IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v62y2016icp260-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of digital metering methods used in protection and reactive power compensation of micro-grids

Author

Listed:
  • Samet, Haidar

Abstract

Stand-alone micro-grids (MGs) and grid-connected MGs with high penetration level of Distributed Generation (DG) are growing at a fast rate. In these grids, the power quality disturbances such as harmonics, inter-harmonics and deviation from the fundamental frequency are widespread. The influence of these disturbances on two categories of digital metering algorithms is evaluated in this paper. The first category is related to the measurement of the fundamental frequency component of current and voltage signals, which are used as inputs of the digital protection algorithms. Most of the relays only use fundamental frequency component of their input voltage and current signals to fulfill the desired protective functions. The accuracy of the protective relays highly depends on the performance of the applied algorithms for extracting the fundamental components. The second evaluated category is related to the reactive power calculation algorithms, which are used in the static VAr compensator (SVC) control system. Utilizing SVC is growing due to the DGs such as wind turbines magnify voltage fluctuations called flicker. Since the SVC compensates only the reactive power related to the fundamental frequency component, the reactive power signal should not be sensitive to the harmonics. In addition, the reactive power calculation should be fast enough that SVC can follow the abrupt changes to mitigate the flicker, efficiently. In this paper, frequency deviation, harmonic, and inter-harmonic phenomena are considered as the most causes for power quality problems. Their influence in digital metering algorithms is evaluated. It is confirmed that defining new indices is mandatory to fully reflect algorithms׳ accuracy and efficiency. Furthermore, the field measurements of instantaneous voltage and current of a wind farm and electric arc furnaces are used for the evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Samet, Haidar, 2016. "Evaluation of digital metering methods used in protection and reactive power compensation of micro-grids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 260-279.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:260-279
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116300491
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Palizban, Omid & Kauhaniemi, Kimmo & Guerrero, Josep M., 2014. "Microgrids in active network management – part II: System operation, power quality and protection," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 440-451.
    2. Pathak, A.K. & Sharma, M.P & Bundele, Mahesh, 2015. "A critical review of voltage and reactive power management of wind farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 460-471.
    3. Mahela, Om Prakash & Shaik, Abdul Gafoor & Gupta, Neeraj, 2015. "A critical review of detection and classification of power quality events," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 495-505.
    4. Kow, Ken Weng & Wong, Yee Wan & Rajkumar, Rajparthiban Kumar & Rajkumar, Rajprasad Kumar, 2016. "A review on performance of artificial intelligence and conventional method in mitigating PV grid-tied related power quality events," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 334-346.
    5. Saqib, Muhammad A. & Saleem, Ali Z., 2015. "Power-quality issues and the need for reactive-power compensation in the grid integration of wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 51-64.
    6. Kocatepe, Celal & Inan, Aslan & ArIkan, Oktay & YumurtacI, Recep & Kekezoglu, Bedri & Baysal, Mustafa & Bozkurt, Altug & Akkaya, Yener, 2009. "Power quality assessment of grid-connected wind farms considering regulations in turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2553-2561, December.
    7. Taghavi, Reza & Seifi, Ali Reza & Samet, Haidar, 2015. "Stochastic reactive power dispatch in hybrid power system with intermittent wind power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 511-518.
    8. Khokhar, Suhail & Mohd Zin, Abdullah Asuhaimi B. & Mokhtar, Ahmad Safawi B. & Pesaran, Mahmoud, 2015. "A comprehensive overview on signal processing and artificial intelligence techniques applications in classification of power quality disturbances," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1650-1663.
    9. Romo, R. & Micheloud, O., 2015. "Power quality of actual grids with plug-in electric vehicles in presence of renewables and micro-grids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 189-200.
    10. Prakash Mahela, Om & Gafoor Shaik, Abdul, 2016. "Topological aspects of power quality improvement techniques: A comprehensive overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1129-1142.
    11. Samet, Haidar & Hashemi, Farid & Ghanbari, Teymoor, 2015. "Minimum non detection zone for islanding detection using an optimal Artificial Neural Network algorithm based on PSO," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-18.
    12. Samet, Haidar & Marzbani, Fatemeh, 2014. "Quantizing the deterministic nonlinearity in wind speed time series," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1143-1154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sahebi, Ali & Samet, Haidar & Ghanbari, Teymoor, 2017. "Evaluation of power transformer inrush currents and internal faults discrimination methods in presence of fault current limiter," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 102-112.
