IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i21p1657-1664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informed consent and patient decision making: Two decades of research

Author

Listed:
  • Kaufmann, Caroline L.

Abstract

Patient consent to medical treatment has been a subject of concern within the United States professional communities for over two decades. This paper traces the development of research literature on patient decision making and informed consent to medical treatment in three fields of research: medicine, law and the social sciences. A general model for stages in the development of scientific specialties is applied as a test for the development of informed consent as a specialty interest in each research field. Results indicate a relatively advanced stage of development within medicine and law. Research in the social science disciplines tend to lag behind in terms of cumulative number of publications. In addition, social science research which is potentially relevant to the ethical and policy issues of consent in medical treatment appears to lack a clear programmatic thrust, with little attention given to the policy implications of the work. In contrast, the medical and legal literatures indicate a direct concern with social policy and reflect attempts on the part of physicians and lawyers to influence the policy making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaufmann, Caroline L., 1983. "Informed consent and patient decision making: Two decades of research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(21), pages 1657-1664, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:21:p:1657-1664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90311-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verheggen, Frank W. S. M. & van Wijmen, Frans C. B., 1996. "Informed consent in clinical trials," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 131-153, May.
    2. Burgess, Michael M., 2007. "Proposing modesty for informed consent," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2284-2295, December.
    3. Singh, Jagdip & Cuttler, Leona & Silvers, J. B., 2004. "Toward understanding consumers' role in medical decisions for emerging treatments: Issues, framework and hypotheses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 1054-1065, September.
    4. Tate, Alexandra, 2020. "Invoking death: How oncologists discuss a deadly outcome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:21:p:1657-1664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.