IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v44y1997i4p527-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services

Author

Listed:
  • Söderfeldt, Björn
  • Söderfeldt, Marie
  • Jones, Kelvyn
  • O'Campo, Patricia
  • Muntaner, Carles
  • Ohlson, Carl-Göran
  • Warg, Lars-Erik

Abstract

The demand-control model (DC model) in occupational epidemiology suggests that health, an individual attribute, is partly determined by work organization, via the interplay of demand and control, job strain. The objective of this study was empirical assessment of the model's tenet of an organizational determination of individual health. An emerging analytic method, multi-level modelling, permits such an assessment The study encompasses two large Swedish human service organizations. It was based on a nationally representative sample of 291 local organizational units (level 2) with 8296 employees (level 1), a median of 18 employees per unit. 5730 persons (69.1%) completed the questionnaire. Listwise deletion of missing data left a net study base of 4756 individuals in 284 units. Missing data were largely random. Demand and control were measured by standard questions and combined into a job strain index. Two such indices were calculated, one for quantitative demands and one for emotional demands. Individual attributes included age, gender, marital status, having children, social anchorage, and education. There were two dependent variables, self-assessed psychovegetative symptoms (worry, anxiousness, sadness, sleep difficulties, restlessness, and tension) and exhaustion (fatigue, feelings of being used up and overworked), both measured as summative indices. For psychovegetative health, a null model yielded 2.2% level 2 variance, unchanging when individual attributes were included in a random intercepts model. Inclusion of the strain variables rendered level 2 variance non-significant, decreasing level 1 variance by 23% and level 2 variance by 62%. For exhaustion, level 2 variation was 8.3% in the null model and 1.6% in the final model, with strain variables. The strain variables utilized in the DC-model thus draw a substantial part of their variation from the organizational level. It is concluded that the claim of the DC model to rely on organizational factors receives support.

Suggested Citation

  • Söderfeldt, Björn & Söderfeldt, Marie & Jones, Kelvyn & O'Campo, Patricia & Muntaner, Carles & Ohlson, Carl-Göran & Warg, Lars-Erik, 1997. "Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 527-534, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:4:p:527-534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00179-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marklund, Staffan & Bolin, Malin & von Essen, Jan, 2008. "Can individual health differences be explained by workplace characteristics?--A multilevel analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 650-662, February.
    2. Muntaner, Carles & Li, Yong & Xue, Xiaonan & Thompson, Theresa & Chung, HaeJoo & O'Campo, Patricia, 2006. "County and organizational predictors of depression symptoms among low-income nursing assistants in the USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1454-1465, September.
    3. Marx, Axel & van Hootegem, Geert, 2007. "Comparative configurational case analysis of ergonomic injuries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 522-530, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:4:p:527-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.