IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v55y1998i2p191-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imperfect maintenance policies for deteriorating production systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng-Tsaing Tseng
  • Ruey Huei Yeh
  • Wen-Tsung Ho

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng-Tsaing Tseng & Ruey Huei Yeh & Wen-Tsung Ho, 1998. "Imperfect maintenance policies for deteriorating production systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 191-201, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:55:y:1998:i:2:p:191-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(98)00059-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A. Butler, 1979. "A Hazardous-Inspection Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 79-89, January.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1987. "Simultaneous Determination of Production Cycle and Inspection Schedules in a Production System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1125-1136, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liao, Gwo-Liang & Chen, Yen Hung & Sheu, Shey-Huei, 2009. "Optimal economic production quantity policy for imperfect process with imperfect repair and maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 348-357, June.
    2. Liao, Gwo-Liang & Sheu, Shey-Huei, 2011. "Economic production quantity model for randomly failing production process with minimal repair and imperfect maintenance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 118-124, March.
    3. Liao, Gwo-Liang, 2007. "Optimal production correction and maintenance policy for imperfect process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1140-1149, November.
    4. Guo R. & Ascher H. & Love E., 2001. "Towards Practical and Synthetical Modelling of Repairable Systems," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 147-182, January.
    5. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila, 2016. "Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 263-271.
    6. A. Azadeh & M. Sheikhalishahi & S. Mortazavi & E. Ahmadi Jooghi, 2017. "Joint quality control and preventive maintenance strategy: a unique taguchi approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 123-134, March.
    7. Ruey Yeh & Wen Chang & Hui-Chiung Lo, 2010. "Optimal threshold values of age and two-phase maintenance policy for leased equipments using age reduction method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 171-183, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    2. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    3. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    4. Maria R. Ibanez & Michael W. Toffel, 2020. "How Scheduling Can Bias Quality Assessment: Evidence from Food-Safety Inspections," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2396-2416, June.
    5. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.
    6. Leung, Francis Kit-nam, 2001. "Inspection schedules when the lifetime distribution of a single-unit system is completely unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 106-115, July.
    7. Chih‐Hsiung Wang, 2006. "Optimal production and maintenance policy for imperfect production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 151-156, March.
    8. Yu, Hong-Fwu & Yu, Wen-Ching, 2007. "An optimal mixed policy of inspection and burn-in and the optimal production quantity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 483-491, February.
    9. Abu Hashan Md Mashud & Hui-Ming Wee & Chiao-Ven Huang & Jei-Zheng Wu, 2020. "Optimal Replenishment Policy for Deteriorating Products in a Newsboy Problem with Multiple Just-in-Time Deliveries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Chiu, Singa Wang & Wang, Shan-Ling & Chiu, Yuan-Shyi Peter, 2007. "Determining the optimal run time for EPQ model with scrap, rework, and stochastic breakdowns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 664-676, July.
    11. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    12. Hu, Fei & Zong, Qun, 2009. "Optimal production run time for a deteriorating production system under an extended inspection policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 979-986, August.
    13. B C Giri & T Dohi, 2005. "Exact formulation of stochastic EMQ model for an unreliable production system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(5), pages 563-575, May.
    14. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Nahas, Nabil & Ben-Daya, Mohamed, 2016. "Integrated preventive maintenance and production decisions for imperfect processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 21-31.
    15. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    16. Tang, Kwei & Gong, Linguo & Chang, Dong-Shang, 2003. "Optimal process control policies under a time-varying cost structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 197-210, August.
    17. Chakraborty, Tulika & Giri, B.C. & Chaudhuri, K.S., 2008. "Production lot sizing with process deterioration and machine breakdown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 606-618, March.
    18. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    19. Herbon, Avi, 2020. "An approximated solution to the constrained integrated manufacturer-buyer supply problem," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    20. Rezapour, Shabnam & Allen, Janet K. & Mistree, Farrokh, 2015. "Uncertainty propagation in a supply chain or supply network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-206.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:55:y:1998:i:2:p:191-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.