IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v241y2024ics0951832023005793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sparse moment quadrature for uncertainty modeling and quantification

Author

Listed:
  • Guan, Xuefei

Abstract

This study presents the Sparse Moment Quadrature (SMQ) method, a new uncertainty quantification technique for high-dimensional complex computational models. These models pose a challenge due to the long evaluation times and numerous random parameters. The SMQ method extends the existing moment quadrature method by incorporating the Smolyak rule to reduce the full tensor formula to a sparse tensor formula. The univariate Gauss quadrature rule is derived using the Hankel matrix of moments, allowing the rule to retain polynomial exactness under any distribution with bounded raw moments. Proper decompositions and transformations are used to handle multi-dimensional problems with correlated variables. The cost and accuracy of the method are analyzed and upper bounds are given. The SMQ method is demonstrated through examples involving 10-dimensional problems, dynamical oscillation, 20-, 100-, and 1000-dimensional nonlinear problems, and a practical membrane vibration problem. The proposed method yields nearly identical results to the conventional Monte Carlo method with thousands to millions of model evaluations. Overall, the SMQ method provides a practical solution to uncertainty quantification of high-dimensional problems involving complex computational models.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan, Xuefei, 2024. "Sparse moment quadrature for uncertainty modeling and quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:241:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023005793
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023005793
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Wen & Zheng, Xiaohu & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Ning & Tang, Guijian, 2023. "Deep adaptive arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion: A mini-data-driven semi-supervised method for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. He, Jingjing & Huang, Min & Wang, Wei & Wang, Shaohua & Guan, Xuefei, 2021. "An asymptotic stochastic response surface approach to reliability assessment under multi-source heterogeneous uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2009. "Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 707-716, February.
    4. Bansal, Parth & Zheng, Zhuoyuan & Shao, Chenhui & Li, Jingjing & Banu, Mihaela & Carlson, Blair E & Li, Yumeng, 2022. "Physics-informed machine learning assisted uncertainty quantification for the corrosion of dissimilar material joints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    5. Millar, Robert & Li, Hui & Li, Jinglai, 2023. "Multicanonical sequential Monte Carlo sampler for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2023. "Bayesian updating with adaptive, uncertainty-informed subset simulations: High-fidelity updating with multiple observations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Kröker, Ilja & Oladyshkin, Sergey, 2022. "Arbitrary multi-resolution multi-wavelet-based polynomial chaos expansion for data-driven uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Fan, Xudong & Zhang, Xijin & Yu, Xiong Bill, 2023. "Uncertainty quantification of a deep learning model for failure rate prediction of water distribution networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Xu, Yanwen & Renteria, Anabel & Wang, Pingfeng, 2022. "Adaptive surrogate models with partially observed information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Liu, Yang & Wang, Dewei & Sun, Xiaodong & Liu, Yang & Dinh, Nam & Hu, Rui, 2021. "Uncertainty quantification for Multiphase-CFD simulations of bubbly flows: a machine learning-based Bayesian approach supported by high-resolution experiments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Guan, Xuefei & He, Jingjing & Jha, Ratneshwar & Liu, Yongming, 2012. "An efficient analytical Bayesian method for reliability and system response updating based on Laplace and inverse first-order reliability computations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 1-13.
    12. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Zhang, Xiaoya & Qian, Weiqi & Zhang, Hairui, 2023. "Parameterized coefficient fine-tuning-based polynomial chaos expansion method for sphere-biconic reentry vehicle reliability analysis and design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Yao, Wen & Zheng, Xiaohu & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Ning & Tang, Guijian, 2023. "Deep adaptive arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion: A mini-data-driven semi-supervised method for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Chen, Jie & Yu, Yang & Liu, Yongming, 2022. "Physics-guided mixture density networks for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Kröker, Ilja & Oladyshkin, Sergey, 2022. "Arbitrary multi-resolution multi-wavelet-based polynomial chaos expansion for data-driven uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Wu, Jinhui & Tao, Yourui & Han, Xu, 2023. "Polynomial chaos expansion approximation for dimension-reduction model-based reliability analysis method and application to industrial robots," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    7. Wang, Zequn & Wang, Pingfeng, 2015. "A double-loop adaptive sampling approach for sensitivity-free dynamic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 346-356.
    8. Guo, Zehua & Dailey, Ryan & Feng, Tangtao & Zhou, Yukun & Sun, Zhongning & Corradini, Michael L & Wang, Jun, 2021. "Uncertainty analysis of ATF Cr-coated-Zircaloy on BWR in-vessel accident progression during a station blackout," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    11. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Space-partition method for the variance-based sensitivity analysis: Optimal partition scheme and comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-82.
    12. de Cursi, Eduardo Souza, 2021. "Uncertainty quantification in game theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Wen, Zhixun & Pei, Haiqing & Liu, Hai & Yue, Zhufeng, 2016. "A Sequential Kriging reliability analysis method with characteristics of adaptive sampling regions and parallelizability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 170-179.
    14. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Zhang, Yunyang & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2022. "Consistency regularization-based deep polynomial chaos neural network method for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    16. Palar, Pramudita Satria & Zuhal, Lavi Rizki & Shimoyama, Koji, 2023. "Enhancing the explainability of regression-based polynomial chaos expansion by Shapley additive explanations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    17. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Xu, Yingchun & Wang, Ning, 2024. "Algorithms for Bayesian network modeling and reliability inference of complex multistate systems with common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    19. Iftikhar Ahmad & Ahsan Ayub & Uzair Ibrahim & Mansoor Khan Khattak & Manabu Kano, 2018. "Data-Based Sensing and Stochastic Analysis of Biodiesel Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:241:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023005793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.