IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v59y2004i5p1071-1079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'It takes three to tango':: a framework for understanding patient partnership in paediatric clinics

Author

Listed:
  • Gabe, Jonathan
  • Olumide, Gillian
  • Bury, Michael

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, the term 'partnership' has increasingly been inserted into the literature and rhetoric of the UK health-care system. In this paper, the assumptions and implications surrounding the usage of the term in relation to doctor-patient interaction are examined in the context of paediatric services. The paper considers recent ideas about partnership in medical encounters, especially those of Charles et al., and the extent to which they are applicable to children. The paper then goes on to develop a framework for understanding patient-partnership issues. It is argued that any investigation of partnership will need to take account of the organisational and legal setting, as well as the beliefs and agendas that all parties bring to the medical encounter. In the context of paediatrics, the perspectives of three actors--the child, parent and health service professional--need to be explored. Our framework allows for different sorts of 'coalition' to develop between these actors as they try to reconcile their perspectives in the clinic and offers a situationally contextualised view of partnership. We also argue that these matters require study outside as well as inside the clinic, through the use of a range of methods, including those that help children at home review their involvement in decision making in the clinic.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabe, Jonathan & Olumide, Gillian & Bury, Michael, 2004. "'It takes three to tango':: a framework for understanding patient partnership in paediatric clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 1071-1079, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:5:p:1071-1079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00691-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nelson, Pauline Anne & Caress, Ann-Louise & Glenny, Anne-Marie & Kirk, Susan A., 2012. "‘Doing the "Right" Thing’: How parents experience and manage decision-making for children’s ‘Normalising’ surgeries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(5), pages 796-804.
    2. Carmel, Simon, 2006. "Health care practices, professions and perspectives: A case study in intensive care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 2079-2090, April.
    3. Laura Boland & France Légaré & Daniel I. McIsaac & Ian D. Graham & Monica Taljaard & Simon Dècary & Dawn Stacey, 2019. "SURE Test Accuracy for Decisional Conflict Screening among Parents Making Decisions for Their Child," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(8), pages 1010-1018, November.
    4. Ellen A. Lipstein & William B. Brinkman & Maria T. Britto, 2012. "What Is Known about Parents’ Treatment Decisions? A Narrative Review of Pediatric Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(2), pages 246-258, March.
    5. Kath MacDonald & Lindesay Irvine & Margaret Coulter Smith, 2015. "An exploration of partnership through interactions between young ‘expert’ patients with cystic fibrosis and healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3528-3537, December.
    6. Stacey, Clare Louise & Henderson, Stuart & MacArthur, Kelly R. & Dohan, Daniel, 2009. "Demanding patient or demanding encounter?: A case study of a cancer clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 729-737, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:5:p:1071-1079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.