IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v105y2017icp133-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biosaccharification and ethanol production from spent seaweed biomass using marine bacteria and yeast

Author

Listed:
  • Sudhakar, M.P.
  • Jegatheesan, A.
  • Poonam, C.
  • Perumal, K.
  • Arunkumar, K.

Abstract

In this study, fresh and different spent biomasses of agarophytes, alginophytes and seaweed industrial spent biomass were evaluated for ethanol production. Saccharification of spent biomass of seaweeds was carried out using two methods such as mild acid and/or marine bacterial consortia. Total carbohydrate was recorded maximum in the fresh seaweeds (30.71 ± 4.21 and 39.75 ± 3.25% DW in Gracilaria corticata and Sargassum wightii, respectively) than the spent seaweed biomass, whereas reducing sugar production was recorded maximum in the industrial spent samples (14.6 ± 0.57 and 15.27 ± 1.02 g/L in agar and alginate spent, respectively). The mild acid pretreatment followed by bacterial consortia recorded more sugar conversion and ethanol production than the samples directly subjected to bacterial saccharification. The isolated marine yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii AY17 KJ754141, produced maximum ethanol from spent biomass (2.74 and 1.72 g/L in Sargassum ilicifolium and Gracilaria corticata, respectively). The spent biomass from agar and alginate industry recorded maximum of 2.34 and 2.60 g/L of ethanol respectively through ABC saccharification and marine yeast fermentation. Hence, the spent residues from agar and alginate industries, and seaweed spent biomass generated in the laboratory after pigment extraction were considered to be a good source of biomass for ethanol production based on sugar content.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudhakar, M.P. & Jegatheesan, A. & Poonam, C. & Perumal, K. & Arunkumar, K., 2017. "Biosaccharification and ethanol production from spent seaweed biomass using marine bacteria and yeast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 133-139.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:133-139
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116311144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Inn Shi & Lee, Keat Teong, 2014. "Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of seaweed solid wastes for bioethanol production: An optimization study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 53-62.
    2. Ge, Leilei & Wang, Peng & Mou, Haijin, 2011. "Study on saccharification techniques of seaweed wastes for the transformation of ethanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 84-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar, B. Ramesh & Mathimani, Thangavel & Sudhakar, M.P. & Rajendran, Karthik & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Brindhadevi, Kathirvel & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan, 2021. "A state of the art review on the cultivation of algae for energy and other valuable products: Application, challenges, and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Sudhakar, M.P. & Arunkumar, K. & Perumal, K., 2020. "Pretreatment and process optimization of spent seaweed biomass (SSB) for bioethanol production using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 456-471.
    3. Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dehhaghi, Mona & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Karimi, Keikhosro & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "Shifting fuel feedstock from oil wells to sea: Iran outlook and potential for biofuel production from brown macroalgae (ochrophyta; phaeophyceae)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 626-642.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramachandra, T.V. & Hebbale, Deepthi, 2020. "Bioethanol from macroalgae: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Sudhakar, M.P. & Arunkumar, K. & Perumal, K., 2020. "Pretreatment and process optimization of spent seaweed biomass (SSB) for bioethanol production using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 456-471.
    3. Borines, M.G. & de Leon, R.L. & McHenry, M.P., 2011. "Bioethanol production from farming non-food macroalgae in Pacific island nations: Chemical constituents, bioethanol yields, and prospective species in the Philippines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4432-4435.
    4. Nayak, Abhishek & Pulidindi, Indra Neel & Rao, Chinta Sankar, 2020. "Novel strategies for glucose production from biomass using heteropoly acid catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 215-220.
