IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i1p43-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concepts of illness causation and responsibility: Some preliminary data from a sample of working class mothers

Author

Listed:
  • Pill, Roisin
  • Stott, Nigel C. H.

Abstract

In recent years official policy in the U.K. has been marked by a shift in emphasis from curative to preventive medicine, with increasing stress being laid on the role of the individual in maintaining his/her health. However, we lack empirical data on the extent to which the concept of individual responsibility for health is accepted by various groups in our society and such data is essential before effective strategies for health education can be implemented. It is argued that readiness to accept responsibility for one's health depends partly on the views held about the aetiology of illness, and this proposition is explored using material on causation and the circumstances where blame is attributed, derived from semi-structured interviews with a sample of 41 working class mothers (Socio-economic Group 9). Roughly half the sample held fatalistic views on the aetiology of illness and thought they were only morally accountable in very restricted circumstances. These women tended to be less well-educated than the rest of the group and they were less likely to be buying their own homes. The results are discussed in relation to current health education policies, consultation behaviours in primary medical care and consumer attitudes to the services provided by their doctors.

Suggested Citation

  • Pill, Roisin & Stott, Nigel C. H., 1982. "Concepts of illness causation and responsibility: Some preliminary data from a sample of working class mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 43-52, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:1:p:43-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90422-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. Curtis, 1987. "Self reported morbidity in London and Manchester: Intra-urban and inter-urban variations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 255-272, May.
    2. A?ina GÜLERARSLAN & M. Bar?? YILMAZ & Yasemin YILMAZ, 2015. "The Role Of Opinion Leaders Within The Context Of Purchasing Herbal Products For Health," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 3005327, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    3. Emslie, Carol & Hunt, Kate, 2008. "The weaker sex? Exploring lay understandings of gender differences in life expectancy: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 808-816, September.
    4. Davis, Adrian, 2005. "Transport and health--what is the connection? An exploration of concepts of health held by highways committee Chairs in England," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 324-333, July.
    5. Stevenson, Fiona & Knudsen, Pia, 2008. "Discourses of agency and the search for the authentic self: The case of mood-modifying medicines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 170-181, January.
    6. Robinson, Jude & Kirkcaldy, Andrew J., 2007. "'You think that I'm smoking and they're not': Why mothers still smoke in the home," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 641-652, August.
    7. Abbott, Pamela A & Turmov, Sergei & Wallace, Claire, 2006. "Health world views of post-soviet citizens," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 228-238, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:1:p:43-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.