IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v93y2008i8p1138-1150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework to practical predictive maintenance modeling for multi-state systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Tan, Cher
  • Raghavan, Nagarajan

Abstract

A simple practical framework for predictive maintenance (PdM)-based scheduling of multi-state systems (MSS) is developed. The maintenance schedules are derived from a system-perspective using the failure times of the overall system as estimated from its performance degradation trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Tan, Cher & Raghavan, Nagarajan, 2008. "A framework to practical predictive maintenance modeling for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1138-1150.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:8:p:1138-1150
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007002207
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2007.09.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kijima, Masaaki & Morimura, Hidenori & Suzuki, Yasusuke, 1988. "Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 194-203, November.
    2. Mohanta, Dusmanta Kumar & Sadhu, Pradip Kumar & Chakrabarti, R., 2007. "Deterministic and stochastic approach for safety and reliability optimization of captive power plant maintenance scheduling using GA/SA-based hybrid techniques: A comparison of results," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 187-199.
    3. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    4. Carnero Moya, M. Carmen, 2004. "The control of the setting up of a predictive maintenance programme using a system of indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 57-75, February.
    5. H. W. Block & W. S. Borges & T. H. Savits, 1988. "A general age replacement model with minimal repair," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 365-372, October.
    6. Kijima, Masaaki & Nakagawa, Toshio, 1992. "Replacement policies of a shock model with imperfect preventive maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 100-110, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marais, Karen B. & Saleh, Joseph H., 2009. "Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance: An analytical framework for capturing its net present value," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 644-657.
    2. Curcurù, Giuseppe & Galante, Giacomo & Lombardo, Alberto, 2010. "A predictive maintenance policy with imperfect monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 989-997.
    3. Nishit Kumar Srivastava & Sandeep Mondal, 2016. "Development of Predictive Maintenance Model for N-Component Repairable System Using NHPP Models and System Availability Concept," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(1), pages 105-115, February.
    4. Lo, Hui-Chiung & Yu, Rouh-Yun, 2013. "A study of quality management strategy for reused products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 172-177.
    5. You, Ming-Yi & Li, Hongguang & Meng, Guang, 2011. "Control-limit preventive maintenance policies for components subject to imperfect preventive maintenance and variable operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 590-598.
    6. Le, Minh Duc & Tan, Cher Ming, 2013. "Optimal maintenance strategy of deteriorating system under imperfect maintenance and inspection using mixed inspectionscheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 21-29.
    7. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Chukova, Stefanka, 2011. "On optimal upgrade level for used products under given cost structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 286-291.
    8. Chao-Hui Huang & Chun-Ho Wang, 2016. "Optimization of preventive maintenance for a multi-state degraded system by monitoring component performance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1151-1170, December.
    9. Yen-Luan Chen & Chin-Chih Chang & Dwan-Fang Sheu, 2016. "Optimum random and age replacement policies for customer-demand multi-state system reliability under imperfect maintenance," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 1130-1141, April.
    10. Liu, Zhitao & Tan, CherMing & Leng, Feng, 2015. "A reliability-based design concept for lithium-ion battery pack in electric vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 169-177.
    11. Xu, Ming & Chen, Tao & Yang, Xianhui, 2012. "Optimal replacement policy for safety-related multi-component multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 87-95.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    2. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    3. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Scarf, P.A., 2013. "Modelling imperfect inspection over a finite horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-29.
    4. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    5. Ammar Y. Alqahtani & Surendra M. Gupta, 2017. "One-Dimensional Renewable Warranty Management within Sustainable Supply Chain," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Doostparast, Mohammad & Kolahan, Farhad & Doostparast, Mahdi, 2014. "A reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 98-106.
    7. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    8. Sergey S. Ketkov & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Lisa M. Maillart, 2023. "Planning of life-depleting preventive maintenance activities with replacements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1461-1483, May.
    9. A Ponchet & M Fouladirad & A Grall, 2011. "Maintenance policy on a finite time span for a gradually deteriorating system with imperfect improvements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 105-116, June.
    10. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.
    11. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    12. Lo, Hui-Chiung & Yu, Rouh-Yun, 2013. "A study of quality management strategy for reused products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 172-177.
    13. Chaabane, K. & Khatab, A. & Diallo, C. & Aghezzaf, E.-H. & Venkatadri, U., 2020. "Integrated imperfect multimission selective maintenance and repairpersons assignment problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Francesco Corman & Sander Kraijema & Milinko Godjevac & Gabriel Lodewijks, 2017. "Optimizing preventive maintenance policy: A data-driven application for a light rail braking system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 534-545, October.
    15. Berthaut, F. & Gharbi, A. & Dhouib, K., 2011. "Joint modified block replacement and production/inventory control policy for a failure-prone manufacturing cell," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 642-654, December.
    16. Toledo, Maria Luíza Guerra de & Freitas, Marta A. & Colosimo, Enrico A. & Gilardoni, Gustavo L., 2015. "ARA and ARI imperfect repair models: Estimation, goodness-of-fit and reliability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 107-115.
    17. Fouladirad, Mitra & Paroissin, Christian & Grall, Antoine, 2018. "Sensitivity of optimal replacement policies to lifetime parameter estimates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 963-975.
    18. Gilardoni, Gustavo L. & de Toledo, Maria Luiza Guerra & Freitas, Marta A. & Colosimo, Enrico A., 2016. "Dynamics of an optimal maintenance policy for imperfect repair models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1104-1112.
    19. Alqahtani, Ammar Y. & Gupta, Surendra M. & Nakashima, Kenichi, 2019. "Warranty and maintenance analysis of sensor embedded products using internet of things in industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 483-499.
    20. Marais, Karen B., 2013. "Value maximizing maintenance policies under general repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 76-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:8:p:1138-1150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.