IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v92y2024ics0038012124000223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

School education development index: A meta-frontier range directional measure benefit-of-the-doubt model

Author

Listed:
  • Gulati, Rachita
  • Charles, Vincent
  • Kumar, Sunil

Abstract

While the imperative of gauging school education development across regions is widely acknowledged, a scarcity of methodologically robust measures to quantify it persists. This paper introduces an innovative non-parametric framework for constructing an all-inclusive school education development index (SEDI) across regional entities. The proposed framework, termed “meta-RDM-BoD”, seamlessly integrates three distinct yet interconnected non-parametric efficiency modeling approaches: the range directional measure (RDM) proposed by Portela et al. (2004) [5], the meta-frontier analysis developed by O'Donnell et al. (2008) [6], and the benefit-of-the-doubt (BoD) technique put forth by Melyn and Moesen (1991) [7]. Notably, the proposed framework adeptly handles both desirable and undesirable indicators, accommodates indicators with negative and zero values without compromising the properties of translation and unit invariance, and effectively accounts for underlying heterogeneity across regional entities. To illustrate the efficacy of the SEDI, we provide a compelling example using data on 36 school education indicators for Indian states and union territories in 2021–2022. These indicators cover five crucial dimensions of school education: access to school, school infrastructure and facilities, teacher quality, school outcomes, and equity in education. The results reveal spatial gaps in school education development, offering valuable insights for benchmarking, ranking, and classifying regional entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulati, Rachita & Charles, Vincent & Kumar, Sunil, 2024. "School education development index: A meta-frontier range directional measure benefit-of-the-doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124000223
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    School education development index; Benefit-of-the-doubt; Data envelopment analysis; Range directional measure; Dropouts;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.