IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v232y2023ics0951832022006603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the explainability of regression-based polynomial chaos expansion by Shapley additive explanations

Author

Listed:
  • Palar, Pramudita Satria
  • Zuhal, Lavi Rizki
  • Shimoyama, Koji

Abstract

Surrogate models are indispensable tools in uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis. Polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is one of the most widely used surrogate models, thanks to its faster convergence rate compared to Monte Carlo simulation. In some cases, especially for complex problems, analyzing the complexity of the random input–output relationship (e.g., nonlinearity and interactions between input variables) may reveal additional information and useful insight. To that end, this paper introduces the use of Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to help the explanation of a PCE model. Originating from game theory and machine learning, SHAP computes the contribution of the input variables to the single prediction level. SHAP enables visual inspection of the nonlinearity and interaction between variables from a PCE model. In addition, as an alternative to Sobol indices, SHAP also quantifies the relative importance of the inputs to the output. This paper introduces a procedure to calculate SHAP values from a PCE model without explicitly building multiple PCE models. A fast and exact algorithm that enables the calculation of SHAP for high-dimensional problems is presented. The usefulness of SHAP with PCE is demonstrated on several algebraic and non-algebraic problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Palar, Pramudita Satria & Zuhal, Lavi Rizki & Shimoyama, Koji, 2023. "Enhancing the explainability of regression-based polynomial chaos expansion by Shapley additive explanations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:232:y:2023:i:c:s0951832022006603
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.109045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022006603
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2022.109045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ning & Xu, Yan & Wang, Sutong, 2022. "Interpretable boosting tree ensemble method for multisource building fire loss prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2009. "Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 707-716, February.
    3. Pan, Qiujing & Dias, Daniel, 2017. "Sliced inverse regression-based sparse polynomial chaos expansions for reliability analysis in high dimensions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-493.
    4. Lim, HyeongUk & Manuel, Lance, 2021. "Distribution-free polynomial chaos expansion surrogate models for efficient structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    6. Ehre, Max & Papaioannou, Iason & Straub, Daniel, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis in high dimensions with PLS-PCE," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Adland, Roar & Jia, Haiying & Lode, Tønnes & Skontorp, Jørgen, 2021. "The value of meteorological data in marine risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Mara, Thierry A. & Becker, William E., 2021. "Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis of model output with dependent inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    9. Zhou, Yicheng & Lu, Zhenzhou & Yun, Wanying, 2020. "Active sparse polynomial chaos expansion for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Schöbi, Roland & Sudret, Bruno, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis in the context of imprecise probabilities (p-boxes) using sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 129-141.
    11. Amini, Mostafa & Bagheri, Ali & Delen, Dursun, 2022. "Discovering injury severity risk factors in automobile crashes: A hybrid explainable AI framework for decision support," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Zhang, Xiaoya & Qian, Weiqi & Zhang, Hairui, 2023. "Parameterized coefficient fine-tuning-based polynomial chaos expansion method for sphere-biconic reentry vehicle reliability analysis and design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao, Wen & Zheng, Xiaohu & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Ning & Tang, Guijian, 2023. "Deep adaptive arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion: A mini-data-driven semi-supervised method for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Shang, Yue & Nogal, Maria & Teixeira, Rui & Wolfert, A.R. (Rogier) M., 2024. "Extreme-oriented sensitivity analysis using sparse polynomial chaos expansion. Application to train–track–bridge systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Nguyen, Phong T.T. & Manuel, Lance, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification in low-probability response estimation using sliced inverse regression and polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Xu, Hui & Grigoriu, Mircea D. & Gurley, Kurtis R., 2023. "A novel surrogate for extremes of random functions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2023. "Extended sample-based approach for efficient sensitivity analysis of group of random variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Wang, Zequn & Wang, Pingfeng, 2015. "A double-loop adaptive sampling approach for sensitivity-free dynamic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 346-356.
    7. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Zhang, Yunyang & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2022. "Consistency regularization-based deep polynomial chaos neural network method for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    10. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    12. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    13. Cremona, Marzia A. & Liu, Binbin & Hu, Yang & Bruni, Stefano & Lewis, Roger, 2016. "Predicting railway wheel wear under uncertainty of wear coefficient, using universal kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 49-59.
    14. Liu, Zicheng & Lesselier, Dominique & Sudret, Bruno & Wiart, Joe, 2020. "Surrogate modeling based on resampled polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    15. Zhang, Qiang & Zhao, Yan-Gang & Kolozvari, Kristijan & Xu, Lei, 2022. "Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete structure against progressive collapse," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Ehre, Max & Papaioannou, Iason & Straub, Daniel, 2020. "A framework for global reliability sensitivity analysis in the presence of multi-uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Awad, Mahmoud, 2017. "Analyzing sensitivity measures using moment-matching technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 90-99.
    18. Barry Anderson & Emanuele Borgonovo & Marzio Galeotti & Roberto Roson, 2014. "Uncertainty in Climate Change Modeling: Can Global Sensitivity Analysis Be of Help?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 271-293, February.
    19. Zhang, Jian & Gong, Weijie & Yue, Xinxin & Shi, Maolin & Chen, Lei, 2022. "Efficient reliability analysis using prediction-oriented active sparse polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:232:y:2023:i:c:s0951832022006603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.