IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v57y2015icp53-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management

Author

Listed:
  • Long, Rachel D.
  • Charles, Anthony
  • Stephenson, Robert L.

Abstract

Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) has gained international popularity in recent years, but the lack of consensus on its definition has precluded the use of a universal implementation framework. The large number and variety of principles that make up EBM, and the diversity in perspectives among key management players, has impeded the practical application of EBM. Agreement on a list of the essential ingredients of EBM is vital to successful application. A frequency analysis of EBM principles was conducted to identify the Key Principles that currently define EBM, from a list of twenty-six principles extracted from a subset of the EBM theoretical/conceptual literature (covering a range of published sources across disciplines and application types). Fifteen Key Principles were identified (in descending frequency of appearance in the literature): Consider Ecosystem Connections, Appropriate Spatial & Temporal Scales, Adaptive Management, Use of Scientific Knowledge, Integrated Management, Stakeholder Involvement, Account for Dynamic Nature of Ecosystems, Ecological Integrity & Biodiversity, Sustainability, Recognise Coupled Social-Ecological Systems, Decisions reflect Societal Choice, Distinct Boundaries, Interdisciplinarity, Appropriate Monitoring, and Acknowledge Uncertainty. This paper also examines the development of EBM principles over time, leading to predictions on the directions EBM will take in the future. The frequency analysis methodology used here can be replicated to update the Key Principles of EBM in the future. Indeed, further research on potential emerging Key Principles such as ‘Consider Cumulative Impacts’, ‘Apply the Precautionary Approach’ and ‘Explicitly Acknowledge Trade Offs’ will help shape EBM and its successful application in the management of marine activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Long, Rachel D. & Charles, Anthony & Stephenson, Robert L., 2015. "Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 53-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:53-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X1500024X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morishita, Joji, 2008. "What is the ecosystem approach for fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 19-26, January.
    2. Pitcher, Tony J. & Kalikoski, Daniela & Short, Katherine & Varkey, Divya & Pramod, Ganapathiraju, 2009. "An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 223-232, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Osborne & Emma Sundström & Örjan Bodin, 2019. "Ecological interdependencies and resource competition: The role of information and communication in promoting effective collaboration in complex management situations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Magali Benichou & Claire Ollier, 2023. "Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management through Cooperation: Resorting to Citizen Participation to Move from Theorization to Concretization? [Implémenter la gestion écosystémique à travers la coopé," Post-Print hal-04331096, HAL.
    3. Wang, Ying & Hu, Jianfeng & Pan, Haoran & Li, Shiyu & Failler, Pierre, 2016. "An integrated model for marine fishery management in the Pearl River Estuary: Linking socio-economic systems and ecosystems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 135-147.
    4. Amanda T. Lombard & Jai Clifford-Holmes & Victoria Goodall & Bernadette Snow & Hannah Truter & Patrick Vrancken & Peter J. S. Jones & Kevern Cochrane & Wesley Flannery & Christina Hicks & Lena Gippert, 2023. "Principles for transformative ocean governance," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1587-1599, December.
    5. Wenzel, Bertolt, 2016. "Organizing coordination in a public marine research and management advice organization: The case of the Norwegian Institute of Marine Research," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 159-167.
    6. Willsteed, Edward A. & Jude, Simon & Gill, Andrew B. & Birchenough, Silvana N.R., 2018. "Obligations and aspirations: A critical evaluation of offshore wind farm cumulative impact assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2332-2345.
    7. Dakota M. Lewis & Katie E. Durham & Linda J. Walters & Geoffrey S. Cook, 2021. "A Resident Fish Guild as a Higher Trophic Level Indicator of Oyster Reef Restoration Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Dell’Apa, Andrea & Fullerton, Adam & Schwing, Franklin & Brady, Margaret M., 2015. "The status of marine and coastal ecosystem-based management among the network of U.S. federal programs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 249-258.
    9. Tin-Yu Lai & Marko Lindroos & Lone Grønbæk & Atso Romakkaniemi, 2021. "The Role of Food Web Interactions in Multispecies Fisheries Management: Bio-economic Analysis of Salmon, Herring and Grey Seal in the Northern Baltic Sea," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(3), pages 511-549, July.
