IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v61y2020ics0927538x19305128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The magnet effect of circuit breakers and its interactions with price limits

Author

Listed:
  • Wong, Kin Ming
  • Kong, Xiao Wei
  • Li, Min

Abstract

Using the rare triggers of market-wide circuit breaker in the Chinese stock markets, we study the magnet effect of the trading halts on stock returns and its interaction with the magnet effect of price limits. Theory suggests that the existence of circuit breaker could actually make the price accelerate toward the boundaries when it gets closer to the limits (the magnet effect), but empirical evidence is scanty. In this paper, we provide evidences on the magnet effect of circuit breaker using high-frequency market index returns and individual stock returns. Furthermore, our empirical tests for the individual stock returns suggest that magnet effect of circuit breaker does not only coexist but also interacts with the magnet effect of price ceiling limit. Based on a small group of stocks that hit their price ceilings during the market collapse, the magnet effect of price ceiling is found to accelerate when a trigger of market-wide circuit breaker is more likely. In one of the circuit breaker proximity measures, the magnet effect of price ceiling increased six-fold when the market index approached to 3% from the circuit breaker threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Wong, Kin Ming & Kong, Xiao Wei & Li, Min, 2020. "The magnet effect of circuit breakers and its interactions with price limits," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:61:y:2020:i:c:s0927538x19305128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X19305128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Yong H. & Yagüe, José & Yang, J. Jimmy, 2008. "Relative performance of trading halts and price limits: Evidence from the Spanish Stock Exchange," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 197-215.
    2. Wang, Steven Shuye & Xu, Kuan & Zhang, Hao, 2019. "A microstructure study of circuit breakers in the Chinese stock markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Cho, David D. & Russell, Jeffrey & Tiao, George C. & Tsay, Ruey, 2003. "The magnet effect of price limits: evidence from high-frequency data on Taiwan Stock Exchange," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(1-2), pages 133-168, February.
    4. Yu-Lei Wan & Wen-Jie Xie & Gao-Feng Gu & Zhi-Qiang Jiang & Wei Chen & Xiong Xiong & Wei Zhang & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2015. "Statistical Properties and Pre-Hit Dynamics of Price Limit Hits in the Chinese Stock Markets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    5. He, Qing & Gan, Jingyun & Wang, Shuwan & Chong, Terence Tai-Leung, 2019. "The effects of trading suspensions in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    6. Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei Zhang & Yi-Fang Liu, 2013. "Short-term Market Reaction after Trading Halts in Chinese Stock Market," Papers 1309.1138, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2014.
    7. Jiang, Christine & McInish, Thomas & Upson, James, 2009. "The information content of trading halts," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 703-726, November.
    8. Wong, Woon K. & Liu, Bo & Zeng, Yong, 2009. "Can price limits help when the price is falling? Evidence from transactions data on the Shanghai Stock Exchange," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 91-102, March.
    9. Xu, Hai-Chuan & Zhang, Wei & Liu, Yi-Fang, 2014. "Short-term market reaction after trading halts in Chinese stock market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 103-111.
    10. Gong-meng Chen & Oliver Rui & Steven Wang, 2005. "The Effectiveness of Price Limits and Stock Characteristics: Evidence from the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 159-182, September.
    11. David Abad & Roberto Pascual, 2007. "On the Magnet Effect of Price Limits," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 13(5), pages 833-852, November.
    12. Lily Fang & Joel Peress, 2009. "Media Coverage and the Cross‐section of Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2023-2052, October.
    13. Du, Yan & Liu, Qianqiu & Rhee, S. Ghon, 2006. "An Anatomy of the Magnet Effect: Evidence from the Korea Stock Exchange High-Frequency Data," CEI Working Paper Series 2005-17, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Kenneth A. Kim & Haixiao Liu & J. Jimmy Yang, 2013. "Reconsidering Price Limit Effectiveness," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 36(4), pages 493-518, December.
    15. David Hirshleifer & Sonya Seongyeon Lim & Siew Hong Teoh, 2009. "Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2289-2325, October.
    16. Lee, Charles M C & Ready, Mark J & Seguin, Paul J, 1994. "Volume, Volatility, and New York Stock Exchange Trading Halts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 183-214, March.
    17. Hautsch, Nikolaus & Horvath, Akos, 2019. "How effective are trading pauses?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 378-403.
    18. Kim, Kenneth & Rhee, S Ghon, 1997. "Price Limit Performance: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 885-899, June.
    19. Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 1994. "Circuit Breakers and Market Volatility: A Theoretical Perspective," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 237-254, March.
