IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v88y2019ics0264837719305010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Situational analysis of agricultural land leasing in Uttar Pradesh

Author

Listed:
  • Mandal, Somdatta
  • Misra, Gunjika Vishwanath
  • Abbas Naqvi, Syed Mansoor
  • Kumar, Naveen

Abstract

Agricultural land leasing was legally prohibited in India after independence due to its exploitative nature towards the poor tenants. But as a result, large number of landless households started depending on informal land leasing. A qualitative study was carried out during January–March of 2018 in nine agro-climatic zones of Uttar Pradesh, a populous state in northern India, to analyze the current situation of agricultural land leasing. The study found that informal land leasing system is practiced extensively throughout the state. Land is generally rented either under fixed-price rental agreement or under sharecropping agreement. In areas where commercial agriculture is practiced, land is generally leased in by affluent lessees from small landowners under fixed-price rental agreement. On the other hand, in areas where agriculture is practiced for survival, land is leased-in by poor lessees from upper caste, affluent landowners under sharecropping arrangement. Very little awareness was found among both lessors and lessees concerning legislative provisions on agricultural tenancy. As no formal documentation regarding leasing agreement is made, lessees failed to access various benefits provided by the government to the farmers - including agricultural subsidy, agricultural credit and insurance, minimum support price for agricultural product. The study found that women were categorically excluded from the leasing market by their own families, society and government institutions. Women are not generally given land on lease by landowners, they do not get agricultural credit from the banks on their own, and they face security threat from their respective families if they themselves want to lease-out agricultural lands which are in their names. The study acknowledges the need for formalization of leasing agreement, making pro-women and pro-poor leasing policies, and sensitization of public officials in this regard.

Suggested Citation

  • Mandal, Somdatta & Misra, Gunjika Vishwanath & Abbas Naqvi, Syed Mansoor & Kumar, Naveen, 2019. "Situational analysis of agricultural land leasing in Uttar Pradesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837719305010
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719305010
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agriculture Census Division GoI, 2015. "All India Report on Number and Area of Operational Holdings," Working Papers id:6811, eSocialSciences.
    2. Klaus Deininger, 2003. "Land Markets in Developing and Transition Economies: Impact of Liberalization and Implications for Future Reform," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1217-1222.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tingting Fang & Yuefei Zhuo & Cifang Wu & Yihu Zhou & Zhongguo Xu & Guan Li, 2022. "Exploration of Informal Farmland Leasing Mode: A Case Study of Huang Village in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry, 2021. "The Case for Long-Term Land Leasing: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Goyal, Yugank & Choudhury, Pranab Ranjan & Ghosh, Ranjan Kumar, 2022. "Informal land leasing in rural India persists because it is credible," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Alina Źróbek-Różańska & Joanna Zielińska-Szczepkowska, 2019. "National Land Use Policy against the Misuse of the Agricultural Land—Causes and Effects. Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Xin & Xu, Dingde & Zeng, Miao & Qi, Yanbin, 2019. "Does early-life famine experience impact rural land transfer? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 58-67.
    2. Radovan Savov & Juraj Cheben & Drahoslav Lancaric & Roman Serencéš, 2017. "MBNQA Approach in Quality Management Supporting Sustainable Business Performance in Agribusiness," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Cao, Yueming & Bai, Yunli & Zhang, Linxiu, 2021. "Plot Size, Adjacency, and Farmland Rental Contract Choice," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Kai Huang & Xin Deng & Yi Liu & Zhuolin Yong & Dingde Xu, 2020. "Does off-Farm Migration of Female Laborers Inhibit Land Transfer? Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Ma, Xianlei & Heerink, Nico & van Ierland, Ekko & Lang, Hairu & Shi, Xiaoping, 2020. "Decisions by Chinese households regarding renting in arable land—The impact of tenure security perceptions and trust," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Boucher, Stephen R. & Barham, Bradford L. & Carter, Michael R., 2005. "The Impact of "Market-Friendly" Reforms on Credit and Land Markets in Honduras and Nicaragua," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 107-128, January.
    7. Ying Liu & Chenggang Wang & Zeng Tang & Zhibiao Nan, 2017. "Farmland Rental and Productivity of Wheat and Maize: An Empirical Study in Gansu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Feng, Shuyi & Heerink, Nico & Ruben, Ruerd & Qu, Futian, 2010. "Land rental market, off-farm employment and agricultural production in Southeast China: A plot-level case study," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 598-606, December.
    9. Junnan Liu & Tong Chen & Yulan Song, 2022. "Coupling Coordination and Interactivity between Farmland Transfer and Rural Financial Development: Evidence from Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Roses, Joan R., 2015. "Spanish land reform in the 1930s: economic necessity or political opportunism?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64498, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Yueming Cao & Yunli Bai & Linxiu Zhang, 2022. "Plot Size, Adjacency, and Farmland Rental Contract Choice," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Laurence Amblard & J.P. Colin, 2009. "Reverse tenancy in Romania: Actors' rationales and equity outcomes," Post-Print hal-00454533, HAL.
    13. Anderson, John E., 2019. "Access to land and permits: Firm-level evidence of impediments to development in transition countries," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 38-57.
    14. Chaoran Chen & Diego Restuccia & Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis, 2022. "The Effects of Land Markets on Resource Allocation and Agricultural Productivity," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 41-54, July.
    15. Deininger, Klaus & Savastano, Sara & Xia, Fang, 2017. "Smallholders’ land access in Sub-Saharan Africa: A new landscape?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 78-92.
    16. Ghebru, Hosaena & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2016. "Household perception and demand for better protection of land rights in Ethiopia:," ESSP working papers 83, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Mertens, Kewan & Vranken, Liesbet, 2018. "Investing in land to change your risk exposure? Land transactions and inequality in a landslide prone region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 437-452.
    18. Jianyun Hou & Xuexi Huo & Runsheng Yin, 2017. "Land Rental Market Participation and Its Impact on Fixed Investment and Household Welfare: Evidence from Chinese Apple Production Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Efficiency and distribution of rural construction land marketization in contemporary China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Li, Rui & Li, Qinghai & Lv, Xiaofeng & Zhu, Xi, 2019. "The land rental of Chinese rural households and its welfare effects," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 204-217.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837719305010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.