Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Sociological influences on antidepressant prescribing


Author Info

  • Sleath, Betsy
  • Tina Shih, Ya-Chen


This study examined how patient characteristics, physician characteristics, the physician's interaction with the health care system, and the physician's interaction with the patient influenced whether patients with a depression diagnosis received an antidepressant prescription and whether they received a SSRI antidepressant, a non-SSRI antidepressant, or both. The 1998 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), in the USA, was used for the analysis. Logistic regression was used to examine what characteristics influenced whether a patient with a depression diagnosis received an antidepressant prescription. Next, a multinomial logistic regression model was applied to examine the relative risk of using one type of antidepressant versus another among antidepressant users while correcting for possible sample selections using the Heckman selection model. Sixty-seven percent of patients with a depression diagnosis received an antidepressant. Patients who were seeing providers who were not primary care physicians or psychiatrists, self-paying patients, and patients with neurotic depression were significantly less likely to receive an antidepressant prescription. Patients with depression listed as their first diagnosis were significantly more likely to receive an antidepressant prescription. Patients seeing a psychiatrist were more likely than patients seeing a primary care physician to receive a non-SSRI antidepressant than a SSRI antidepressant. Patients belonging to an HMO that had capitated visits were over four times more likely to receive non-SSRI antidepressants than SSRI antidepressants. Patients with major depression were significantly more likely to receive a non-SSRI antidepressant. Patients with depression as their primary diagnosis and patients who saw psychiatrists were significantly more likely to receive both SSRI and non-SSRI antidepressants rather than just SSRI antidepressants. Patient characteristics, physician characteristics, the physician's interaction with the health care system, and the physician's interaction with the patient all influenced antidepressant prescribing. An especially important finding was that insurance status influenced whether patients received an antidepressant. Health care providers need to take the time to help patients without insurance obtain antidepressant medication if it is needed.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

Volume (Year): 56 (2003)
Issue (Month): 6 (March)
Pages: 1335-1344

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:6:p:1335-1344

Contact details of provider:
Web page:

Order Information:

Related research

Keywords: Antidepressant Prescribing Insurance status Depression Sociological influences USA;


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Blanchflower, David G; Oswald, Andrew, 2011. "Antidepressants and Age," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 44, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
  2. repec:cge:warwcg:43 is not listed on IDEAS
  3. Lin, Shu-Jou & Jan, Kuan-An & Kao, Jen-Tse, 2011. "Colleague interactions and new drug prescribing behavior: The case of the initial prescription of antidepressants in Taiwanese medical centers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1208-1213.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:6:p:1335-1344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.