perspective of Telemedicine in Poland—A Two-Year Pandemic Picture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Pappas Yannis & Vseteckova Jitka, 2019. "Research, Evaluation and Sustainability: Reflecting on 15 Years of Experience in Ehealth," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 19(2), pages 14212-14214, July.
    4. Murdoch, Jamie & Barnes, Rebecca & Pooler, Jillian & Lattimer, Valerie & Fletcher, Emily & Campbell, John L., 2015. "The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 36-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:7:p:1229-1237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.