IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i10p1385-1399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effective malaria control in Brazil: Cost-effectiveness of a Malaria Control Program in the Amazon Basin of Brazil, 1988-1996

Author

Listed:
  • Akhavan, Dariush
  • Musgrove, Philip
  • Abrantes, Alexandre
  • Gusmão, Renato d'A.

Abstract

Malaria transmission was controlled elsewhere in Brazil by 1980, but in the Amazon Basin cases increased steadily until 1989, to almost half a million a year and the coefficient of mortality quadrupled in 1977-1988. The government's malaria control program almost collapsed financially in 1987-1989 and underwent a turbulent reorganization in 1991-1993. A World Bank project supported the program from late 1989 to mid-1996, and in 1992-1993, with help from the Pan American Health Organization, facilitated a change toward earlier and more aggressive case treatment and more concentrated vector control. The epidemic stopped expanding in 1990-1991 and reversed in 1992-1996. The total cost of the program from 1989 through mid-1996 was US$616 million: US$526 million for prevention and US$90 million for treatment. Compared to what would have happened in the absence of the program, nearly two million cases of malaria and 231,000 deaths were prevented; the lives saved were due almost equally to preventing infection and to case treatment. Converting the savings in lives and in morbidity into Disability-Adjusted Life Years yields almost nine million DALYs, 5.1 million from treatment and 3.9 million from prevention. Nearly all the gain came from controlling deaths and therefore from controlling falciparum. The overall cost-effectiveness was US$2672 per life saved or US$69 per DALY, which is low compared to most previous estimates and compares favorably to many other disease control interventions. Contrary to much previous experience, case treatment appears more cost-effective than vector control, particularly where falciparum is prevalent and unfocussed insecticide spraying is relatively ineffective. Halting the epidemic by better targeted vector control and emphasizing treatment paid off in much reduced mortality from malaria and in significantly lower costs per life saved.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhavan, Dariush & Musgrove, Philip & Abrantes, Alexandre & Gusmão, Renato d'A., 1999. "Cost-effective malaria control in Brazil: Cost-effectiveness of a Malaria Control Program in the Amazon Basin of Brazil, 1988-1996," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(10), pages 1385-1399, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:10:p:1385-1399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00214-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Macauley, Cameron, 2005. "Aggressive active case detection: a malaria control strategy based on the Brazilian model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 563-573, February.
    2. Veras, Henrique, 2022. "Wrong place, wrong time: The long-run effects of in-utero exposure to malaria on educational attainment," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    3. Kuang-Yao Pan, William & Erlien, Christine & Bilsborrow, Richard E., 2010. "Morbidity and mortality disparities among colonist and indigenous populations in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 401-411, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:10:p:1385-1399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.