IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v33y1991i9p1037-1051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor

Author

Listed:
  • Horton, Raymond L.
  • Horton, Patricia J.

Abstract

This article presents two models of the decision to become a potential organ donor. In the first model the act of carrying or requesting an organ donor card is related to values and factual knowledge regarding organ donation, through intervening attitude and willingness constructs. A sample of 286 students is used to test this model via the LISREL computer program for modeling latent variables. All hypothesized relationships had the predicted sign and were significant. This model is extended by adding the variables attitude towards death, prior blood donation, and age of subject to the model. A second sample of 365 adults from the local community is used to test the second model via LISREL. With two exceptions in the adult sample, all hypothesized relationships had the predicted sign and were significant. Where the two models overlap the results are generally similar. Implications of the models for marketing the act of becoming a potential organ donor are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Horton, Raymond L. & Horton, Patricia J., 1991. "A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1037-1051, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:9:p:1037-1051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90009-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reubsaet, A. & Brug, J. & Nijkamp, M.D. & Candel, M.J.J.M. & Hooff, J.P. van & Borne, H.W. van den, 2005. "The impact of an organ donation registration information program for high school students in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 1479-1486, April.
    2. Cosse, Thomas J. & Weisenberger, Terry M., 2000. "Words versus Actions about Organ Donation: A Four-Year Tracking Study of Attitudes and Self-Reported Behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 297-303, December.
    3. Donal McGlade & Carol McClenahan & Barbara Pierscionek, 2014. "Pro-Donation Behaviours of Nursing Students from the Four Countries of the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    4. Schweda, Mark & Schicktanz, Silke, 2009. "Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1129-1136, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:9:p:1037-1051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.