IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v196y2018icp142-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The possible worlds of global health research: An ethics-focused discourse analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Brisbois, Ben
  • Plamondon, Katrina

Abstract

Representations of the world enable global health research (GHR), discursively constructing sites in which studies can legitimately take place. Depoliticized portrayals of the global South frequently obscure messy legacies of colonialism and motivate technical responses to health problems with political and economic root causes. Such problematic representations of the world have not yet been rigorously examined in relation to global health ethics, a major site of scholarly effort towards GHR that promotes justice and fairness. We carried out a discourse analysis of four guidance documents relevant to the ethical practice of GHR, purposively selecting texts covering different genres (UN documents and journal articles) and prominent GHR foci (HIV and clinical trials). In light of increasing acknowledgement of the lessons Indigenous health scholarship holds for global health ethics, the four analyzed texts also included a set of principles developed to support Indigenous nation-building. Three of four documents featured global disparities as reasons for ethical caution. These inequalities appeared without explanation or causes, with generation of new scientific knowledge following as a logical response to such disparities. The fourth – Indigenous health-focused – document clearly identified 'colonialism' as a reason for both inequities in society, and related harmful research practices. Solutions to disparities in this text did not necessarily involve cutting-edge research, but focused instead on empowerment and responsiveness to community priorities and needs. These contrasting representations of the world were accomplished in ways that depended on texts' 'participants', or the people they represented; specific vocabularies or language usages; intertextual relationships to prior texts; and overall objectives or intentions of the author(s). Our results illustrate how ethics and other guidance documents serve as an important terrain for constructing, naturalizing or contesting problematic representations of the world of GHR.

Suggested Citation

  • Brisbois, Ben & Plamondon, Katrina, 2018. "The possible worlds of global health research: An ethics-focused discourse analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 142-149.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:196:y:2018:i:c:p:142-149
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617306998
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geissler, P. Wenzel & Kelly, Ann & Imoukhuede, Babatunde & Pool, Robert, 2008. "'He is now like a brother, I can even give him some blood' - Relational ethics and material exchanges in a malaria vaccine 'trial community' in The Gambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 696-707, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fehr, Alexandra & Muela, Joan & Nieto-Sanchez, Claudia & Manneh, Ebrima & Baldeh, Dullo & Ceesay, Omar & Bardají, Azucena & Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun & Bunders-Aelen, Joske, 2021. "The role of social cohesion in the implementation and coverage of a mass drug administration trial for malaria control in the Gambia: An in-depth comparison of two intervention villages," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    2. repec:thr:techub:10018:y:2021:i:1:p:619-624 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Reynolds, Lindsey & Cousins, Thomas & Newell, Marie-Louise & Imrie, John, 2013. "The social dynamics of consent and refusal in HIV surveillance in rural South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 118-125.
    4. Sheikh, Zainab Afshan & Jensen, Anja M.B., 2019. "Channeling hope: An ethnographic study of how research encounters become meaningful for families suffering from genetic disease in Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 103-110.
    5. Gouda, H.N. & Kelly-Hanku, A. & Wilson, L. & Maraga, S. & Riley, I.D., 2016. "“Whenever they cry, I cry with them”: Reciprocal relationships and the role of ethics in a verbal autopsy study in Papua New Guinea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Sariola, Salla & Simpson, Bob, 2011. "Theorising the 'human subject' in biomedical research: International clinical trials and bioethics discourses in contemporary Sri Lanka," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(4), pages 515-521, August.
    7. Kelly, Ann H. & Ameh, David & Majambere, Silas & Lindsay, Steve & Pinder, Margaret, 2010. "'Like sugar and honey': The embedded ethics of a larval control project in The Gambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 1912-1919, June.
    8. Lawrence, David S. & Ssali, Agnes & Moshashane, Neo & Nabaggala, Georgina & Maphane, Lebogang & Harrison, Thomas S. & Meya, David B. & Jarvis, Joseph N. & Seeley, Janet, 2022. "Decision making in a clinical trial for a life-threatening illness: Therapeutic expectation, not misconception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Paraskevi Pegiou & Antonia Kountoura & Stavros Emmanouil & Efthymios Ziagkas, 2021. "Scientific research, current guidelines in the European Union and ethical issues," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 619-624, April.
    10. Hutchinson, Eleanor & Nayiga, Susan & Nabirye, Christine & Taaka, Lilian & Staedke, Sarah G., 2018. "Data value and care value in the practice of health systems: A case study in Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 123-130.
    11. Molyneux, Sassy & Geissler, P. Wenzel, 2008. "Ethics and the ethnography of medical research in Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 685-695, September.
    12. Wahlberg, Ayo & Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph & Sleeboom-Faulkner, Margaret & Lu, Guangxiu & Döring, Ole & Cong, Yali & Laska-Formejster, Alicja & He, Jing & Chen, Haidan & Gottweis, Herbert & Rose, Nikol, 2013. "From global bioethics to ethical governance of biomedical research collaborations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 293-300.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:196:y:2018:i:c:p:142-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.