IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v185y2017icp266-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A heuristic solution method for disassemble-to-order problems with binomial disassembly yields

Author

Listed:
  • Inderfurth, Karl
  • Langella, Ian M.
  • Transchel, Sandra
  • Vogelgesang, Stephanie

Abstract

In disassemble-to-order problems, where a specific amount of several components must be obtained from the disassembly of several types of returned products, random disassembly yields create a formidable challenge for appropriate planning. In this context, it is typically assumed that yields from disassembly are either stochastically proportional or follow a binomial process. In the case of yield process misspecification, it has been shown (see Inderfurth et al. (2015)) that assuming binomial yields usually results in a lower penalty than assuming stochastically proportional yields. While there have been heuristics developed for the disassemble-to-order problem with stochastically proportional yields, a suitable, powerful heuristic for binomial yields is needed in order to facilitate solving problems with complex real-world product structures. We present a heuristic approach that is based on a decomposition procedure for the underlying non-linear stochastic optimization problem and that can be applied to problems of arbitrary size. A comprehensive numerical performance study using both randomly generated instances as well as a full factorial experimental design and, additionally, the data of a practical case example reveals that this heuristic delivers close-to-optimal results.

Suggested Citation

  • Inderfurth, Karl & Langella, Ian M. & Transchel, Sandra & Vogelgesang, Stephanie, 2017. "A heuristic solution method for disassemble-to-order problems with binomial disassembly yields," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 266-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:185:y:2017:i:c:p:266-274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527317300063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mukhopadhyay, Samar K. & Ma, Huafan, 2009. "Joint procurement and production decisions in remanufacturing under quality and demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 5-17, July.
    2. Inderfurth, Karl & Vogelgesang, Stephanie & Langella, Ian M., 2015. "How yield process misspecification affects the solution of disassemble-to-order problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 56-67.
    3. Abraham Grosfeld-Nir & Yigal Gerchak, 2004. "Multiple Lotsizing in Production to Order with Random Yields: Review of Recent Advances," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 43-69, February.
    4. Marie Coffin & Matthew J. Saltzman, 2000. "Statistical Analysis of Computational Tests of Algorithms and Heuristics," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 24-44, February.
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    6. Kongar, Elif & Gupta, Surendra M., 2006. "Disassembly to order system under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 550-561, December.
    7. E A Silver, 2004. "An overview of heuristic solution methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 936-956, September.
    8. Grosfeld-Nir, Abraham, 1995. "Single bottleneck systems with proportional expected yields and rigid demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 297-307, January.
    9. Candace Arai Yano & Hau L. Lee, 1995. "Lot Sizing with Random Yields: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 311-334, April.
    10. Teunter, Ruud H. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P., 2011. "Optimal core acquisition and remanufacturing policies under uncertain core quality fractions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 241-248, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Talay, Işılay & Özdemir-Akyıldırım, Öznur, 2019. "Optimal procurement and production planning for multi-product multi-stage production under yield uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 536-551.
    2. Meng, Kai & Cao, Ying & Peng, Xianghui & Prybutok, Victor & Gupta, Varun, 2020. "Demand-dependent recovery decision-making of a batch of products for sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Kleber, Rainer & Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Reimann, Marc, 2023. "The role of part failure rates asymmetry and spare part proprietariness on remanufacturing decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 185-200.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Vogelgesang & Ian M. Langella & Karl Inderfurth, 2012. "How Yield Process Misspecification Affects the Solution of Disassemble-to-order Problems," FEMM Working Papers 120029, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    2. Liu, Kanglin & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2018. "Capacitated disassembly scheduling under stochastic yield and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 244-257.
    3. Inderfurth, Karl & Vogelgesang, Stephanie & Langella, Ian M., 2015. "How yield process misspecification affects the solution of disassemble-to-order problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 56-67.
    4. Grosfeld-Nir, Abraham & Anily, Shoshana & Ben-Zvi, Tal, 2006. "Lot-sizing two-echelon assembly systems with random yields and rigid demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(2), pages 600-616, September.
    5. Oh, Yosep & Behdad, Sara, 2017. "Simultaneous reassembly and procurement planning in assemble-to-order remanufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 168-178.
    6. Liu, Jian & Mantin, Benny & Song, Xuefeng, 2022. "Rent, sell, and remanufacture: The manufacturer's choice when remanufacturing can be outsourced," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 184-200.
    7. Zare, Marjan & Esmaeili, Maryam & He, Yuanjie, 2019. "Implications of risk-sharing strategies on supply chains with multiple retailers and under random yield," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 413-424.
    8. M-C Wu & L-C Huang & H-M Hsu & T-S Su, 2011. "Multiple lot-sizing decisions in a two-stage production with an interrupted geometric yield and non-rigid demand," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(6), pages 1075-1084, June.
    9. Grosfeld-Nir, Abraham, 2005. "A two-bottleneck system with binomial yields and rigid demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 231-250, August.
    10. Talay, Işılay & Özdemir-Akyıldırım, Öznur, 2019. "Optimal procurement and production planning for multi-product multi-stage production under yield uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 536-551.
    11. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    12. Gong, Hailei & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2022. "Benders decomposition for the distributionally robust optimization of pricing and reverse logistics network design in remanufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 496-510.
    13. Saurabh Bansal & Mahesh Nagarajan, 2017. "Product Portfolio Management with Production Flexibility in Agribusiness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 914-930, August.
    14. Panagiotidou, Sofia & Nenes, George & Zikopoulos, Christos & Tagaras, George, 2017. "Joint optimization of manufacturing/remanufacturing lot sizes under imperfect information on returns quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 537-551.
    15. Abraham Grosfeld-Nir & Yigal Gerchak, 2002. "Multistage Production to Order with Rework Capability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 652-664, May.
    16. Gel, Esma S. & Salman, F. Sibel, 2022. "Dynamic ordering decisions with approximate learning of supply yield uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Hong Sun & Yan Li, 2023. "Optimal Acquisition and Production Policies for Remanufacturing with Quality Grading," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Wen-Ya Wang & Diwakar Gupta, 2014. "Nurse Absenteeism and Staffing Strategies for Hospital Inpatient Units," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 439-454, July.
    19. Emad Sane Zerang & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Jafar Razmi, 2018. "Analytical comparisons in a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with price and marketing effort-dependent demand: game theory approaches," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 451-478, February.
    20. Avi Herbon & Konstantin Kogan, 2014. "Time-dependent and independent control rules for coordinated production and pricing under demand uncertainty and finite planning horizons," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 195-216, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:185:y:2017:i:c:p:266-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.