IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v52y2007i1p136-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatment of cooling appliances: Interrelations between environmental protection, resource conservation, and recovery rates

Author

Listed:
  • Laner, David
  • Rechberger, Helmut

Abstract

The treatment of cooling appliances in Austria is primarily influenced by two factors. On the one hand is their changing composition and on the other hand the ordinance on Waste Prevention, Collection and Treatment of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE ordinance), which stipulates a minimum recycling rate of 75% for cooling appliances. This paper investigates whether this recycling rate leads to optimal treatment practices for cooling appliances with respect to resource conservation and environmental protection. Two different treatment technologies which achieve recycling rates between 50–60% and 80–90%, respectively, are compared both for cooling appliances containing Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and for appliances containing Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Materials and energy balances are developed for each model. To evaluate resource consumption, expenditures as well as savings of energy and materials are incorporated via the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED). In order to analyse the environmental impact of the different practices, balances for CFC, CO2, HF, HCl and solid residues are established.

Suggested Citation

  • Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut, 2007. "Treatment of cooling appliances: Interrelations between environmental protection, resource conservation, and recovery rates," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 136-155.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:52:y:2007:i:1:p:136-155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344907000523
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.03.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Truttmann, Nina & Rechberger, Helmut, 2006. "Contribution to resource conservation by reuse of electrical and electronic household appliances," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 249-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jujun, Ruan & Yiming, Qian & Zhenming, Xu, 2014. "Environment-friendly technology for recovering nonferrous metals from e-waste: Eddy current separation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 109-116.
    2. Joris Baars & Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Oliver Heidrich, 2022. "Quo vadis MFA? Integrated material flow analysis to support material efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1487-1503, August.
    3. Ardente, Fulvio & Calero Pastor, Maria & Mathieux, Fabrice & Talens Peiró, Laura, 2015. "Analysis of end-of-life treatments of commercial refrigerating appliances: Bridging product and waste policies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 42-52.
    4. Manomaivibool, Panate & Hong, Jong Ho, 2014. "Two decades, three WEEE systems: How far did EPR evolve in Korea's resource circulation policy?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 202-212.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Nicola Saccani & Marco Perona & Irene Baccanelli, 2020. "Towards Circular Economy in the Household Appliance Industry: An Overview of Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Torsten Hummen & Stefanie Hellweg & Ramin Roshandel, 2023. "Optimizing Lifespan of Circular Products: A Generic Dynamic Programming Approach for Energy-Using Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Iakovou, E. & Moussiopoulos, N. & Xanthopoulos, A. & Achillas, Ch. & Michailidis, N. & Chatzipanagioti, M. & Koroneos, C. & Bouzakis, K.-D. & Kikis, V., 2009. "A methodological framework for end-of-life management of electronic products," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 329-339.
    4. Kissling, Ramon & Fitzpatrick, Colin & Boeni, Heinz & Luepschen, Claudia & Andrew, Stefan & Dickenson, John, 2012. "Definition of generic re-use operating models for electrical and electronic equipment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 85-99.
    5. Van Eygen, Emile & De Meester, Steven & Tran, Ha Phuong & Dewulf, Jo, 2016. "Resource savings by urban mining: The case of desktop and laptop computers in Belgium," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 53-64.
    6. Barba-Gutiérrez, Y. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Hopp, M., 2008. "An analysis of some environmental consequences of European electrical and electronic waste regulation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 481-495.
    7. Allwood, Julian M. & Ashby, Michael F. & Gutowski, Timothy G. & Worrell, Ernst, 2011. "Material efficiency: A white paper," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 362-381.
    8. Siliang Yi & Chuyuan Zou, 2023. "Assessing Transformation Practices in China under Energy and Environmental Policy Goals: A Green Design Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Buchner, Hanno & Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut & Fellner, Johann, 2014. "In-depth analysis of aluminum flows in Austria as a basis to increase resource efficiency," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 112-123.
    10. Kissling, Ramon & Coughlan, Damian & Fitzpatrick, Colin & Boeni, Heinz & Luepschen, Claudia & Andrew, Stefan & Dickenson, John, 2013. "Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 21-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:52:y:2007:i:1:p:136-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.