IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v33y2017i4p235-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an Economy of Encounters? A critical study of affectual assemblages in coworking

Author

Listed:
  • Jakonen, Mikko
  • Kivinen, Nina
  • Salovaara, Perttu
  • Hirkman, Piia

Abstract

Coworking spaces have been established in great numbers around the globe over the past 10 years. Previous studies on coworking spaces argue that these spaces are designed to enable serendipitous encounters. Here we introduce the concept of an economy of encounters, arguing that both intended and unintended encounters have become a form of production in the knowledge-based new economy. This paper draws upon the critical analysis of three case studies of different coworking settings − two open coworking spaces and a corporate coworking office. Following Deleuze and Guattari, we see coworking spaces as affectual assemblages that create affects that push knowledge workers in flow and motion to enable the formation of new kinds of heterogeneous and constantly changing work communities, where serendipitous encounters become a force of production. We argue that this commodification of a social phenomenon, i.e. the intentional use of affectual assemblages of people, objects and ideas to create serendipitous opportunities, ignores the precariousness of contemporary work.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakonen, Mikko & Kivinen, Nina & Salovaara, Perttu & Hirkman, Piia, 2017. "Towards an Economy of Encounters? A critical study of affectual assemblages in coworking," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 235-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:33:y:2017:i:4:p:235-242
    DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2017.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522117300684
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cunha, Miguel Pina e & Clegg, Stewart R. & Mendonça, Sandro, 2010. "On serendipity and organizing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 319-330, October.
    2. Perttu Salovaara, 2015. "What can the coworking movement tell us about the future of workplaces?," Chapters, in: Leadership in Spaces and Places, chapter 1, pages 27-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurore Dandoy & Albane Grandazzi & Stéphanie Faure, 2019. "Experiencing a New Place as an Atmosphere: A Focus on Tours of Collaborative Spaces," Post-Print halshs-01868036, HAL.
    2. Ilaria Mariotti & Mina Akhavan, 2021. "Gli spazi di coworking prima e durante la pandemia covid-19: tipologie, geografia ed effetti," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 66-84.
    3. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    4. Sophie Boutillier & Ignasi Capdevila & Laurent Dupont & Laure Morel, 2020. "Collaborative spaces promoting creativity and innovation," Post-Print hal-02878132, HAL.
    5. Erik Rådman & Erik Johansson & Petra Bosch-Sijtsema & Hendry Raharjo, 2023. "In search of member needs in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 881-907, April.
    6. Domenico Berdicchia & Fulvio Fortezza & Giovanni Masino, 2023. "The key to happiness in collaborative workplaces. Evidence from coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1213-1242, May.
    7. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Amélie Bohas & Sabine Carton & Julie Fabbri & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2018. "Le futur du travail en 2030 : quatre atmosphères ?," Working Papers halshs-01945379, HAL.
    8. Irene Manzini Ceinar & Ilaria Mariotti, 2021. "Teleworking In Post-Pandemic Times:May Local Coworking Spaces Be The Future Trend?," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 15(1), pages 52-76, JUNE.
    9. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    10. de Vaujany, François-Xavier & Dandoy, Aurore & Grandazzi, Albane & Faure, Stéphanie, 2019. "Experiencing a New Place as an Atmosphere: A Focus on Tours of Collaborative Spaces," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    11. Rebecka Lundgren & Riikka Kyrö & Tuuli Jylhä, 2022. "Access-Based Consumption in the Built Environment: Sharing Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Marko Orel & Manuel Mayerhoffer & Jana Fratricova & Anna Pilkova & Marzena Starnawska & Dora Horvath, 2022. "Coworking spaces as talent hubs: The imperative for community building in the changing context of new work," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1503-1531, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    2. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Le, Tam-Tri, 2021. "Serendipity," OSF Preprints ws8hn, Center for Open Science.
    3. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Le, Tam-Tri, 2021. "Serendipity as a strategic advantage," OSF Preprints 7dv8j, Center for Open Science.
    4. Wareham, Jonathan & Pujol Priego, Laia & Romasanta, Angelo Kenneth & Mathiassen, Thomas Wareham & Nordberg, Markus & Tello, Pablo Garcia, 2022. "Systematizing serendipity for big science infrastructures: The ATTRACT project," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. , Aisdl, 2020. "The Serendipity Mindset," OSF Preprints w52y9, Center for Open Science.
    6. Pina e Cunha, Miguel & Rego, Arménio & Clegg, Stewart & Lindsay, Greg, 2015. "The dialectics of serendipity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 9-18.
    7. Hsi-Peng Lu & Yi-Hsiu Cheng, 2020. "Sustainability in Online Video Hosting Services: The Effects of Serendipity and Flow Experience on Prolonged Usage Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    8. , Aisdl, 2020. "Becoming Attuned," OSF Preprints j7f8y, Center for Open Science.
    9. Victor Cabral & Willem Winden, 2022. "The reaction of coworking spaces to the COVID-19 pandemic. A dynamic capabilities perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(2), pages 257-281, June.
    10. Ohid Yaqub, 2016. "Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," SPRU Working Paper Series 2016-17, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    11. Kosuke Kato & Shin Ito & Kazuhiko Itaya, 2019. "Can Accidental Discoveries be Managed? Exploring Key Factors Impacting Idea Generation in R&D Sites in Japan," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Candiani, Juan Antonio & Gilsing, Victor & Mastrogiorgio, Mariano, 2022. "Technological entry in new niches: Diversity, crowding and generalism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Stock-Homburg, Ruth M. & Heald, Shannon L.M. & Holthaus, Christian & Gillert, Nils Lennart & Hippel, Eric von, 2021. "Need-solution pair recognition by household sector individuals: Evidence, and a cognitive mechanism explanation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    14. Jethromel M. Meneses, 2023. "A Penetrating Effect: From Becquerel’s Serendipity to A Scientific Knowledge," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(5), pages 1061-1080, May.
    15. Umair Akram & Peng Hui & Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Chen Yan & Zubair Akram, 2018. "Factors Affecting Online Impulse Buying: Evidence from Chinese Social Commerce Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, January.
    16. Magni, Massimo & Palmi, Pamela & Salvemini, Severino, 2018. "Under pressure! Team innovative climate and individual attitudes in shaping individual improvisation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 474-484.
    17. Giustiniano, Luca & Cunha, Miguel Pina e & Clegg, Stewart, 2016. "Organizational zemblanity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 7-21.
    18. Fultz, Andrew E.F. & Hmieleski, Keith M., 2021. "The art of discovering and exploiting unexpected opportunities: The roles of organizational improvisation and serendipity in new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    19. Mario Daniele Amore & Mariano Mastrogiorgio, 2022. "Technological Entry, Redeployability, and Firm Value," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1688-1722, November.
    20. Pyung Nahm & Raviv Murciano-Goroff & Michael Park & Russell J. Funk, 2023. "Serendipity in Science," Papers 2308.07519, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:33:y:2017:i:4:p:235-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.