    2. M. A. Graña-López & A. García-Diez & A. Filgueira-Vizoso & J. Chouza-Gestoso & A. Masdías-Bonome, 2019. "Study of the Sustainability of Electrical Power Systems: Analysis of the Causes that Generate Reactive Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Anaya, K. & Pollitt, M., 2018. "Reactive Power Procurement: Lessons from Three Leading Countries," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1854, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    4. Samet, Haidar & Khorshidsavar, Morteza, 2018. "Analytic time series load flow," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3886-3899.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wajahat Ullah Khan Tareen & Muhammad Aamir & Saad Mekhilef & Mutsuo Nakaoka & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Ben Horan & Mudasir Ahmed Memon & Nauman Anwar Baig, 2018. "Mitigation of Power Quality Issues Due to High Penetration of Renewable Energy Sources in Electric Grid Systems Using Three-Phase APF/STATCOM Technologies: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-41, June.
    2. Tareen, Wajahat Ullah & Mekhilef, Saad & Seyedmahmoudian, Mehdi & Horan, Ben, 2017. "Active power filter (APF) for mitigation of power quality issues in grid integration of wind and photovoltaic energy conversion system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 635-655.
    3. Sahebi, Ali & Samet, Haidar & Ghanbari, Teymoor, 2017. "Evaluation of power transformer inrush currents and internal faults discrimination methods in presence of fault current limiter," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 102-112.
    4. Eslami, Ahmadreza & Negnevitsky, Michael & Franklin, Evan & Lyden, Sarah, 2022. "Review of AI applications in harmonic analysis in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Nantian Huang & Hua Peng & Guowei Cai & Jikai Chen, 2016. "Power Quality Disturbances Feature Selection and Recognition Using Optimal Multi-Resolution Fast S-Transform and CART Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Azcarate, I. & Gutierrez, J.J. & Lazkano, A. & Saiz, P. & Redondo, K. & Leturiondo, L.A., 2016. "Towards limiting the sensitivity of energy-efficient lighting to voltage fluctuations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1384-1395.
    7. Misael Lopez-Ramirez & Eduardo Cabal-Yepez & Luis M. Ledesma-Carrillo & Homero Miranda-Vidales & Carlos Rodriguez-Donate & Rocio A. Lizarraga-Morales, 2018. "FPGA-Based Online PQD Detection and Classification through DWT, Mathematical Morphology and SVD," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Tümay, Mehmet & Demirdelen, Tuğçe & Bal, Selva & Kayaalp, Rahmi İlker & Doğru, Burcu & Aksoy, Mahmut, 2017. "A review of magnetically controlled shunt reactor for power quality improvement with renewable energy applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 215-228.
    9. Matej Žnidarec & Zvonimir Klaić & Damir Šljivac & Boris Dumnić, 2019. "Harmonic Distortion Prediction Model of a Grid-Tie Photovoltaic Inverter Using an Artificial Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Nosratabadi, Seyyed Mostafa & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Gholipour, Eskandar, 2017. "A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 341-363.
    11. Giuseppe Fusco & Mario Russo & Michele De Santis, 2021. "Decentralized Voltage Control in Active Distribution Systems: Features and Open Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, April.
    12. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2020. "Reactive power procurement: A review of current trends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    13. Dawid Buła & Dariusz Grabowski & Marcin Maciążek, 2022. "A Review on Optimization of Active Power Filter Placement and Sizing Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-35, February.
    14. Shah Rukh Abbas & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Muhammad Naqvi & Adeel Javed & Salman Raza Naqvi & Kafait Ullah & Tauseef-ur-Rehman Khan & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2020. "Impact Analysis of Large-Scale Wind Farms Integration in Weak Transmission Grid from Technical Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.
    15. Mahmud, Nasif & Zahedi, A., 2016. "Review of control strategies for voltage regulation of the smart distribution network with high penetration of renewable distributed generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 582-595.
    16. Igual, R. & Medrano, C., 2020. "Research challenges in real-time classification of power quality disturbances applicable to microgrids: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Samet, Haidar & Khorshidsavar, Morteza, 2018. "Analytic time series load flow," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3886-3899.
    18. Boza, Pal & Evgeniou, Theodoros, 2021. "Artificial intelligence to support the integration of variable renewable energy sources to the power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    19. Paweł Pijarski & Piotr Kacejko & Marek Wancerz, 2022. "Voltage Control in MV Network with Distributed Generation—Possibilities of Real Quality Enhancement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Francisco G. Montoya & Raul Baños & Alfredo Alcayde & Maria G. Montoya & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2018. "Power Quality: Scientific Collaboration Networks and Research Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:260-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.