    5. Ben Atitallah, Imen & Ntaikou, Ioanna & Antonopoulou, Georgia & Alexandropoulou, Maria & Brysch-Herzberg, Michael & Nasri, Moncef & Lyberatos, Gerasimos & Mechichi, Tahar, 2020. "Evaluation of the non-conventional yeast strain Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala) X19 for enhanced bioethanol production using date palm sap as renewable feedstock," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 71-81.
    6. Suhaib A. Bandh & Fayaz A. Malla & Irteza Qayoom & Haika Mohi-Ud-Din & Aqsa Khursheed Butt & Aashia Altaf & Shahid A. Wani & Richard Betts & Thanh Hai Truong & Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham & Dao Nam Cao & Sh, 2023. "Importance of Blue Carbon in Mitigating Climate Change and Plastic/Microplastic Pollution and Promoting Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Yang, Peizhou & Guo, Liqiong & Cheng, Shujie & Lou, Nannan & Lin, Junfang, 2011. "Recombinant multi-functional cellulase activity in submerged fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3268-3272.
    8. Herika Mylena Medeiros de Queiroz Andrade & Luiz Pinguelli Rosa & Flavo Elano Soares de Souza & Neilton Fidelis da Silva & Maulori Curié Cabral & Dárlio Inácio Alves Teixeira, 2020. "Seaweed Production Potential in the Brazilian Northeast: A Study on the Eastern Coast of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, RN, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Paz-Cedeno, Fernando Roberto & Henares, Lucas Ragnini & Solorzano-Chavez, Eddyn Gabriel & Scontri, Mateus & Picheli, Flávio Pereira & Miranda Roldán, Ismael Ulises & Monti, Rubens & Conceição de Olive, 2021. "Evaluation of the effects of different chemical pretreatments in sugarcane bagasse on the response of enzymatic hydrolysis in batch systems subject to high mass loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 1-13.
    10. Derman, Eryati & Abdulla, Rahmath & Marbawi, Hartinie & Sabullah, Mohd Khalizan, 2018. "Oil palm empty fruit bunches as a promising feedstock for bioethanol production in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 285-298.
    11. Sirajunnisa, Abdul Razack & Surendhiran, Duraiarasan, 2016. "Algae – A quintessential and positive resource of bioethanol production: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 248-267.
    12. Liu, J. Jay & Dickson, Rofice & Niaz, Haider & Van Hal, Jaap W. & Dijkstra, J.W. & Fasahati, Peyman, 2022. "Production of fuels and chemicals from macroalgal biomass: Current status, potentials, challenges, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Alessandra Cesaro & Vincenzo Belgiorno, 2015. "Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Kouhgardi, Esmaeil & Zendehboudi, Sohrab & Mohammadzadeh, Omid & Lohi, Ali & Chatzis, Ioannis, 2023. "Current status and future prospects of biofuel production from brown algae in North America: Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Jambo, Siti Azmah & Abdulla, Rahmath & Marbawi, Hartinie & Gansau, Jualang Azlan, 2019. "Response surface optimization of bioethanol production from third generation feedstock - Eucheuma cottonii," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Liu, Yang & Chen, Xiaoyi & Wang, Xinhui & Fang, Yang & Zhang, Yin & Huang, Mengjun & Zhao, Hai, 2019. "The influence of different plant hormones on biomass and starch accumulation of duckweed: A renewable feedstock for bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 659-665.
    17. Kostas, Emily T. & Adams, Jessica M.M. & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Durán-Jiménez, Gabriela & Lye, Gary J., 2021. "Macroalgal biorefinery concepts for the circular bioeconomy: A review on biotechnological developments and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    18. Başar, İ.A. & Kökdemir Ünşar, E. & Ünyay, H. & Perendeci, N.A., 2020. "Ethanol, methane, or both? Enzyme dose impact on ethanol and methane production from untreated energy crop switchgrass varieties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 287-297.
    19. Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dehhaghi, Mona & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Karimi, Keikhosro & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "Shifting fuel feedstock from oil wells to sea: Iran outlook and potential for biofuel production from brown macroalgae (ochrophyta; phaeophyceae)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 626-642.
    20. Jambo, Siti Azmah & Abdulla, Rahmath & Mohd Azhar, Siti Hajar & Marbawi, Hartinie & Gansau, Jualang Azlan & Ravindra, Pogaku, 2016. "A review on third generation bioethanol feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 756-769.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:133-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.