IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v62y2006i8p2079-2090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health care practices, professions and perspectives: A case study in intensive care

Author

Listed:
  • Carmel, Simon

Abstract

This paper makes the case for bringing empirical analysis to the heart of conceptual work about health care practice. Drawing on ethnographic observations in intensive care units in the UK, it identifies and analyses a mismatch between the practice of a particular health care specialty and its associated professional and academic discourse. As a result, two claims in academic nursing discourse are criticised: first, that nursing practice is (or should be) focused on individual patient care; and second, that nursing is (or should be) radically distinct from medicine. By raising the analytical profile of situated practice, health care workers (in particular, but not exclusively, nurses) are shown to undertake important caring work with patients' relatives. Their work includes caring not only for an individual patient's social self, but also for patients' social contexts. The paper also argues that theoretical emphases on nursing's unique perspective and on differences between medicine and nursing are exaggerated in clinical practice, for example there are many similarities between what nurses and doctors actually do. Reasons for the persistence of these claims in academic nursing discourse are put forward--nursing seems to be quite unusual in needing an explicit theory of practice, and the paper speculates on why this is the case. The general lesson of the paper is that analytical evidence about the context and content of practice needs to be afforded a more fundamental role in the development of theories about practice-based disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmel, Simon, 2006. "Health care practices, professions and perspectives: A case study in intensive care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 2079-2090, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:8:p:2079-2090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00481-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melia, Kath M., 2001. "Ethical issues and the importance of consensus for the intensive care team," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 707-719, September.
    2. Gabe, Jonathan & Olumide, Gillian & Bury, Michael, 2004. "'It takes three to tango':: a framework for understanding patient partnership in paediatric clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 1071-1079, September.
    3. Seymour, Jane Elizabeth, 2000. "Negotiating natural death in intensive care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 1241-1252, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannessen, Lars E.F., 2018. "Workplace assimilation and professional jurisdiction: How nurses learn to blur the nursing-medical boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 51-58.
    2. Mackintosh, Nicola & Sandall, Jane, 2010. "Overcoming gendered and professional hierarchies in order to facilitate escalation of care in emergency situations: The role of standardised communication protocols," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(9), pages 1683-1686, November.
    3. Hamilton, Bridget Elizabeth & Manias, Elizabeth, 2007. "Rethinking nurses' observations: Psychiatric nursing skills and invisibility in an acute inpatient setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 331-343, July.
    4. Caronia, Letizia & Saglietti, Marzia & Chieregato, Arturo, 2020. "Challenging the interprofessional epistemic boundaries: The practices of informing in nurse-physician interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iedema, Rick & Sorensen, Roslyn & Braithwaite, Jeffrey & Flabouris, Arthas & Turnbull, Liz, 2005. "The teleo-affective limits of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 845-857, February.
    2. Lang, Alexander & Frankus, Elisabeth & Heimerl, Katharina, 2022. "The perspective of professional caregivers working in generalist palliative care on ‘good dying’: An integrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Margaret O'Connor, 2006. "Commentary on Trovo de Araujo M and Paes da Silva MJ (2004) Communication with dying patients: perception of intensive care units nurses in Brazil. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 143–149," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 114-116, January.
    4. Marie-Astrid Le Theule & Caroline Lambert & Jérémy Morales, 2020. "Governing Death: Organizing End-of-life Situations," Post-Print hal-03534172, HAL.
    5. Marie-Astrid Le Theule & Caroline Lambert & Jérémy Morales, 2017. "Accompanying death, organising the end of life [Accompagner la mort, organiser la fin de vie]," Post-Print hal-03654015, HAL.
    6. Jennifer Rainer & Joanne Kraenzle Schneider & Rebecca A. Lorenz, 2018. "Ethical dilemmas in nursing: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3446-3461, October.
    7. Kath MacDonald & Lindesay Irvine & Margaret Coulter Smith, 2015. "An exploration of partnership through interactions between young ‘expert’ patients with cystic fibrosis and healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3528-3537, December.
    8. Stacey, Clare Louise & Henderson, Stuart & MacArthur, Kelly R. & Dohan, Daniel, 2009. "Demanding patient or demanding encounter?: A case study of a cancer clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 729-737, September.
    9. Le Theule, Marie-Astrid & Lambert, Caroline & Morales, Jérémy, 2023. "Accounting to the end of life. Scarcity, performance and death," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Laura Boland & France Légaré & Daniel I. McIsaac & Ian D. Graham & Monica Taljaard & Simon Dècary & Dawn Stacey, 2019. "SURE Test Accuracy for Decisional Conflict Screening among Parents Making Decisions for Their Child," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(8), pages 1010-1018, November.
    11. Ellen A. Lipstein & William B. Brinkman & Maria T. Britto, 2012. "What Is Known about Parents’ Treatment Decisions? A Narrative Review of Pediatric Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(2), pages 246-258, March.
    12. Krawczyk, Marian, 2021. "Organizing end of life in hospital palliative care: A Canadian example," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    13. Brummell, Stephen P. & Seymour, Jane & Higginbottom, Gina, 2016. "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions in the emergency department: An ethnography of tacit knowledge in practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 47-54.
    14. Nelson, Pauline Anne & Caress, Ann-Louise & Glenny, Anne-Marie & Kirk, Susan A., 2012. "‘Doing the "Right" Thing’: How parents experience and manage decision-making for children’s ‘Normalising’ surgeries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(5), pages 796-804.
    15. Natalie Pattison & Jude Mclellan & Lara Roskelly & Kirsty McLeod & Theresa Wiseman, 2018. "Managing clinical uncertainty: An ethnographic study of the impact of critical care outreach on end‐of‐life transitions in ward‐based critically ill patients with a life‐limiting illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3900-3912, November.
    16. Aita, Kaoruko & Kai, Ichiro, 2010. "Physicians' psychosocial barriers to different modes of withdrawal of life support in critical care: A qualitative study in Japan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 616-622, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:8:p:2079-2090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.