    10. Ralph V Tafon, 2018. "Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 258-273, March.
    11. Laura Recuero Virto, 2017. "A preliminary assessment of indicators for SDG 14 on " Oceans "," Post-Print hal-01639008, HAL.
    12. Malinauskaite, Laura & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Ögmundardóttir, Helga, 2021. "Socio-cultural valuation of whale ecosystem services in Skjálfandi Bay, Iceland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Leandra R. Gonçalves & Leopoldo C. Gerhardinger & Marcus Polette & Alexander Turra, 2021. "An Endless Endeavor: The Evolution and Challenges of Multi-Level Coastal Governance in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Hoof, Luc, 2015. "Fisheries management, the ecosystem approach, regionalisation and the elephants in the room," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 20-26.
    2. Mohammad Mojibul Hoque Mozumder & Aili Pyhälä & Md. Abdul Wahab & Simo Sarkki & Petra Schneider & Mohammad Mahmudul Islam, 2020. "Governance and Power Dynamics in a Small-Scale Hilsa Shad ( Tenualosa ilisha ) Fishery: A Case Study from Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.
    4. Williams, Gary W. & Capps, Jr., Oral, 2022. "The apparent conflict of Norwegian pelagic fisheries management and Norwegian seafood council export promotion," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(3), February.
    5. Patrick, Wesley S. & Link, Jason S., 2015. "Hidden in plain sight: Using optimum yield as a policy framework to operationalize ecosystem-based fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 74-81.
    6. Stefan Borsky & Paul A. Raschky, 2015. "Intergovernmental Interaction in Compliance with an International Environmental Agreement," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 161-203.
    7. Jane L. Harrison & Alexandra Naumenko & John C. Whitehead, 2021. "Attribute Nonattendance And Citizen Preferences For Ecosystem‐Based Fisheries Management: The Case Of Atlantic Menhaden," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 310-324, April.
    8. D. Webster, 2013. "International fisheries: assessing the potential for ecosystem management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 169-183, June.
    9. Jennifer L. Bailey, 2018. "Rethinking the oceans and their management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 189-194, June.
    10. Eddy, Tyler D. & Pitcher, Tony J. & MacDiarmid, Alison B. & Byfield, Tamsen T. & Tam, Jamie C. & Jones, Timothy T. & Bell, James J. & Gardner, Jonathan P.A., 2014. "Lobsters as keystone: Only in unfished ecosystems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 48-72.
    11. Waheed, Rida & Sarwar, Suleman & Alsaggaf, Majid Ibrahim, 2023. "Relevance of energy, green and blue factors to achieve sustainable economic growth: Empirical study of Saudi Arabia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Kahui, Viktoria & Richards, Amanda C., 2014. "Lessons from resource management by indigenous Maori in New Zealand: Governing the ecosystems as a commons," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-7.
    13. Jimenez, Érica Antunes & Gonzalez, Júlio Guazzelli & Amaral, Marilu Teixeira & Lucena Frédou, Flávia, 2021. "Sustainability indicators for the integrated assessment of coastal small-scale fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    14. Muhammad Mohsin & Yin Hengbin & Zhang Luyao & Li Rui & Qian Chong & Ana Mehak, 2022. "An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Helene Gomes & Coralie Kersulec & Luc Doyen & Fabian Blanchard & Abdoul Cisse & Nicolas Sanz, 2020. "Climate warming vs ecological competition for marine tropical biodiversity and fisheries," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2020-13, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    16. Stefan Borsky & Paul A. Raschky, 2011. "A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Compliance with an International Environmental Agreement on Open Access Resources," Working Papers 2011-10, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    17. Yun, Seong Do & Hutniczak, Barbara & Fenichel, Eli P. & Abbott, Joshua K., 2016. "The Wealth of Ecosystems:Valuing Natural Capital in the Context of Ecosystem Based Management," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235737, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Johnson, Galen A. & Niquil, Nathalie & Asmus, Harald & Bacher, Cédric & Asmus, Ragnhild & Baird, Daniel, 2009. "The effects of aggregation on the performance of the inverse method and indicators of network analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3448-3464.
    19. Yuru He & Shuolin Huang & Yi Tang, 2022. "Sustainable Practicalities towards Good Governance in Fish Townships and Villages by Ethics-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Cissé, Abdoul Ahad & Blanchard, Fabian & Guyader, Olivier, 2014. "Sustainability of tropical small-scale fisheries: Integrated assessment in French Guiana," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 397-405.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:53-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.