IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v269y2021ics0277953620307863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotions over five years after denial of abortion in the United States: Contextualizing the effects of abortion denial on women's health and lives

Author

Listed:
  • Rocca, Corinne H.
  • Moseson, Heidi
  • Gould, Heather
  • Foster, Diana G.
  • Kimport, Katrina

Abstract

The Turnaway Study was the first to follow women denied abortions because of state law or facility policy over five years. The study has found negative effects on women’s socioeconomic status, physical health, and on their children’s wellbeing. However, women did not suffer lasting mental health consequences, prompting questions about the effects of denial on women’s emotions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocca, Corinne H. & Moseson, Heidi & Gould, Heather & Foster, Diana G. & Kimport, Katrina, 2021. "Emotions over five years after denial of abortion in the United States: Contextualizing the effects of abortion denial on women's health and lives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:269:y:2021:i:c:s0277953620307863
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620307863
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Miller & Laura R. Wherry & Diana Greene Foster, 2023. "The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 394-437, February.
    2. Gerdts, C. & Fuentes, L. & Grossman, D. & White, K. & Keefe-Oates, B. & Baum, S.E. & Hopkins, K. & Stolp, C.W. & Potter, J.E., 2016. "Impact of clinic closures on women obtaining abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(5), pages 857-864.
    3. Upadhyay, U.D. & Weitz, T.A. & Jones, R.K. & Barar, R.E. & Foster, D.G., 2014. "Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(9), pages 1687-1694.
    4. Rocca, Corinne H. & Samari, Goleen & Foster, Diana G. & Gould, Heather & Kimport, Katrina, 2020. "Emotions and decision rightness over five years following an abortion: An examination of decision difficulty and abortion stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Biggs, M.A. & Neuhaus, J.M. & Foster, D.G., 2015. "Mental health diagnoses 3 years after receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(12), pages 2557-2563.
    6. Foster, D.G. & Biggs, M.A. & Ralph, L. & Gerdts, C. & Roberts, S. & Glymour, M.M., 2018. "Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(3), pages 407-413.
    7. Aiken, Abigail R.A. & Dillaway, Chloe & Mevs-Korff, Natasha, 2015. "A blessing I can't afford: Factors underlying the paradox of happiness about unintended pregnancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 149-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 25th January 2021
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2021-01-25 12:01:17

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dickey, Madison S. & Mosley, Elizabeth A. & Clark, Elizabeth A. & Cordes, Sarah & Lathrop, Eva & Haddad, Lisa B., 2022. "“They're forcing people to have children that they can't afford”: a qualitative study of social support and capital among individuals receiving an abortion in Georgia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    2. Caterina Muratori, 2021. "The Impact of Abortion Access on Violence Against Women," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-03, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    3. Sarah C M Roberts & Nancy F Berglas & Katrina Kimport, 2020. "Complex situations: Economic insecurity, mental health, and substance use among pregnant women who consider – but do not have – abortions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Gábor Hajdu & Tamás Hajdu, 2021. "The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children’s socioeconomic outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Jill Barr-Walker & Ruvani T Jayaweera & Ana Maria Ramirez & Caitlin Gerdts, 2019. "Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Stevens, Lindsay M., 2018. "“We have to be mythbusters”: Clinician attitudes about the legitimacy of patient concerns and dissatisfaction with contraception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 145-152.
    7. Clarke, Damian, 2023. "The Economics of Abortion Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 16395, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Na Wang & Debra K. Creedy & Mingna Zhang & Hong Lu & Elizabeth Elder & Jyai Allen & Li Guo & Qian Xiao & Jenny Gamble, 2022. "Designing a Needs-Oriented Psychological Intervention for Chinese Women Undergoing an Abortion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Polina Zvavitch & Michael S. Rendall & Constanza Hurtado-Acuna & Rachel M. Shattuck, 2021. "Contraceptive Consistency and Poverty After Birth," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(6), pages 1277-1311, December.
    10. Gopi Shah Goda & Evan J. Soltas, 2022. "The Impacts of Covid-19 Illnesses on Workers," NBER Working Papers 30435, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Lu, Runjing & Ye, Zihan, 2023. "Roe v. Rates: Reproductive Healthcare and Public Financing Costs," SocArXiv 7t5jz, Center for Open Science.
    12. Weber, Andrea & Bardits, Anna & Adamecz, Anna & Bisztray, Márta & Szabo-Morvai, Agnes, 2023. "Precautionary Fertility: Conceptions, Births, and Abortions around Employment Shocks," CEPR Discussion Papers 17988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Cowan, Sarah K., 2017. "Enacted abortion stigma in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 259-268.
    14. Caitlin Myers, 2024. "Forecasts for a post‐Roe America: The effects of increased travel distance on abortions and births," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 39-62, January.
    15. Yao Lu & David J. G. Slusky, 2019. "The Impact of Women's Health Clinic Closures on Fertility," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(3), pages 334-359, Summer.
    16. Sara Rellstab & Pieter Bakx & Pilar Garci‡-G—mez, 2022. "Human Capital Formation: The Effect of a Miscarriage on Mental Health, Labour Market, and Family Outcomes," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-027/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    17. Kavanaugh, Megan L. & Kost, Kathryn & Frohwirth, Lori & Maddow-Zimet, Isaac & Gor, Vivian, 2017. "Parents' experience of unintended childbearing: A qualitative study of factors that mitigate or exacerbate effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 133-141.
    18. Austin, Nichole & Harper, Sam, 2019. "Constructing a longitudinal database of Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers laws," OSF Preprints tehu4, Center for Open Science.
    19. Sarah C.M. Roberts, 2019. "The Presence and Consequences of Abortion Aversion in Scientific Research Related to Alcohol Use during Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-10, August.
    20. Martha J. Bailey & Jason M. Lindo, 2017. "Access and Use of Contraception and Its Effects on Women’s Outcomes in the U.S," NBER Working Papers 23465, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:269:y:2021:i:c:s0277953620307863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.