IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v53y2006i2p151-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal production and maintenance policy for imperfect production systems

Author

Listed:
  • Chih‐Hsiung Wang

Abstract

A joint optimization of the production run length and preventive maintenance (PM) policy is studied for a deteriorating production system where the in‐control period follows a general probability distribution with non‐decreasing failure rate. In the literature, the sufficient conditions for the optimality of the equal‐interval PM schedule is explored to derive an optimal production run length and an optimal number of PM actions. Nevertheless, an exhaustive search may arise. In this study, based on the assumption that the conditions for the optimality of the equal‐interval PM schedule hold, we derive some structural properties for the optimal production/PM policy, which increases the efficiency of the solution procedure. These analyses have implications for the practical application of the production/PM model to be more available in practice. A numerical example of gamma shift distribution with non‐decreasing failure rates is used to illustrate the solution procedure, leading to some insight into the management process. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Chih‐Hsiung Wang, 2006. "Optimal production and maintenance policy for imperfect production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 151-156, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:53:y:2006:i:2:p:151-156
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20124
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyun Kim, Chang & Hong, Yushin, 1999. "An optimal production run length in deteriorating production processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 183-189, January.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1987. "Simultaneous Determination of Production Cycle and Inspection Schedules in a Production System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1125-1136, September.
    3. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chakraborty, Tulika & Giri, B.C. & Chaudhuri, K.S., 2008. "Production lot sizing with process deterioration and machine breakdown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 606-618, March.
    2. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lee, Zong-Zhe, 2005. "Joint determination of production run length and number of standbys in a deteriorating production process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 359-371, April.
    3. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    4. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    5. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    6. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.
    7. Wang, Chih-Hsiung, 2005. "Integrated production and product inspection policy for a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 123-134, January.
    8. Chiu, Singa Wang & Wang, Shan-Ling & Chiu, Yuan-Shyi Peter, 2007. "Determining the optimal run time for EPQ model with scrap, rework, and stochastic breakdowns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 664-676, July.
    9. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    10. Hu, Fei & Zong, Qun, 2009. "Optimal production run time for a deteriorating production system under an extended inspection policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 979-986, August.
    11. B C Giri & T Dohi, 2005. "Exact formulation of stochastic EMQ model for an unreliable production system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(5), pages 563-575, May.
    12. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Nahas, Nabil & Ben-Daya, Mohamed, 2016. "Integrated preventive maintenance and production decisions for imperfect processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 21-31.
    13. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    14. Tang, Kwei & Gong, Linguo & Chang, Dong-Shang, 2003. "Optimal process control policies under a time-varying cost structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 197-210, August.
    15. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    16. W. Pearn & R. Su & M. Weng & C. Hsu, 2011. "Optimal production run time for two-stage production system with imperfect processes and allowable shortages," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(4), pages 533-545, December.
    17. Harun Öztürk, 2019. "Modeling an inventory problem with random supply, inspection and machine breakdown," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 497-527, June.
    18. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila, 2016. "Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 263-271.
    19. Oshmita Dey, 2019. "A fuzzy random integrated inventory model with imperfect production under optimal vendor investment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 101-115, March.
    20. Om Prakash & A.R. Roy & A. Goswami, 2014. "Stochastic manufacturing system with process deterioration and machine breakdown," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 2539-2551, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:53:y:2006:i:2:p:151-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.