IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v46y1998i9p1205-1212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The accuracy of mothers' reports of child vaccination: evidence from rural Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Langsten, Ray
  • Hill, Kenneth

Abstract

Estimates of immunization coverage in developing countries are typically made on a "card plus history" basis, combining information obtained from vaccination cards with information from mothers' reports, for children for whom such cards are not available. A recent survey in rural lower Egypt was able to test the accuracy of mothers' reports for a subset of children whose cards were not seen at round 1 of the survey but were seen a year later at round 3. Comparisons of the unsubstantiated reports at round 1 with information recorded from cards seen at round 3 indicate that mothers' reports are of very high quality; mothers' reports at round 1 were confirmed by card data at round 3 for between 83 and 93%, depending on vaccine, of children aged 12-23 months, and for 88 to 98% of children aged 24-35 months. Mothers of children who had not been vaccinated were more likely to give consistent responses than were mothers of vaccinated children. Thus, these "card plus history" estimates slightly understate true coverage levels. Most of the inconsistencies between round 1 and round 3 data apparently arose from interviewer or data processing error rather than from misreporting by mothers.

Suggested Citation

  • Langsten, Ray & Hill, Kenneth, 1998. "The accuracy of mothers' reports of child vaccination: evidence from rural Egypt," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1205-1212, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:9:p:1205-1212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)10049-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rohini Pande, 2003. "Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: The role of siblings," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 40(3), pages 395-418, August.
    2. Osorio Rivas, Rene & Brito, Steve & Corbacho, Ana, 2013. "Does Birth Underregistration Reduce Childhood Immunization?: Evidence from the Dominican Republic," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4660, Inter-American Development Bank.
    3. Parashar, Sangeeta, 2005. "Moving beyond the mother-child dyad: Women's education, child immunization, and the importance of context in rural India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 989-1000, September.
    4. Gauri, Varun & Khaleghian, Peyvand, 2002. "Immunization in Developing Countries: Its Political and Organizational Determinants," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2109-2132, December.
    5. Suresh Sharma, 2011. "Child Health and Nutritional Status of Children: The Role of Sex Differentials," Working Papers id:4406, eSocialSciences.
    6. Steve Brito & Ana Corbacho & Rene Osorio, 2017. "Does birth under-registration reduce childhood immunization? Evidence from the Dominican Republic," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:9:p:1205-1212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.