    20. Lauterbach, Beni & Ben-Zion, Uri, 1993. "Stock Market Crashes and the Performance of Circuit Breakers: Empirical Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1909-1925, December.
    21. Brugler, James & Linton, Oliver & Noss, Joseph & Pedace, Lucas, 2018. "The cross-sectional spillovers of single stock circuit breakers," Bank of England working papers 759, Bank of England.
    22. Goldstein, Michael A. & Kavajecz, Kenneth A., 2004. "Trading strategies during circuit breakers and extreme market movements," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 301-333, June.
    23. Frino, Alex & Lecce, Steven & Segara, Reuben, 2011. "The impact of trading halts on liquidity and price volatility: Evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 298-307, June.
    24. Bei Cui & Arie E. Gozluklu, 2016. "Intraday Rallies and Crashes: Spillovers of Trading Halts," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 472-501, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xinru & Kim, Maria H. & Suardi, Sandy, 2022. "Herding and China's market-wide circuit breaker," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat & Azhar Mohamad, 2019. "Circuit breakers as market stability levers: A survey of research, praxis, and challenges," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 1130-1169, July.
    2. Sifat, Imtiaz Mohammad & Mohamad, Azhar, 2020. "A survey on the magnet effect of circuit breakers in financial markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 138-151.
    3. Wang, Steven Shuye & Xu, Kuan & Zhang, Hao, 2019. "A microstructure study of circuit breakers in the Chinese stock markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Zhang, Xiaotao & Li, Xinxian & Hao, Jing & Li, Peigong, 2023. "Price limit change and magnet effect: The role of investor attention," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. James Brugler & Oliver Linton, 2014. "Single stock circuit breakers on the London Stock Exchange: do they improve subsequent market quality?," CeMMAP working papers CWP07/14, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. James Brugler & Oliver Linton, 2014. "Circuit Breakers on the London Stock Exchange: Do they improve subsequent market quality?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1453, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Jian, Zhihong & Zhu, Zhican & Zhou, Jie & Wu, Shuai, 2020. "Intraday price jumps, market liquidity, and the magnet effect of circuit breakers," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 168-186.
    8. Tang, Siyuan, 2023. "Price limit performance: New evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China's ChiNext market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Cheng Xiang & Jing Lu, 2023. "Magnet effects of circuit breakers in electronic order‐driven markets: Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1450-1469, April.
    10. Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Haferkorn, Martin & Panz, Sven, 2017. "Managing excess volatility: Design and effectiveness of circuit breakers," SAFE Working Paper Series 195, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    11. Sifat, Imtiaz Mohammad & Mohamad, Azhar, 2018. "Trading aggression when price limit hits are imminent: NARDL based intraday investigation of magnet effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 1-8.
    12. Zhihong Jian & Zhican Zhu & Jie Zhou & Shuai Wu, 2018. "The Magnet Effect of Circuit Breakers: A role of price jumps and market liquidity," Departmental Working Papers 2018-01, The University of Winnipeg, Department of Economics.
    13. Carlos Castro & Diego A. Agudelo & Sergio Preciado, 2018. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility auctions," Documentos de Trabajo CIEF 16988, Universidad EAFIT.
    14. Farag, Hisham, 2013. "Price limit bands, asymmetric volatility and stock market anomalies: Evidence from emerging markets," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 85-97.
    15. Diego A. Agudelo & Sergio Preciado & Carlos Castro, 2018. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility auctions," Documentos de Trabajo CIEF 16943, Universidad EAFIT.
    16. Castro, Carlos & Agudelo, Diego A. & Preciado, Sergio, 2020. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility auctions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 566-581.
    17. Wu, Ting & Wang, Yue & Li, Ming-Xia, 2018. "Price performance following stock’s IPO in different price limit systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 953-966.
    18. Hsieh, Ping-Hung & Kim, Yong H. & Yang, J. Jimmy, 2009. "The magnet effect of price limits: A logit approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 830-837, December.
    19. Wong, Woon K. & Chang, Matthew C. & Tu, Anthony H., 2009. "Are magnet effects caused by uninformed traders? Evidence from Taiwan Stock Exchange," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 28-40, January.
    20. Kyong Shik Eom & Kyung Yoon Kwon & Sung Chae La & Jong-Ho Park, 2022. "Dynamic and Static Volatility Interruptions: Evidence from the Korean Stock Markets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Circuit breaker; Price limits; Magnet effect; High frequency stock data;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:61:y:2020:i:c:s0927538x19305128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.