IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i10p2307-2320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician-elderly patient-companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters

Author

Listed:
  • Ishikawa, Hirono
  • Roter, Debra L.
  • Yamazaki, Yoshihiko
  • Takayama, Tomoko

Abstract

Although the triadic encounter of physician, patient, and an accompanying family member is a common phenomenon in geriatrics, previous research on the communication in medical encounters has primarily focused on dyadic interactions between physician and patient. This study aimed to explore the triadic communication and communication roles of patient companions in Japanese geriatric encounters. Among elderly patients aged 65 or over who were under continuous care of nine attending physicians at a university affiliated geriatric clinic in Tokyo, 63 accompanied patients and 82 unaccompanied patients were included for this study. The consultation was audiotape recorded and analyzed using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) with additional categories developed to code aspects of companion communication. In dyadic encounters, the average proportions of physician's talk and patient's talk were 54% and 46%, respectively, while in triadic encounters the average talk proportions of physician, patient, and companion were 49%, 29%, and 22%. Companions made a significant contribution to the communication during the visit by providing information and asking the physician questions, as well as facilitating patient's talk. The companion's communication may influence not only the patient's but also the physician's communication. The patient's expectation of the companion's role during the visit and the companion's intention regarding their role were generally related to one another, and had positive associations with the companion's actual behavior during the visit. Nevertheless, companions often anticipated playing a more direct communication role during the visit, including the provision of information and asking of questions, than patients expected of them. Further investigation is needed to explore the communication dynamics in triads and dyads, and its relation to patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishikawa, Hirono & Roter, Debra L. & Yamazaki, Yoshihiko & Takayama, Tomoko, 2005. "Physician-elderly patient-companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 2307-2320, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:10:p:2307-2320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00493-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hattori, Hiroyuki & Salzberg, Stephan M. & Kiang, Winston P. & Fujimiya, Tatsuya & Tejima, Yutaka & Furuno, Junji, 1991. "The patient's right to information in Japan--Legal rules and doctor's opinions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1007-1016, January.
    2. Greene, Michele G. & Adelman, Ronald D. & Friedmann, Erika & Charon, Rita, 1994. "Older patient satisfaction with communication during an initial medical encounter," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 1279-1288, May.
    3. Ishikawa, Hirono & Takayama, Tomoko & Yamazaki, Yoshihiko & Seki, Yukiko & Katsumata, Noriyuki, 2002. "Physician-patient communication and patient satisfaction in Japanese cancer consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 301-311, July.
    4. Labrecque, Mark S. & Blanchard, Christina G. & Ruckdeschel, John C. & Blanchard, Edward B., 1991. "The impact of family presence on the physician-cancer patient interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1253-1261, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Nicole & Chou, Yiing-Jenq & Hu, Hsiao-Yun & Lee, Cheng-Hua, 2013. "Gender disparities in AMI management and outcomes among health professionals, their relatives, and non-health professionals in Taiwan from 1997 to 2007," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-74.
    2. Rötzmeier-Keuper, Julia & Hendricks (née Lerch), Jennifer & Wünderlich, Nancy V. & Schmitz, Gertrud, 2018. "Triadic relationships in the context of services for animal companions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 295-303.
    3. Wolff, Jennifer L. & Roter, Debra L., 2011. "Family presence in routine medical visits: A meta-analytical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 823-831, March.
    4. Marla L. Clayman & Carma L. Bylund & Betty Chewning & Gregory Makoul, 2016. "The Impact of Patient Participation in Health Decisions Within Medical Encounters," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(4), pages 427-452, May.
    5. Blair, Thomas R.W., 2012. "“Community ambassadors” for South Asian elder immigrants: Late-life acculturation and the roles of community health workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1769-1777.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eggly, Susan & Penner, Louis A. & Greene, Meredith & Harper, Felicity W.K. & Ruckdeschel, John C. & Albrecht, Terrance L., 2006. "Information seeking during "bad news" oncology interactions: Question asking by patients and their companions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2974-2985, December.
    2. Cartwright, Tina, 2007. "'Getting on with life': The experiences of older people using complementary health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 1692-1703, April.
    3. Gordon, Howard S. & Street, Richard Jr. & Adam Kelly, P. & Souchek, Julianne & Wray, Nelda P., 2005. "Physician-patient communication following invasive procedures: an analysis of post-angiogram consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 1015-1025, September.
    4. Esme Fuller-Thomson & Monica Chi, 2012. "Older Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Limitations: Immigration and Other Factors Associated with Institutionalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Clayman, Marla L. & Roter, Debra & Wissow, Lawrence S. & Bandeen-Roche, Karen, 2005. "Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 1583-1591, April.
    6. Désirée Schoenherr & Jane Paulick & Bernhard M Strauss & Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer & Brian Schwartz & Julian A Rubel & Wolfgang Lutz & Ulrich Stangier & Uwe Altmann, 2019. "Identification of movement synchrony: Validation of windowed cross-lagged correlation and -regression with peak-picking algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Bentur, Netta & Gross, Revital & Brammli-Greenberg, Shuli, 2004. "Satisfaction with and access to community care of the chronically ill in Israel's health system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 129-136, February.
    8. Jae-Hyun Kim & Eun-Cheol Park, 2019. "Can diabetes patients seeking a second hospital get better care? Results from nested case–control study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, January.
    9. Garroutte, Eva Marie & Sarkisian, Natalia & Goldberg, Jack & Buchwald, Dedra & Beals, Janette, 2008. "Perceptions of medical interactions between healthcare providers and American Indian older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 546-556, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:10:p:2307-2320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.