IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v80y2013icp21-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment

Author

Listed:
  • Kissling, Ramon
  • Coughlan, Damian
  • Fitzpatrick, Colin
  • Boeni, Heinz
  • Luepschen, Claudia
  • Andrew, Stefan
  • Dickenson, John

Abstract

This paper aims to identify specific and generic success factors and barriers in the re-use of electrical and electronic equipment for a variety of different operating models. The scope of the study is information and communication technologies (ICT) and large household appliances. Success factors and barriers for re-use were identified through the conducting of semi-structured interviews with 28 case study partners representing the different models. A list of generic success factors and barriers was identified. From this generic list, the re-use success factors and barriers were ranked by the interviewees with regards to their importance. On the one hand, the difficulty in accessing sufficient volumes of good quality used equipment and the lack of legislations, which support, incentivize and – if necessary – enforce this access, were identified as most impactful barriers. On the other hand, the control and securing of product and process quality were ranked as most important success factors. Re-use organisations, which adhere to good re-use practices, differentiate themselves through quality guarantee from non-compliant, informal competitors. Moreover, proven quality strengthens confidence in re-use of important stakeholders like suppliers, customers, authorities and the general public. Differences in reuse barriers and success factors were also explored for varying geographical regions, product category and operating models.

Suggested Citation

  • Kissling, Ramon & Coughlan, Damian & Fitzpatrick, Colin & Boeni, Heinz & Luepschen, Claudia & Andrew, Stefan & Dickenson, John, 2013. "Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 21-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:80:y:2013:i:c:p:21-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344913001572
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Truttmann, Nina & Rechberger, Helmut, 2006. "Contribution to resource conservation by reuse of electrical and electronic household appliances," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 249-262.
    2. Eric Williams, 2011. "Environmental effects of information and communications technologies," Nature, Nature, vol. 479(7373), pages 354-358, November.
    3. Thomas, Valerie M., 2009. "A universal code for environmental management of products," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 400-408.
    4. Kissling, Ramon & Fitzpatrick, Colin & Boeni, Heinz & Luepschen, Claudia & Andrew, Stefan & Dickenson, John, 2012. "Definition of generic re-use operating models for electrical and electronic equipment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 85-99.
    5. Kahhat, Ramzy & Kim, Junbeum & Xu, Ming & Allenby, Braden & Williams, Eric & Zhang, Peng, 2008. "Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 955-964.
    6. Temitope Oshikoya & Nureldin Hussain, 1998. "Information Technology and the Challenge of Economic Development in Africa," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 10(1), pages 100-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milovantseva, Natalia & Fitzpatrick, Colin, 2015. "Barriers to electronics reuse of transboundary e-waste shipment regulations: An evaluation based on industry experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 170-177.
    2. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    3. Carl Dalhammar & Emelie Wihlborg & Leonidas Milios & Jessika Luth Richter & Sahra Svensson-Höglund & Jennifer Russell & Åke Thidell, 2021. "Enabling Reuse in Extended Producer Responsibility Schemes for White Goods: Legal and Organisational Conditions for Connecting Resource Flows and Actors," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    4. Moura, J.M.B.M. & Gohr Pinheiro, I. & Lischeski, D. & Valle, J.A.B., 2017. "Relation of Brazilian institutional users and technical assistances with electronics and their waste: What has changed?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 68-75.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Byung Moo Lee, 2017. "Energy Efficiency Gain of Cellular Base Stations with Large-Scale Antenna Systems for Green Information and Communication Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Milovantseva, Natalia & Fitzpatrick, Colin, 2015. "Barriers to electronics reuse of transboundary e-waste shipment regulations: An evaluation based on industry experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 170-177.
    4. Mallawarachchi, Harshani & Karunasena, Gayani, 2012. "Electronic and electrical waste management in Sri Lanka: Suggestions for national policy enhancements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-53.
    5. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    6. Lee, Michael James & Rahimifard, Shahin, 2012. "An air-based automated material recycling system for postconsumer footwear products," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 90-99.
    7. Pei-Yi Lin & Ching Sing Chai & Morris Siu-Yung Jong, 2019. "A PISA-2015 Comparative Meta-Analysis between Singapore and Finland: Relations of Students’ Interest in Science, Perceived ICT Competence, and Environmental Awareness and Optimism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Hatice Demirtas Dogan & Bulut Gurpinar, 2023. "Green Libraries and the User’s Perspective: A Case Study in Turkey," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    9. Emad Kazemzadeh & José Alberto Fuinhas & Narges Salehnia & Fariba Osmani, 2023. "The effect of economic complexity, fertility rate, and information and communication technology on ecological footprint in the emerging economies: a two-step stirpat model and panel quantile regressio," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 737-763, February.
    10. Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut, 2007. "Treatment of cooling appliances: Interrelations between environmental protection, resource conservation, and recovery rates," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 136-155.
    11. Krikke, Harold & Hofenk, Dianne & Wang, Yacan, 2013. "Revealing an invisible giant: A comprehensive survey into return practices within original (closed-loop) supply chains," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 239-250.
    12. Menzie D. Chinn & Robert W. Fairlie, 2007. "The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 59(1), pages 16-44, January.
    13. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Nicola Saccani & Marco Perona & Irene Baccanelli, 2020. "Towards Circular Economy in the Household Appliance Industry: An Overview of Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Martiskainen, Mari & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D., 2021. "Knowledge, energy sustainability, and vulnerability in the demographics of smart home technology diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    15. Lu, Yan & Xu, Zhenming, 2016. "Precious metals recovery from waste printed circuit boards: A review for current status and perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 28-39.
    16. Saia, Artjom, 2023. "Digitalization and CO2 emissions: Dynamics under R&D and technology innovation regimes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Nnorom, I.C. & Osibanjo, O. & Ogwuegbu, M.O.C., 2011. "Global disposal strategies for waste cathode ray tubes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 275-290.
    18. Yi Cui & Thomas Glauben & Wei Si & Qiran Zhao, 2023. "The effect of Internet usage on dietary quality: Evidence from rural China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1478-1494, December.
    19. Torsten Hummen & Stefanie Hellweg & Ramin Roshandel, 2023. "Optimizing Lifespan of Circular Products: A Generic Dynamic Programming Approach for Energy-Using Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Mengyu Zhang & Xiaoyu Ma & Jiamin Liu, 2024. "Can Infrastructure Upgrading Achieve the Synergistic Effect of Pollution Reduction and Carbon Reduction? Evidence from the High-Speed Rail and “Broadband China” Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:80:y:2013:i:c:p:21-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.